Cargando…
Estimation of pollutant sources in multi-zone buildings through different deconvolution algorithms
Effective identification of pollution sources is particularly important for indoor air quality. Accurate estimation of source strength is the basis for source effective identification. This paper proposes an optimization method for the deconvolution process in the source strength inverse calculation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tsinghua University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8443894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0826-3 |
_version_ | 1784568388241063936 |
---|---|
author | Li, Mo Li, Fei Jing, Yuanqi Zhang, Kai Cai, Hao Chen, Lufang Zhang, Xian Feng, Lihang |
author_facet | Li, Mo Li, Fei Jing, Yuanqi Zhang, Kai Cai, Hao Chen, Lufang Zhang, Xian Feng, Lihang |
author_sort | Li, Mo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Effective identification of pollution sources is particularly important for indoor air quality. Accurate estimation of source strength is the basis for source effective identification. This paper proposes an optimization method for the deconvolution process in the source strength inverse calculation. In the scheme, the concept of time resolution was defined, and combined with different filtering positions and filtering algorithms. The measures to reduce effects of measurement noise were quantitatively analyzed. Additionally, the performances of nine deconvolution inverse algorithms under experimental and simulated conditions were evaluated and scored. The hybrid algorithms were proposed and compared with single algorithms including Tikhonov regularization and iterative methods. Results showed that for the filtering position and algorithm, Butterworth filtering performed better, and different filtering positions had little effect on the inverse calculation. For the calculation time step, the optimal Tr (time resolution) was 0.667% and 1.33% in the simulation and experiment, respectively. The hybrid algorithms were found to not perform better than the single algorithms, and the SART (simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique) algorithm from CAT (computer assisted tomography) yielded better performances in the accuracy and stability of source strength identification. The relative errors of the inverse calculation for source strength were typically below 25% using the optimization scheme. [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8443894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Tsinghua University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84438942021-09-16 Estimation of pollutant sources in multi-zone buildings through different deconvolution algorithms Li, Mo Li, Fei Jing, Yuanqi Zhang, Kai Cai, Hao Chen, Lufang Zhang, Xian Feng, Lihang Build Simul Research Article Effective identification of pollution sources is particularly important for indoor air quality. Accurate estimation of source strength is the basis for source effective identification. This paper proposes an optimization method for the deconvolution process in the source strength inverse calculation. In the scheme, the concept of time resolution was defined, and combined with different filtering positions and filtering algorithms. The measures to reduce effects of measurement noise were quantitatively analyzed. Additionally, the performances of nine deconvolution inverse algorithms under experimental and simulated conditions were evaluated and scored. The hybrid algorithms were proposed and compared with single algorithms including Tikhonov regularization and iterative methods. Results showed that for the filtering position and algorithm, Butterworth filtering performed better, and different filtering positions had little effect on the inverse calculation. For the calculation time step, the optimal Tr (time resolution) was 0.667% and 1.33% in the simulation and experiment, respectively. The hybrid algorithms were found to not perform better than the single algorithms, and the SART (simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique) algorithm from CAT (computer assisted tomography) yielded better performances in the accuracy and stability of source strength identification. The relative errors of the inverse calculation for source strength were typically below 25% using the optimization scheme. [Image: see text] Tsinghua University Press 2021-09-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8443894/ /pubmed/34545299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0826-3 Text en © Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Mo Li, Fei Jing, Yuanqi Zhang, Kai Cai, Hao Chen, Lufang Zhang, Xian Feng, Lihang Estimation of pollutant sources in multi-zone buildings through different deconvolution algorithms |
title | Estimation of pollutant sources in multi-zone buildings through different deconvolution algorithms |
title_full | Estimation of pollutant sources in multi-zone buildings through different deconvolution algorithms |
title_fullStr | Estimation of pollutant sources in multi-zone buildings through different deconvolution algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of pollutant sources in multi-zone buildings through different deconvolution algorithms |
title_short | Estimation of pollutant sources in multi-zone buildings through different deconvolution algorithms |
title_sort | estimation of pollutant sources in multi-zone buildings through different deconvolution algorithms |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8443894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0826-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limo estimationofpollutantsourcesinmultizonebuildingsthroughdifferentdeconvolutionalgorithms AT lifei estimationofpollutantsourcesinmultizonebuildingsthroughdifferentdeconvolutionalgorithms AT jingyuanqi estimationofpollutantsourcesinmultizonebuildingsthroughdifferentdeconvolutionalgorithms AT zhangkai estimationofpollutantsourcesinmultizonebuildingsthroughdifferentdeconvolutionalgorithms AT caihao estimationofpollutantsourcesinmultizonebuildingsthroughdifferentdeconvolutionalgorithms AT chenlufang estimationofpollutantsourcesinmultizonebuildingsthroughdifferentdeconvolutionalgorithms AT zhangxian estimationofpollutantsourcesinmultizonebuildingsthroughdifferentdeconvolutionalgorithms AT fenglihang estimationofpollutantsourcesinmultizonebuildingsthroughdifferentdeconvolutionalgorithms |