Cargando…
Defining and measuring microservice granularity—a literature overview
BACKGROUND: Microservices are an architectural approach of growing use, and the optimal granularity of a microservice directly affects the application’s quality attributes and usage of computational resources. Determining microservice granularity is an open research topic. METHODOLOGY: We conducted...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34604522 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.695 |
_version_ | 1784568419720364032 |
---|---|
author | Vera-Rivera, Fredy H. Gaona, Carlos Astudillo, Hernán |
author_facet | Vera-Rivera, Fredy H. Gaona, Carlos Astudillo, Hernán |
author_sort | Vera-Rivera, Fredy H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Microservices are an architectural approach of growing use, and the optimal granularity of a microservice directly affects the application’s quality attributes and usage of computational resources. Determining microservice granularity is an open research topic. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a systematic literature review to analyze literature that addresses the definition of microservice granularity. We searched in IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library and Scopus. The research questions were: Which approaches have been proposed to define microservice granularity and determine the microservices’ size? Which metrics are used to evaluate microservice granularity? Which quality attributes are addressed when researching microservice granularity? RESULTS: We found 326 papers and selected 29 after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality attributes most often addressed are runtime properties (e.g., scalability and performance), not development properties (e.g., maintainability). Most proposed metrics were about the product, both static (coupling, cohesion, complexity, source code) and runtime (performance, and usage of computational resources), and a few were about the development team and process. The most used techniques for defining microservices granularity were machine learning (clustering), semantic similarity, genetic programming, and domain engineering. Most papers were concerned with migration from monoliths to microservices; and a few addressed green-field development, but none address improvement of granularity in existing microservice-based systems. CONCLUSIONS: Methodologically speaking, microservice granularity research is at a Wild West stage: no standard definition, no clear development—operation trade-offs, and scarce conceptual reuse (e.g., few methods seem applicable or replicable in projects other than their initial proposal). These gaps in granularity research offer clear options to investigate on continuous improvement of the development and operation of microservice-based systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8444086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84440862021-09-30 Defining and measuring microservice granularity—a literature overview Vera-Rivera, Fredy H. Gaona, Carlos Astudillo, Hernán PeerJ Comput Sci Distributed and Parallel Computing BACKGROUND: Microservices are an architectural approach of growing use, and the optimal granularity of a microservice directly affects the application’s quality attributes and usage of computational resources. Determining microservice granularity is an open research topic. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a systematic literature review to analyze literature that addresses the definition of microservice granularity. We searched in IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library and Scopus. The research questions were: Which approaches have been proposed to define microservice granularity and determine the microservices’ size? Which metrics are used to evaluate microservice granularity? Which quality attributes are addressed when researching microservice granularity? RESULTS: We found 326 papers and selected 29 after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality attributes most often addressed are runtime properties (e.g., scalability and performance), not development properties (e.g., maintainability). Most proposed metrics were about the product, both static (coupling, cohesion, complexity, source code) and runtime (performance, and usage of computational resources), and a few were about the development team and process. The most used techniques for defining microservices granularity were machine learning (clustering), semantic similarity, genetic programming, and domain engineering. Most papers were concerned with migration from monoliths to microservices; and a few addressed green-field development, but none address improvement of granularity in existing microservice-based systems. CONCLUSIONS: Methodologically speaking, microservice granularity research is at a Wild West stage: no standard definition, no clear development—operation trade-offs, and scarce conceptual reuse (e.g., few methods seem applicable or replicable in projects other than their initial proposal). These gaps in granularity research offer clear options to investigate on continuous improvement of the development and operation of microservice-based systems. PeerJ Inc. 2021-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8444086/ /pubmed/34604522 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.695 Text en © 2021 Vera-Rivera et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Computer Science) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Distributed and Parallel Computing Vera-Rivera, Fredy H. Gaona, Carlos Astudillo, Hernán Defining and measuring microservice granularity—a literature overview |
title | Defining and measuring microservice granularity—a literature overview |
title_full | Defining and measuring microservice granularity—a literature overview |
title_fullStr | Defining and measuring microservice granularity—a literature overview |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining and measuring microservice granularity—a literature overview |
title_short | Defining and measuring microservice granularity—a literature overview |
title_sort | defining and measuring microservice granularity—a literature overview |
topic | Distributed and Parallel Computing |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34604522 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.695 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verariverafredyh definingandmeasuringmicroservicegranularityaliteratureoverview AT gaonacarlos definingandmeasuringmicroservicegranularityaliteratureoverview AT astudillohernan definingandmeasuringmicroservicegranularityaliteratureoverview |