Cargando…

Comparing root exudate collection techniques: An improved hybrid method

1. Plant-microbe interactions are critical for ecosystem functioning and drive rhizosphere processes. Root exudates are an important soil carbon (C) input, as well as a mechanism for communication between plants and rhizosphere microbes, but are notoriously difficult to extract and characterise. Com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Alex, Langridge, Holly, Straathof, Angela L., Fox, Graeme, Muhammadali, Howbeer, Hollywood, Katherine A., Xu, Yun, Goodacre, Royston, de Vries, Franciska T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34602656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108391
_version_ 1784568420235214848
author Williams, Alex
Langridge, Holly
Straathof, Angela L.
Fox, Graeme
Muhammadali, Howbeer
Hollywood, Katherine A.
Xu, Yun
Goodacre, Royston
de Vries, Franciska T.
author_facet Williams, Alex
Langridge, Holly
Straathof, Angela L.
Fox, Graeme
Muhammadali, Howbeer
Hollywood, Katherine A.
Xu, Yun
Goodacre, Royston
de Vries, Franciska T.
author_sort Williams, Alex
collection PubMed
description 1. Plant-microbe interactions are critical for ecosystem functioning and drive rhizosphere processes. Root exudates are an important soil carbon (C) input, as well as a mechanism for communication between plants and rhizosphere microbes, but are notoriously difficult to extract and characterise. Common methods produce either substantial noise from the soil or do not mimic natural systems. Optimising methods for root exudate collection in soil is crucial for advancing our understanding of root-microbe interactions under changing environmental conditions. 2. Hybrid root exudate collection methods, where plants are grown in soil and transferred to hydroponics for exudate collection after root washing, might offer an ecologically relevant alternative to existing approaches. However, this method causes potential root damage as well as osmosis and subsequent leaking of cell contents. Here, we assessed different ‘root recovery’ periods after root washing and before hybrid root exudate collection, by comparing root exudate quantity and quality with both damaged root extracts and with leachates collected from the intact root-soil system. This was done across three common grassland species representing three functional groups. 3. We found that root exudate profiles of the shortest recovery period (0 days) were similar to damaged root extracts and were very high in C. With an increasing period of root recovery, profiles were more similar to leachates collected from the intact root-soil system, and C concentrations decreased. While both hybrid and leachate collection methods separated species by their root exudate profiles, the hybrid method was less variable in terms of the amount of C measured and provided a more diverse and abundant metabolome with better identification of metabolites. 4. Our results show that a recovery period after root washing of at least 3 days is critical to prevent root damage bias in hybrid collection methods, and that our hybrid method yields exudates that discriminate between species. Our data also suggest that exudates collected with this hybrid method are ecologically valid, which is vital for gaining a mechanistic understanding of their role in ecosystem functioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8444088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84440882021-10-01 Comparing root exudate collection techniques: An improved hybrid method Williams, Alex Langridge, Holly Straathof, Angela L. Fox, Graeme Muhammadali, Howbeer Hollywood, Katherine A. Xu, Yun Goodacre, Royston de Vries, Franciska T. Soil Biol Biochem Article 1. Plant-microbe interactions are critical for ecosystem functioning and drive rhizosphere processes. Root exudates are an important soil carbon (C) input, as well as a mechanism for communication between plants and rhizosphere microbes, but are notoriously difficult to extract and characterise. Common methods produce either substantial noise from the soil or do not mimic natural systems. Optimising methods for root exudate collection in soil is crucial for advancing our understanding of root-microbe interactions under changing environmental conditions. 2. Hybrid root exudate collection methods, where plants are grown in soil and transferred to hydroponics for exudate collection after root washing, might offer an ecologically relevant alternative to existing approaches. However, this method causes potential root damage as well as osmosis and subsequent leaking of cell contents. Here, we assessed different ‘root recovery’ periods after root washing and before hybrid root exudate collection, by comparing root exudate quantity and quality with both damaged root extracts and with leachates collected from the intact root-soil system. This was done across three common grassland species representing three functional groups. 3. We found that root exudate profiles of the shortest recovery period (0 days) were similar to damaged root extracts and were very high in C. With an increasing period of root recovery, profiles were more similar to leachates collected from the intact root-soil system, and C concentrations decreased. While both hybrid and leachate collection methods separated species by their root exudate profiles, the hybrid method was less variable in terms of the amount of C measured and provided a more diverse and abundant metabolome with better identification of metabolites. 4. Our results show that a recovery period after root washing of at least 3 days is critical to prevent root damage bias in hybrid collection methods, and that our hybrid method yields exudates that discriminate between species. Our data also suggest that exudates collected with this hybrid method are ecologically valid, which is vital for gaining a mechanistic understanding of their role in ecosystem functioning. Elsevier 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8444088/ /pubmed/34602656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108391 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Williams, Alex
Langridge, Holly
Straathof, Angela L.
Fox, Graeme
Muhammadali, Howbeer
Hollywood, Katherine A.
Xu, Yun
Goodacre, Royston
de Vries, Franciska T.
Comparing root exudate collection techniques: An improved hybrid method
title Comparing root exudate collection techniques: An improved hybrid method
title_full Comparing root exudate collection techniques: An improved hybrid method
title_fullStr Comparing root exudate collection techniques: An improved hybrid method
title_full_unstemmed Comparing root exudate collection techniques: An improved hybrid method
title_short Comparing root exudate collection techniques: An improved hybrid method
title_sort comparing root exudate collection techniques: an improved hybrid method
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34602656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108391
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsalex comparingrootexudatecollectiontechniquesanimprovedhybridmethod
AT langridgeholly comparingrootexudatecollectiontechniquesanimprovedhybridmethod
AT straathofangelal comparingrootexudatecollectiontechniquesanimprovedhybridmethod
AT foxgraeme comparingrootexudatecollectiontechniquesanimprovedhybridmethod
AT muhammadalihowbeer comparingrootexudatecollectiontechniquesanimprovedhybridmethod
AT hollywoodkatherinea comparingrootexudatecollectiontechniquesanimprovedhybridmethod
AT xuyun comparingrootexudatecollectiontechniquesanimprovedhybridmethod
AT goodacreroyston comparingrootexudatecollectiontechniquesanimprovedhybridmethod
AT devriesfranciskat comparingrootexudatecollectiontechniquesanimprovedhybridmethod