Cargando…
Whether Slow-Pull-Back or Standard Suction, Optimal Histologic Core Procurement Is Most Important Factor Rather than Blood Contamination or Cellularity in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition of Pancreatic Solid Tumor
Autor principal: | Park, Se Woo |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521777 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl210402 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A Meta-Analysis of Slow Pull versus Suction for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition
por: Nakai, Yousuke, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors
por: Lee, Joon Seop, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Comparison of specimen quality among the standard suction, slow-pull, and wet suction techniques for EUS-FNA: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial
por: Chen, Tian-Yin, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Demand-pull and environmental innovations: Estimating the effects of innovative public procurement
por: Ghisetti, Claudia
Publicado: (2017) -
Prospective comparison of slow-pull and standard suction techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic cancer
por: Bor, Renáta, et al.
Publicado: (2019)