Cargando…

Improving time to palliative care review with predictive modeling in an inpatient adult population: study protocol for a stepped-wedge, pragmatic randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Palliative care is a medical specialty centered on improving the quality of life (QOL) of patients with complex or life-threatening illnesses. The need for palliative care is increasing and with that the rigorous testing of triage tools that can be used quickly and reliably to identify p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Patrick M., Philpot, Lindsey M., Ramar, Priya, Storlie, Curtis B., Strand, Jacob, Morgan, Alisha A., Asai, Shusaku W., Ebbert, Jon O., Herasevich, Vitaly D., Soleimani, Jalal, Pickering, Brian W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05546-5
_version_ 1784568431370043392
author Wilson, Patrick M.
Philpot, Lindsey M.
Ramar, Priya
Storlie, Curtis B.
Strand, Jacob
Morgan, Alisha A.
Asai, Shusaku W.
Ebbert, Jon O.
Herasevich, Vitaly D.
Soleimani, Jalal
Pickering, Brian W.
author_facet Wilson, Patrick M.
Philpot, Lindsey M.
Ramar, Priya
Storlie, Curtis B.
Strand, Jacob
Morgan, Alisha A.
Asai, Shusaku W.
Ebbert, Jon O.
Herasevich, Vitaly D.
Soleimani, Jalal
Pickering, Brian W.
author_sort Wilson, Patrick M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Palliative care is a medical specialty centered on improving the quality of life (QOL) of patients with complex or life-threatening illnesses. The need for palliative care is increasing and with that the rigorous testing of triage tools that can be used quickly and reliably to identify patients that may benefit from palliative care. METHODS: To that aim, we will conduct a two-armed stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial rolled out to two inpatient hospitals to evaluate whether a machine learning algorithm accurately identifies patients who may benefit from a comprehensive review by a palliative care specialist and decreases time to receiving a palliative care consult in hospital. This is a single-center study which will be conducted from August 2019 to November 2020 at Saint Mary’s Hospital & Methodist Hospital both within Mayo Clinic Rochester in Minnesota. Clusters will be nursing units which will be chosen to be a mix of complex patients from Cardiology, Critical Care, and Oncology and had previously established relationships with palliative medicine. The stepped wedge design will have 12 units allocated to a design matrix of 5 treatment wedges. Each wedge will last 75 days resulting in a study period of 12 months of recruitment unless otherwise specified. Data will be analyzed with Bayesian hierarchical models with credible intervals denoting statistical significance. DISCUSSION: This intervention offers a pragmatic approach to delivering specialty palliative care to hospital patients in need using machine learning, thereby leading to high value care and improved outcomes. It is not enough for AI to be utilized by simply publishing research showing predictive performance; clinical trials demonstrating better outcomes are critically needed. Furthermore, the deployment of an AI algorithm is a complex process that requires multiple teams with varying skill sets. To evaluate a deployed AI, a pragmatic clinical trial can accommodate the difficulties of clinical practice while retaining scientific rigor. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03976297. Registered on 6 June 2019, prior to trial start. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05546-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8444160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84441602021-09-16 Improving time to palliative care review with predictive modeling in an inpatient adult population: study protocol for a stepped-wedge, pragmatic randomized controlled trial Wilson, Patrick M. Philpot, Lindsey M. Ramar, Priya Storlie, Curtis B. Strand, Jacob Morgan, Alisha A. Asai, Shusaku W. Ebbert, Jon O. Herasevich, Vitaly D. Soleimani, Jalal Pickering, Brian W. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Palliative care is a medical specialty centered on improving the quality of life (QOL) of patients with complex or life-threatening illnesses. The need for palliative care is increasing and with that the rigorous testing of triage tools that can be used quickly and reliably to identify patients that may benefit from palliative care. METHODS: To that aim, we will conduct a two-armed stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial rolled out to two inpatient hospitals to evaluate whether a machine learning algorithm accurately identifies patients who may benefit from a comprehensive review by a palliative care specialist and decreases time to receiving a palliative care consult in hospital. This is a single-center study which will be conducted from August 2019 to November 2020 at Saint Mary’s Hospital & Methodist Hospital both within Mayo Clinic Rochester in Minnesota. Clusters will be nursing units which will be chosen to be a mix of complex patients from Cardiology, Critical Care, and Oncology and had previously established relationships with palliative medicine. The stepped wedge design will have 12 units allocated to a design matrix of 5 treatment wedges. Each wedge will last 75 days resulting in a study period of 12 months of recruitment unless otherwise specified. Data will be analyzed with Bayesian hierarchical models with credible intervals denoting statistical significance. DISCUSSION: This intervention offers a pragmatic approach to delivering specialty palliative care to hospital patients in need using machine learning, thereby leading to high value care and improved outcomes. It is not enough for AI to be utilized by simply publishing research showing predictive performance; clinical trials demonstrating better outcomes are critically needed. Furthermore, the deployment of an AI algorithm is a complex process that requires multiple teams with varying skill sets. To evaluate a deployed AI, a pragmatic clinical trial can accommodate the difficulties of clinical practice while retaining scientific rigor. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03976297. Registered on 6 June 2019, prior to trial start. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05546-5. BioMed Central 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8444160/ /pubmed/34530871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05546-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Wilson, Patrick M.
Philpot, Lindsey M.
Ramar, Priya
Storlie, Curtis B.
Strand, Jacob
Morgan, Alisha A.
Asai, Shusaku W.
Ebbert, Jon O.
Herasevich, Vitaly D.
Soleimani, Jalal
Pickering, Brian W.
Improving time to palliative care review with predictive modeling in an inpatient adult population: study protocol for a stepped-wedge, pragmatic randomized controlled trial
title Improving time to palliative care review with predictive modeling in an inpatient adult population: study protocol for a stepped-wedge, pragmatic randomized controlled trial
title_full Improving time to palliative care review with predictive modeling in an inpatient adult population: study protocol for a stepped-wedge, pragmatic randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Improving time to palliative care review with predictive modeling in an inpatient adult population: study protocol for a stepped-wedge, pragmatic randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Improving time to palliative care review with predictive modeling in an inpatient adult population: study protocol for a stepped-wedge, pragmatic randomized controlled trial
title_short Improving time to palliative care review with predictive modeling in an inpatient adult population: study protocol for a stepped-wedge, pragmatic randomized controlled trial
title_sort improving time to palliative care review with predictive modeling in an inpatient adult population: study protocol for a stepped-wedge, pragmatic randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05546-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonpatrickm improvingtimetopalliativecarereviewwithpredictivemodelinginaninpatientadultpopulationstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgepragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT philpotlindseym improvingtimetopalliativecarereviewwithpredictivemodelinginaninpatientadultpopulationstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgepragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ramarpriya improvingtimetopalliativecarereviewwithpredictivemodelinginaninpatientadultpopulationstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgepragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT storliecurtisb improvingtimetopalliativecarereviewwithpredictivemodelinginaninpatientadultpopulationstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgepragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT strandjacob improvingtimetopalliativecarereviewwithpredictivemodelinginaninpatientadultpopulationstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgepragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT morganalishaa improvingtimetopalliativecarereviewwithpredictivemodelinginaninpatientadultpopulationstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgepragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT asaishusakuw improvingtimetopalliativecarereviewwithpredictivemodelinginaninpatientadultpopulationstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgepragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ebbertjono improvingtimetopalliativecarereviewwithpredictivemodelinginaninpatientadultpopulationstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgepragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT herasevichvitalyd improvingtimetopalliativecarereviewwithpredictivemodelinginaninpatientadultpopulationstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgepragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT soleimanijalal improvingtimetopalliativecarereviewwithpredictivemodelinginaninpatientadultpopulationstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgepragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pickeringbrianw improvingtimetopalliativecarereviewwithpredictivemodelinginaninpatientadultpopulationstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgepragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial