Cargando…

Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: A third of pregnant women in the UK are vitamin D deficient, which may confer deleterious consequences, including an increased risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus and intrauterine growth restriction. This study aims to determine the proportion of women that met National...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamanouchi, Liana, Srinivasan, Maheshwari, Barlow, Nicola, Basu, Ansu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048705
_version_ 1784568452941348864
author Yamanouchi, Liana
Srinivasan, Maheshwari
Barlow, Nicola
Basu, Ansu
author_facet Yamanouchi, Liana
Srinivasan, Maheshwari
Barlow, Nicola
Basu, Ansu
author_sort Yamanouchi, Liana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: A third of pregnant women in the UK are vitamin D deficient, which may confer deleterious consequences, including an increased risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus and intrauterine growth restriction. This study aims to determine the proportion of women that met National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) standards for vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and compare biochemical and obstetrical outcomes according to supplementation status. DESIGN AND SETTING: This is a single-centre cross-sectional study in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK. Participants received a questionnaire regarding their experiences with vitamin D supplementation during their pregnancy with their general practitioner. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and bone profile results were obtained during the same appointment and obstetrical outcomes were collected retrospectively once participants had delivered. RESULTS: 41.8% of participants (n=61) received written and/or verbal advice about supplementation, (NICE standards=100%). 72.6% (n=106) had one or more risk factors for vitamin D deficiency, of which 38.7% (n=41, NICE standards=100%) were asked about supplementation. Among those asked, 85.4% (n=41, NICE standards=100%) received the correct dosage. Compared with the supplementation group, the non-supplementation group had offspring that were 1.40 cm (95% CI 0.01 to 2.80, p=0.04) longer at birth; which was significant after adjusting for confounding factors. No significant differences in any biochemical parameters were observed between supplementation categories (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to NICE standards was suboptimal. This may be attributed to insufficient training for general practitioners on the importance of supplementation, causing them to underestimate the consequences of gestational vitamin D deficiency. Recommendations include implementing a mandatory screening tool to identify ‘at-risk’ women and providing more clinician training to ensure that supplementation during pregnancy is standard of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8444259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84442592021-10-01 Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study Yamanouchi, Liana Srinivasan, Maheshwari Barlow, Nicola Basu, Ansu BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: A third of pregnant women in the UK are vitamin D deficient, which may confer deleterious consequences, including an increased risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus and intrauterine growth restriction. This study aims to determine the proportion of women that met National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) standards for vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and compare biochemical and obstetrical outcomes according to supplementation status. DESIGN AND SETTING: This is a single-centre cross-sectional study in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK. Participants received a questionnaire regarding their experiences with vitamin D supplementation during their pregnancy with their general practitioner. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and bone profile results were obtained during the same appointment and obstetrical outcomes were collected retrospectively once participants had delivered. RESULTS: 41.8% of participants (n=61) received written and/or verbal advice about supplementation, (NICE standards=100%). 72.6% (n=106) had one or more risk factors for vitamin D deficiency, of which 38.7% (n=41, NICE standards=100%) were asked about supplementation. Among those asked, 85.4% (n=41, NICE standards=100%) received the correct dosage. Compared with the supplementation group, the non-supplementation group had offspring that were 1.40 cm (95% CI 0.01 to 2.80, p=0.04) longer at birth; which was significant after adjusting for confounding factors. No significant differences in any biochemical parameters were observed between supplementation categories (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to NICE standards was suboptimal. This may be attributed to insufficient training for general practitioners on the importance of supplementation, causing them to underestimate the consequences of gestational vitamin D deficiency. Recommendations include implementing a mandatory screening tool to identify ‘at-risk’ women and providing more clinician training to ensure that supplementation during pregnancy is standard of care. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8444259/ /pubmed/34526340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048705 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Yamanouchi, Liana
Srinivasan, Maheshwari
Barlow, Nicola
Basu, Ansu
Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study
title Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study
title_full Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study
title_short Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study
title_sort level of adherence to vitamin d supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in birmingham, uk, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048705
work_keys_str_mv AT yamanouchiliana levelofadherencetovitamindsupplementationguidelinesinanantenatalcentreinbirminghamukanditseffectonbiochemicalandobstetricaloutcomesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT srinivasanmaheshwari levelofadherencetovitamindsupplementationguidelinesinanantenatalcentreinbirminghamukanditseffectonbiochemicalandobstetricaloutcomesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT barlownicola levelofadherencetovitamindsupplementationguidelinesinanantenatalcentreinbirminghamukanditseffectonbiochemicalandobstetricaloutcomesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT basuansu levelofadherencetovitamindsupplementationguidelinesinanantenatalcentreinbirminghamukanditseffectonbiochemicalandobstetricaloutcomesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy