Cargando…
Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVES: A third of pregnant women in the UK are vitamin D deficient, which may confer deleterious consequences, including an increased risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus and intrauterine growth restriction. This study aims to determine the proportion of women that met National...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048705 |
_version_ | 1784568452941348864 |
---|---|
author | Yamanouchi, Liana Srinivasan, Maheshwari Barlow, Nicola Basu, Ansu |
author_facet | Yamanouchi, Liana Srinivasan, Maheshwari Barlow, Nicola Basu, Ansu |
author_sort | Yamanouchi, Liana |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: A third of pregnant women in the UK are vitamin D deficient, which may confer deleterious consequences, including an increased risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus and intrauterine growth restriction. This study aims to determine the proportion of women that met National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) standards for vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and compare biochemical and obstetrical outcomes according to supplementation status. DESIGN AND SETTING: This is a single-centre cross-sectional study in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK. Participants received a questionnaire regarding their experiences with vitamin D supplementation during their pregnancy with their general practitioner. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and bone profile results were obtained during the same appointment and obstetrical outcomes were collected retrospectively once participants had delivered. RESULTS: 41.8% of participants (n=61) received written and/or verbal advice about supplementation, (NICE standards=100%). 72.6% (n=106) had one or more risk factors for vitamin D deficiency, of which 38.7% (n=41, NICE standards=100%) were asked about supplementation. Among those asked, 85.4% (n=41, NICE standards=100%) received the correct dosage. Compared with the supplementation group, the non-supplementation group had offspring that were 1.40 cm (95% CI 0.01 to 2.80, p=0.04) longer at birth; which was significant after adjusting for confounding factors. No significant differences in any biochemical parameters were observed between supplementation categories (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to NICE standards was suboptimal. This may be attributed to insufficient training for general practitioners on the importance of supplementation, causing them to underestimate the consequences of gestational vitamin D deficiency. Recommendations include implementing a mandatory screening tool to identify ‘at-risk’ women and providing more clinician training to ensure that supplementation during pregnancy is standard of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8444259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84442592021-10-01 Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study Yamanouchi, Liana Srinivasan, Maheshwari Barlow, Nicola Basu, Ansu BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: A third of pregnant women in the UK are vitamin D deficient, which may confer deleterious consequences, including an increased risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus and intrauterine growth restriction. This study aims to determine the proportion of women that met National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) standards for vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and compare biochemical and obstetrical outcomes according to supplementation status. DESIGN AND SETTING: This is a single-centre cross-sectional study in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK. Participants received a questionnaire regarding their experiences with vitamin D supplementation during their pregnancy with their general practitioner. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and bone profile results were obtained during the same appointment and obstetrical outcomes were collected retrospectively once participants had delivered. RESULTS: 41.8% of participants (n=61) received written and/or verbal advice about supplementation, (NICE standards=100%). 72.6% (n=106) had one or more risk factors for vitamin D deficiency, of which 38.7% (n=41, NICE standards=100%) were asked about supplementation. Among those asked, 85.4% (n=41, NICE standards=100%) received the correct dosage. Compared with the supplementation group, the non-supplementation group had offspring that were 1.40 cm (95% CI 0.01 to 2.80, p=0.04) longer at birth; which was significant after adjusting for confounding factors. No significant differences in any biochemical parameters were observed between supplementation categories (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to NICE standards was suboptimal. This may be attributed to insufficient training for general practitioners on the importance of supplementation, causing them to underestimate the consequences of gestational vitamin D deficiency. Recommendations include implementing a mandatory screening tool to identify ‘at-risk’ women and providing more clinician training to ensure that supplementation during pregnancy is standard of care. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8444259/ /pubmed/34526340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048705 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Yamanouchi, Liana Srinivasan, Maheshwari Barlow, Nicola Basu, Ansu Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study |
title | Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study |
title_full | Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study |
title_short | Level of adherence to vitamin D supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in Birmingham, UK, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study |
title_sort | level of adherence to vitamin d supplementation guidelines in an antenatal centre in birmingham, uk, and its effect on biochemical and obstetrical outcomes: a single-centre cross-sectional study |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048705 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamanouchiliana levelofadherencetovitamindsupplementationguidelinesinanantenatalcentreinbirminghamukanditseffectonbiochemicalandobstetricaloutcomesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy AT srinivasanmaheshwari levelofadherencetovitamindsupplementationguidelinesinanantenatalcentreinbirminghamukanditseffectonbiochemicalandobstetricaloutcomesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy AT barlownicola levelofadherencetovitamindsupplementationguidelinesinanantenatalcentreinbirminghamukanditseffectonbiochemicalandobstetricaloutcomesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy AT basuansu levelofadherencetovitamindsupplementationguidelinesinanantenatalcentreinbirminghamukanditseffectonbiochemicalandobstetricaloutcomesasinglecentrecrosssectionalstudy |