Cargando…

Chemical signature of colorectal cancer: case–control study for profiling the breath print

BACKGROUND: Effective screening for colorectal cancer can reduce mortality by early detection of tumours and colonic polyps. An altered pattern of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath has been proposed as a potential non‐invasive diagnostic tool for detection of cancer. The aim of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Altomare, D. F., Picciariello, A., Rotelli, M. T., De Fazio, M., Aresta, A., Zambonin, C. G., Vincenti, L., Trerotoli, P., De Vietro, N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32990407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50354
_version_ 1784568457112584192
author Altomare, D. F.
Picciariello, A.
Rotelli, M. T.
De Fazio, M.
Aresta, A.
Zambonin, C. G.
Vincenti, L.
Trerotoli, P.
De Vietro, N.
author_facet Altomare, D. F.
Picciariello, A.
Rotelli, M. T.
De Fazio, M.
Aresta, A.
Zambonin, C. G.
Vincenti, L.
Trerotoli, P.
De Vietro, N.
author_sort Altomare, D. F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective screening for colorectal cancer can reduce mortality by early detection of tumours and colonic polyps. An altered pattern of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath has been proposed as a potential non‐invasive diagnostic tool for detection of cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of breath‐testing for colorectal cancer screening and early diagnosis using an advanced breath sampler. METHODS: The exhaled breath of patients with colorectal cancer and non‐cancer controls with negative findings on colonoscopy was collected using the ReCIVA® Breath Sampler. This portable device is able to capture the alveolar breath fraction without environmental contamination. VOCs were desorbed thermally and analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The discriminatory ability of VOCs in detecting colorectal cancer was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for each VOC, followed by cross‐validation by the leave‐one‐out method, and by applying stepwise logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study included 83 patients with colorectal cancer and 90 non‐cancer controls. Fourteen VOCs were found to have significant discriminatory ability in detecting patients with colorectal cancer. The model with the diagnosis of cancer versus no cancer resulted in a statistically significant likelihood of discrimination of 173·45 (P < 0·001), with an area under the ROC curve of 0·979. Cross‐validation of the model resulted in a true predictive value for colorectal cancer of 93 per cent overall. Reliability of the breath analysis was maintained irrespective of cancer stage. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that analysis of exhaled VOCs can discriminate patients with colorectal cancer from those without. This finding may eventually lead to the creation of a smart online sensory device, capable of providing a binary answer (cancer/no cancer) and directing to further screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8444279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84442792021-09-16 Chemical signature of colorectal cancer: case–control study for profiling the breath print Altomare, D. F. Picciariello, A. Rotelli, M. T. De Fazio, M. Aresta, A. Zambonin, C. G. Vincenti, L. Trerotoli, P. De Vietro, N. BJS Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: Effective screening for colorectal cancer can reduce mortality by early detection of tumours and colonic polyps. An altered pattern of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath has been proposed as a potential non‐invasive diagnostic tool for detection of cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of breath‐testing for colorectal cancer screening and early diagnosis using an advanced breath sampler. METHODS: The exhaled breath of patients with colorectal cancer and non‐cancer controls with negative findings on colonoscopy was collected using the ReCIVA® Breath Sampler. This portable device is able to capture the alveolar breath fraction without environmental contamination. VOCs were desorbed thermally and analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The discriminatory ability of VOCs in detecting colorectal cancer was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for each VOC, followed by cross‐validation by the leave‐one‐out method, and by applying stepwise logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study included 83 patients with colorectal cancer and 90 non‐cancer controls. Fourteen VOCs were found to have significant discriminatory ability in detecting patients with colorectal cancer. The model with the diagnosis of cancer versus no cancer resulted in a statistically significant likelihood of discrimination of 173·45 (P < 0·001), with an area under the ROC curve of 0·979. Cross‐validation of the model resulted in a true predictive value for colorectal cancer of 93 per cent overall. Reliability of the breath analysis was maintained irrespective of cancer stage. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that analysis of exhaled VOCs can discriminate patients with colorectal cancer from those without. This finding may eventually lead to the creation of a smart online sensory device, capable of providing a binary answer (cancer/no cancer) and directing to further screening. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8444279/ /pubmed/32990407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50354 Text en © 2020 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Journal of Surgery Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Altomare, D. F.
Picciariello, A.
Rotelli, M. T.
De Fazio, M.
Aresta, A.
Zambonin, C. G.
Vincenti, L.
Trerotoli, P.
De Vietro, N.
Chemical signature of colorectal cancer: case–control study for profiling the breath print
title Chemical signature of colorectal cancer: case–control study for profiling the breath print
title_full Chemical signature of colorectal cancer: case–control study for profiling the breath print
title_fullStr Chemical signature of colorectal cancer: case–control study for profiling the breath print
title_full_unstemmed Chemical signature of colorectal cancer: case–control study for profiling the breath print
title_short Chemical signature of colorectal cancer: case–control study for profiling the breath print
title_sort chemical signature of colorectal cancer: case–control study for profiling the breath print
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32990407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50354
work_keys_str_mv AT altomaredf chemicalsignatureofcolorectalcancercasecontrolstudyforprofilingthebreathprint
AT picciarielloa chemicalsignatureofcolorectalcancercasecontrolstudyforprofilingthebreathprint
AT rotellimt chemicalsignatureofcolorectalcancercasecontrolstudyforprofilingthebreathprint
AT defaziom chemicalsignatureofcolorectalcancercasecontrolstudyforprofilingthebreathprint
AT arestaa chemicalsignatureofcolorectalcancercasecontrolstudyforprofilingthebreathprint
AT zambonincg chemicalsignatureofcolorectalcancercasecontrolstudyforprofilingthebreathprint
AT vincentil chemicalsignatureofcolorectalcancercasecontrolstudyforprofilingthebreathprint
AT trerotolip chemicalsignatureofcolorectalcancercasecontrolstudyforprofilingthebreathprint
AT devietron chemicalsignatureofcolorectalcancercasecontrolstudyforprofilingthebreathprint