Cargando…
Male cancer patient sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation: 10-year monocentric experience
BACKGROUND: Sperm cryopreservation, an effective method for preserving male fertility, is very advantageous for men suffering from cancer. Unfortunately, as both physicians and cancer patients are unaware of the possibilities for sperm cryopreservation, the data on evaluation of semen parameters and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34525944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-021-00140-w |
_version_ | 1784568480581812224 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Xiao Liu, Bo Liu, Shasha Xian, Yang Zhao, Wenrui Zhou, Bin Xiao, Xiao Wang, Li Zhu, Xiaofang Shu, Bizhen Jiang, Min Li, Fuping |
author_facet | Liu, Xiao Liu, Bo Liu, Shasha Xian, Yang Zhao, Wenrui Zhou, Bin Xiao, Xiao Wang, Li Zhu, Xiaofang Shu, Bizhen Jiang, Min Li, Fuping |
author_sort | Liu, Xiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sperm cryopreservation, an effective method for preserving male fertility, is very advantageous for men suffering from cancer. Unfortunately, as both physicians and cancer patients are unaware of the possibilities for sperm cryopreservation, the data on evaluation of semen parameters and disposition of cryopreserved samples among Chinese cancer patients are scarce. RESULTS: Male tumours were classified into six major types, germ cell tumours (26 %), haematological neoplasms (28 %), head and neck cancers (19 %), thoracic tumours (4 %), abdominal tumours (10 %), and others (13 %). Haematological neoplasm was the most prevalent cancer among our cohort of patients who opted for sperm banking, followed by germ cell tumours. Patients with germ cell tumours had the lowest pre-thaw and post-thaw seminal sperm concentrations. We separately compared patients with testicular tumours, lymphoma, and leukaemia, and found that leukaemia patients had the lowest pre-thaw sperm concentrations. Most cancer patients (58 %) chose to keep their specimens stored, while 31 % chose to discard the specimens. Over the years, only 13 patients (4 %) returned to use their spermatozoa by assisted reproductive technology. Of the stored samples, patients with germ cell tumours constituted the highest proportion (29.3 %). Moreover, the percentage of haematological neoplasm patients who had no spermatozoa frozen was the highest (46.2 %). CONCLUSIONS: The present data confirm the deleterious impact of various cancers on semen quality. Leukaemia was associated with the worst semen quality and the highest number of semen samples that could not be frozen. We suggest that sperm quality may have decreased even before anti-neoplastic treatment and that sperm banking before treatment should be strongly recommended for cancer patients. A sperm banking programme before gonadotoxic therapy requires close cooperation between assisted reproduction centres and cancer clinics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8444387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84443872021-09-16 Male cancer patient sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation: 10-year monocentric experience Liu, Xiao Liu, Bo Liu, Shasha Xian, Yang Zhao, Wenrui Zhou, Bin Xiao, Xiao Wang, Li Zhu, Xiaofang Shu, Bizhen Jiang, Min Li, Fuping Basic Clin Androl Research Article BACKGROUND: Sperm cryopreservation, an effective method for preserving male fertility, is very advantageous for men suffering from cancer. Unfortunately, as both physicians and cancer patients are unaware of the possibilities for sperm cryopreservation, the data on evaluation of semen parameters and disposition of cryopreserved samples among Chinese cancer patients are scarce. RESULTS: Male tumours were classified into six major types, germ cell tumours (26 %), haematological neoplasms (28 %), head and neck cancers (19 %), thoracic tumours (4 %), abdominal tumours (10 %), and others (13 %). Haematological neoplasm was the most prevalent cancer among our cohort of patients who opted for sperm banking, followed by germ cell tumours. Patients with germ cell tumours had the lowest pre-thaw and post-thaw seminal sperm concentrations. We separately compared patients with testicular tumours, lymphoma, and leukaemia, and found that leukaemia patients had the lowest pre-thaw sperm concentrations. Most cancer patients (58 %) chose to keep their specimens stored, while 31 % chose to discard the specimens. Over the years, only 13 patients (4 %) returned to use their spermatozoa by assisted reproductive technology. Of the stored samples, patients with germ cell tumours constituted the highest proportion (29.3 %). Moreover, the percentage of haematological neoplasm patients who had no spermatozoa frozen was the highest (46.2 %). CONCLUSIONS: The present data confirm the deleterious impact of various cancers on semen quality. Leukaemia was associated with the worst semen quality and the highest number of semen samples that could not be frozen. We suggest that sperm quality may have decreased even before anti-neoplastic treatment and that sperm banking before treatment should be strongly recommended for cancer patients. A sperm banking programme before gonadotoxic therapy requires close cooperation between assisted reproduction centres and cancer clinics. BioMed Central 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8444387/ /pubmed/34525944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-021-00140-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Xiao Liu, Bo Liu, Shasha Xian, Yang Zhao, Wenrui Zhou, Bin Xiao, Xiao Wang, Li Zhu, Xiaofang Shu, Bizhen Jiang, Min Li, Fuping Male cancer patient sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation: 10-year monocentric experience |
title | Male cancer patient sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation: 10-year monocentric experience |
title_full | Male cancer patient sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation: 10-year monocentric experience |
title_fullStr | Male cancer patient sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation: 10-year monocentric experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Male cancer patient sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation: 10-year monocentric experience |
title_short | Male cancer patient sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation: 10-year monocentric experience |
title_sort | male cancer patient sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation: 10-year monocentric experience |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34525944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-021-00140-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuxiao malecancerpatientspermcryopreservationforfertilitypreservation10yearmonocentricexperience AT liubo malecancerpatientspermcryopreservationforfertilitypreservation10yearmonocentricexperience AT liushasha malecancerpatientspermcryopreservationforfertilitypreservation10yearmonocentricexperience AT xianyang malecancerpatientspermcryopreservationforfertilitypreservation10yearmonocentricexperience AT zhaowenrui malecancerpatientspermcryopreservationforfertilitypreservation10yearmonocentricexperience AT zhoubin malecancerpatientspermcryopreservationforfertilitypreservation10yearmonocentricexperience AT xiaoxiao malecancerpatientspermcryopreservationforfertilitypreservation10yearmonocentricexperience AT wangli malecancerpatientspermcryopreservationforfertilitypreservation10yearmonocentricexperience AT zhuxiaofang malecancerpatientspermcryopreservationforfertilitypreservation10yearmonocentricexperience AT shubizhen malecancerpatientspermcryopreservationforfertilitypreservation10yearmonocentricexperience AT jiangmin malecancerpatientspermcryopreservationforfertilitypreservation10yearmonocentricexperience AT lifuping malecancerpatientspermcryopreservationforfertilitypreservation10yearmonocentricexperience |