Cargando…
Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors
BACKGROUND: To compare the changes in quantitative parameters and the size and degree of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) uptake of malignant tumor lesions between Bayesian penalized-likelihood (BPL) and non-BPL reconstruction algorithms. METHODS: Positron emission tomography/computed tomograph...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00664-7 |
_version_ | 1784568484454203392 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Yao Gao, Mei-jia Zhou, Jie Du, Fan Chen, Liang Huang, Zhong-ke Hu, Ji-bo Lou, Cen |
author_facet | Liu, Yao Gao, Mei-jia Zhou, Jie Du, Fan Chen, Liang Huang, Zhong-ke Hu, Ji-bo Lou, Cen |
author_sort | Liu, Yao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the changes in quantitative parameters and the size and degree of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) uptake of malignant tumor lesions between Bayesian penalized-likelihood (BPL) and non-BPL reconstruction algorithms. METHODS: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography images of 86 malignant tumor lesions were reconstructed using the algorithms of ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM), OSEM + time of flight (TOF), OSEM + TOF + point spread function (PSF), and BPL. [(18)F]FDG parameters of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and signal-to-background ratio (SBR) of these lesions were measured. Quantitative parameters between the different reconstruction algorithms were compared, and correlations between parameter variation and lesion size or the degree of [(18)F]FDG uptake were analyzed. RESULTS: After BPL reconstruction, SUVmax, SUVmean, and SBR were significantly increased, MTV was significantly decreased. The difference values of %ΔSUVmax, %ΔSUVmean, %ΔSBR, and the absolute value of %ΔMTV between BPL and OSEM + TOF were 40.00%, 38.50%, 33.60%, and 33.20%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those between BPL and OSEM + TOF + PSF. Similar results were observed in the comparison of OSEM and OSEM + TOF + PSF with BPL. The %ΔSUVmax, %ΔSUVmean, and %ΔSBR were all significantly negatively correlated with the size and degree of [(18)F]FDG uptake in the lesions, whereas significant positive correlations were observed for %ΔMTV and %ΔTLG. CONCLUSION: The BPL reconstruction algorithm significantly increased SUVmax, SUVmean, and SBR and decreased MTV of tumor lesions, especially in small or relatively hypometabolic lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8444406 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84444062021-09-16 Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors Liu, Yao Gao, Mei-jia Zhou, Jie Du, Fan Chen, Liang Huang, Zhong-ke Hu, Ji-bo Lou, Cen BMC Med Imaging Research BACKGROUND: To compare the changes in quantitative parameters and the size and degree of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) uptake of malignant tumor lesions between Bayesian penalized-likelihood (BPL) and non-BPL reconstruction algorithms. METHODS: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography images of 86 malignant tumor lesions were reconstructed using the algorithms of ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM), OSEM + time of flight (TOF), OSEM + TOF + point spread function (PSF), and BPL. [(18)F]FDG parameters of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and signal-to-background ratio (SBR) of these lesions were measured. Quantitative parameters between the different reconstruction algorithms were compared, and correlations between parameter variation and lesion size or the degree of [(18)F]FDG uptake were analyzed. RESULTS: After BPL reconstruction, SUVmax, SUVmean, and SBR were significantly increased, MTV was significantly decreased. The difference values of %ΔSUVmax, %ΔSUVmean, %ΔSBR, and the absolute value of %ΔMTV between BPL and OSEM + TOF were 40.00%, 38.50%, 33.60%, and 33.20%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those between BPL and OSEM + TOF + PSF. Similar results were observed in the comparison of OSEM and OSEM + TOF + PSF with BPL. The %ΔSUVmax, %ΔSUVmean, and %ΔSBR were all significantly negatively correlated with the size and degree of [(18)F]FDG uptake in the lesions, whereas significant positive correlations were observed for %ΔMTV and %ΔTLG. CONCLUSION: The BPL reconstruction algorithm significantly increased SUVmax, SUVmean, and SBR and decreased MTV of tumor lesions, especially in small or relatively hypometabolic lesions. BioMed Central 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8444406/ /pubmed/34530768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00664-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Liu, Yao Gao, Mei-jia Zhou, Jie Du, Fan Chen, Liang Huang, Zhong-ke Hu, Ji-bo Lou, Cen Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors |
title | Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors |
title_full | Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors |
title_fullStr | Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors |
title_full_unstemmed | Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors |
title_short | Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors |
title_sort | changes of [(18)f]fdg-pet/ct quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the bayesian penalized-likelihood pet reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00664-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyao changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors AT gaomeijia changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors AT zhoujie changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors AT dufan changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors AT chenliang changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors AT huangzhongke changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors AT hujibo changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors AT loucen changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors |