Cargando…

Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors

BACKGROUND: To compare the changes in quantitative parameters and the size and degree of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) uptake of malignant tumor lesions between Bayesian penalized-likelihood (BPL) and non-BPL reconstruction algorithms. METHODS: Positron emission tomography/computed tomograph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yao, Gao, Mei-jia, Zhou, Jie, Du, Fan, Chen, Liang, Huang, Zhong-ke, Hu, Ji-bo, Lou, Cen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00664-7
_version_ 1784568484454203392
author Liu, Yao
Gao, Mei-jia
Zhou, Jie
Du, Fan
Chen, Liang
Huang, Zhong-ke
Hu, Ji-bo
Lou, Cen
author_facet Liu, Yao
Gao, Mei-jia
Zhou, Jie
Du, Fan
Chen, Liang
Huang, Zhong-ke
Hu, Ji-bo
Lou, Cen
author_sort Liu, Yao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the changes in quantitative parameters and the size and degree of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) uptake of malignant tumor lesions between Bayesian penalized-likelihood (BPL) and non-BPL reconstruction algorithms. METHODS: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography images of 86 malignant tumor lesions were reconstructed using the algorithms of ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM), OSEM + time of flight (TOF), OSEM + TOF + point spread function (PSF), and BPL. [(18)F]FDG parameters of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and signal-to-background ratio (SBR) of these lesions were measured. Quantitative parameters between the different reconstruction algorithms were compared, and correlations between parameter variation and lesion size or the degree of [(18)F]FDG uptake were analyzed. RESULTS: After BPL reconstruction, SUVmax, SUVmean, and SBR were significantly increased, MTV was significantly decreased. The difference values of %ΔSUVmax, %ΔSUVmean, %ΔSBR, and the absolute value of %ΔMTV between BPL and OSEM + TOF were 40.00%, 38.50%, 33.60%, and 33.20%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those between BPL and OSEM + TOF + PSF. Similar results were observed in the comparison of OSEM and OSEM + TOF + PSF with BPL. The %ΔSUVmax, %ΔSUVmean, and %ΔSBR were all significantly negatively correlated with the size and degree of [(18)F]FDG uptake in the lesions, whereas significant positive correlations were observed for %ΔMTV and %ΔTLG. CONCLUSION: The BPL reconstruction algorithm significantly increased SUVmax, SUVmean, and SBR and decreased MTV of tumor lesions, especially in small or relatively hypometabolic lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8444406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84444062021-09-16 Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors Liu, Yao Gao, Mei-jia Zhou, Jie Du, Fan Chen, Liang Huang, Zhong-ke Hu, Ji-bo Lou, Cen BMC Med Imaging Research BACKGROUND: To compare the changes in quantitative parameters and the size and degree of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) uptake of malignant tumor lesions between Bayesian penalized-likelihood (BPL) and non-BPL reconstruction algorithms. METHODS: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography images of 86 malignant tumor lesions were reconstructed using the algorithms of ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM), OSEM + time of flight (TOF), OSEM + TOF + point spread function (PSF), and BPL. [(18)F]FDG parameters of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and signal-to-background ratio (SBR) of these lesions were measured. Quantitative parameters between the different reconstruction algorithms were compared, and correlations between parameter variation and lesion size or the degree of [(18)F]FDG uptake were analyzed. RESULTS: After BPL reconstruction, SUVmax, SUVmean, and SBR were significantly increased, MTV was significantly decreased. The difference values of %ΔSUVmax, %ΔSUVmean, %ΔSBR, and the absolute value of %ΔMTV between BPL and OSEM + TOF were 40.00%, 38.50%, 33.60%, and 33.20%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those between BPL and OSEM + TOF + PSF. Similar results were observed in the comparison of OSEM and OSEM + TOF + PSF with BPL. The %ΔSUVmax, %ΔSUVmean, and %ΔSBR were all significantly negatively correlated with the size and degree of [(18)F]FDG uptake in the lesions, whereas significant positive correlations were observed for %ΔMTV and %ΔTLG. CONCLUSION: The BPL reconstruction algorithm significantly increased SUVmax, SUVmean, and SBR and decreased MTV of tumor lesions, especially in small or relatively hypometabolic lesions. BioMed Central 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8444406/ /pubmed/34530768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00664-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Yao
Gao, Mei-jia
Zhou, Jie
Du, Fan
Chen, Liang
Huang, Zhong-ke
Hu, Ji-bo
Lou, Cen
Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors
title Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors
title_full Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors
title_fullStr Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors
title_full_unstemmed Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors
title_short Changes of [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors
title_sort changes of [(18)f]fdg-pet/ct quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the bayesian penalized-likelihood pet reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00664-7
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyao changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors
AT gaomeijia changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors
AT zhoujie changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors
AT dufan changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors
AT chenliang changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors
AT huangzhongke changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors
AT hujibo changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors
AT loucen changesof18ffdgpetctquantitativeparametersintumorlesionsbythebayesianpenalizedlikelihoodpetreconstructionalgorithmanditsinfluencingfactors