Cargando…

Effects of free maternal policies on quality and cost of care and outcomes: an integrative review

AIM: We conducted an integrative review of the global-free maternity (FM) policies and evaluated the quality of care (QoC) and cost and cost implications to provide lessons for universal health coverage (UHC). METHODOLOGY: Using integrative review methods proposed by Whittemore and Knafl (2005), we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oyugi, Boniface, Kendall, Sally, Peckham, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423621000529
_version_ 1784568496886120448
author Oyugi, Boniface
Kendall, Sally
Peckham, Stephen
author_facet Oyugi, Boniface
Kendall, Sally
Peckham, Stephen
author_sort Oyugi, Boniface
collection PubMed
description AIM: We conducted an integrative review of the global-free maternity (FM) policies and evaluated the quality of care (QoC) and cost and cost implications to provide lessons for universal health coverage (UHC). METHODOLOGY: Using integrative review methods proposed by Whittemore and Knafl (2005), we searched through EBSCO Host, ArticleFirst, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Emerald Insight, JSTOR, PubMed, Springer Link, Electronic collections online, and Google Scholar databases guided by the preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (PRISMA) guideline. Only empirical studies that described FM policies with components of quality and cost were included. There were 43 papers included, and the data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Forty-three studies that met the criteria were all from developing countries and had implemented different approaches of FM policy. Review findings demonstrated that some of the quality issues hindering the policies were poor management of complications, worsened referral systems, overburdening of staff because of increased utilisation, lack of transport, and low supply of stock. There were some quality improvements on monitoring vital signs by nurses and some procedures met the recommended standards. Equally, mothers still bear the burden of some costs such as the purchase of drugs, transport, informal payments despite policies being ‘free’. CONCLUSIONS: FM policies can reduce the financial burden on the households if well implemented and sustainably funded. Besides, they may also contribute to a decline in inequity between the rich and poor though not independently. In order to achieve the SDG goal of UHC by 2030, there is a need to promote awareness of the policy to the poor and disadvantaged women in rural areas to help narrow the inequality gap on utilisation and provide a sustainable form of transport through collaboration with partners to help reduce impoverishment of households. Also, there is a need to address elements such as cultural barriers and the role of traditional birth attendants which hinder women from seeking skilled care even when they are freely available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8444462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84444622021-09-24 Effects of free maternal policies on quality and cost of care and outcomes: an integrative review Oyugi, Boniface Kendall, Sally Peckham, Stephen Prim Health Care Res Dev Review Article AIM: We conducted an integrative review of the global-free maternity (FM) policies and evaluated the quality of care (QoC) and cost and cost implications to provide lessons for universal health coverage (UHC). METHODOLOGY: Using integrative review methods proposed by Whittemore and Knafl (2005), we searched through EBSCO Host, ArticleFirst, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Emerald Insight, JSTOR, PubMed, Springer Link, Electronic collections online, and Google Scholar databases guided by the preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (PRISMA) guideline. Only empirical studies that described FM policies with components of quality and cost were included. There were 43 papers included, and the data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Forty-three studies that met the criteria were all from developing countries and had implemented different approaches of FM policy. Review findings demonstrated that some of the quality issues hindering the policies were poor management of complications, worsened referral systems, overburdening of staff because of increased utilisation, lack of transport, and low supply of stock. There were some quality improvements on monitoring vital signs by nurses and some procedures met the recommended standards. Equally, mothers still bear the burden of some costs such as the purchase of drugs, transport, informal payments despite policies being ‘free’. CONCLUSIONS: FM policies can reduce the financial burden on the households if well implemented and sustainably funded. Besides, they may also contribute to a decline in inequity between the rich and poor though not independently. In order to achieve the SDG goal of UHC by 2030, there is a need to promote awareness of the policy to the poor and disadvantaged women in rural areas to help narrow the inequality gap on utilisation and provide a sustainable form of transport through collaboration with partners to help reduce impoverishment of households. Also, there is a need to address elements such as cultural barriers and the role of traditional birth attendants which hinder women from seeking skilled care even when they are freely available. Cambridge University Press 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8444462/ /pubmed/34521501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423621000529 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Oyugi, Boniface
Kendall, Sally
Peckham, Stephen
Effects of free maternal policies on quality and cost of care and outcomes: an integrative review
title Effects of free maternal policies on quality and cost of care and outcomes: an integrative review
title_full Effects of free maternal policies on quality and cost of care and outcomes: an integrative review
title_fullStr Effects of free maternal policies on quality and cost of care and outcomes: an integrative review
title_full_unstemmed Effects of free maternal policies on quality and cost of care and outcomes: an integrative review
title_short Effects of free maternal policies on quality and cost of care and outcomes: an integrative review
title_sort effects of free maternal policies on quality and cost of care and outcomes: an integrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423621000529
work_keys_str_mv AT oyugiboniface effectsoffreematernalpoliciesonqualityandcostofcareandoutcomesanintegrativereview
AT kendallsally effectsoffreematernalpoliciesonqualityandcostofcareandoutcomesanintegrativereview
AT peckhamstephen effectsoffreematernalpoliciesonqualityandcostofcareandoutcomesanintegrativereview