Cargando…

Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study

BACKGROUND: Disease monitoring is an important element of self-management of several chronic diseases. Pain monitoring has become very easily available, but the role in musculoskeletal pain conditions is not clear. Awareness of pain might be helpful for people to understand pain, but focusing on pai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kongsted, Alice, Jensen, Tue Secher, Doktor, Klaus, Hestbæk, Lise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00393-2
_version_ 1784568523381538816
author Kongsted, Alice
Jensen, Tue Secher
Doktor, Klaus
Hestbæk, Lise
author_facet Kongsted, Alice
Jensen, Tue Secher
Doktor, Klaus
Hestbæk, Lise
author_sort Kongsted, Alice
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Disease monitoring is an important element of self-management of several chronic diseases. Pain monitoring has become very easily available, but the role in musculoskeletal pain conditions is not clear. Awareness of pain might be helpful for people to understand pain, but focusing on pain may on the contrary negatively affect pain experience and behaviours. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential impact of pain monitoring on low back pain (LBP), specifically to determine if pain intensity, activity limitation and pain control, differed between patients with weekly pain monitoring over 12 months and patients with follow-ups at 2 weeks, 3 months and 12 months. METHODS: This was a non-randomised controlled study embedded in a cohort study with data collection November 1st 2016 to December 21st 2018. Adults seeking care for LBP were enrolled at the first visit to a chiropractor and followed with surveys after 2 weeks, 3 months and 12 months. Those enrolled first, n = 1,623, furthermore received weekly SMS-questions about pain frequency and pain intensity, whereas those enrolled next was the control group, n = 1,269 followed only by surveys. Outcomes at 12-months were compared, adjusting for group differences on baseline parameters. RESULTS: LBP intensity (0–10) was slightly lower at 12-months follow-up in the SMS group than the control group (adjusted beta − 0.40 (95% CI: − 0.62; − 0.19)). No relevant between-group differences were observed for activity limitation (0–100) (1.51 (95% CI: − 0.83; 3.85)) or ability to control pain (0–10) (− 0.08 (95% CI − 0.31; 0.15)). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent pain monitoring did not demonstrate any negative effects of weekly pain monitoring, and it was perhaps even helpful. The role of self-monitoring as part of self-managing LBP should be explored further including optimal frequencies, formats, and methods for feedback. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was not registered as a clinical trial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8444569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84445692021-09-17 Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study Kongsted, Alice Jensen, Tue Secher Doktor, Klaus Hestbæk, Lise Chiropr Man Therap Research BACKGROUND: Disease monitoring is an important element of self-management of several chronic diseases. Pain monitoring has become very easily available, but the role in musculoskeletal pain conditions is not clear. Awareness of pain might be helpful for people to understand pain, but focusing on pain may on the contrary negatively affect pain experience and behaviours. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential impact of pain monitoring on low back pain (LBP), specifically to determine if pain intensity, activity limitation and pain control, differed between patients with weekly pain monitoring over 12 months and patients with follow-ups at 2 weeks, 3 months and 12 months. METHODS: This was a non-randomised controlled study embedded in a cohort study with data collection November 1st 2016 to December 21st 2018. Adults seeking care for LBP were enrolled at the first visit to a chiropractor and followed with surveys after 2 weeks, 3 months and 12 months. Those enrolled first, n = 1,623, furthermore received weekly SMS-questions about pain frequency and pain intensity, whereas those enrolled next was the control group, n = 1,269 followed only by surveys. Outcomes at 12-months were compared, adjusting for group differences on baseline parameters. RESULTS: LBP intensity (0–10) was slightly lower at 12-months follow-up in the SMS group than the control group (adjusted beta − 0.40 (95% CI: − 0.62; − 0.19)). No relevant between-group differences were observed for activity limitation (0–100) (1.51 (95% CI: − 0.83; 3.85)) or ability to control pain (0–10) (− 0.08 (95% CI − 0.31; 0.15)). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent pain monitoring did not demonstrate any negative effects of weekly pain monitoring, and it was perhaps even helpful. The role of self-monitoring as part of self-managing LBP should be explored further including optimal frequencies, formats, and methods for feedback. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was not registered as a clinical trial. BioMed Central 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8444569/ /pubmed/34530882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00393-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kongsted, Alice
Jensen, Tue Secher
Doktor, Klaus
Hestbæk, Lise
Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study
title Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study
title_full Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study
title_fullStr Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study
title_short Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study
title_sort effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00393-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kongstedalice effectsofweeklypainmonitoringonbackpainoutcomesanonrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT jensentuesecher effectsofweeklypainmonitoringonbackpainoutcomesanonrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT doktorklaus effectsofweeklypainmonitoringonbackpainoutcomesanonrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT hestbæklise effectsofweeklypainmonitoringonbackpainoutcomesanonrandomisedcontrolledstudy