Cargando…
Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study
BACKGROUND: Disease monitoring is an important element of self-management of several chronic diseases. Pain monitoring has become very easily available, but the role in musculoskeletal pain conditions is not clear. Awareness of pain might be helpful for people to understand pain, but focusing on pai...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00393-2 |
_version_ | 1784568523381538816 |
---|---|
author | Kongsted, Alice Jensen, Tue Secher Doktor, Klaus Hestbæk, Lise |
author_facet | Kongsted, Alice Jensen, Tue Secher Doktor, Klaus Hestbæk, Lise |
author_sort | Kongsted, Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Disease monitoring is an important element of self-management of several chronic diseases. Pain monitoring has become very easily available, but the role in musculoskeletal pain conditions is not clear. Awareness of pain might be helpful for people to understand pain, but focusing on pain may on the contrary negatively affect pain experience and behaviours. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential impact of pain monitoring on low back pain (LBP), specifically to determine if pain intensity, activity limitation and pain control, differed between patients with weekly pain monitoring over 12 months and patients with follow-ups at 2 weeks, 3 months and 12 months. METHODS: This was a non-randomised controlled study embedded in a cohort study with data collection November 1st 2016 to December 21st 2018. Adults seeking care for LBP were enrolled at the first visit to a chiropractor and followed with surveys after 2 weeks, 3 months and 12 months. Those enrolled first, n = 1,623, furthermore received weekly SMS-questions about pain frequency and pain intensity, whereas those enrolled next was the control group, n = 1,269 followed only by surveys. Outcomes at 12-months were compared, adjusting for group differences on baseline parameters. RESULTS: LBP intensity (0–10) was slightly lower at 12-months follow-up in the SMS group than the control group (adjusted beta − 0.40 (95% CI: − 0.62; − 0.19)). No relevant between-group differences were observed for activity limitation (0–100) (1.51 (95% CI: − 0.83; 3.85)) or ability to control pain (0–10) (− 0.08 (95% CI − 0.31; 0.15)). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent pain monitoring did not demonstrate any negative effects of weekly pain monitoring, and it was perhaps even helpful. The role of self-monitoring as part of self-managing LBP should be explored further including optimal frequencies, formats, and methods for feedback. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was not registered as a clinical trial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8444569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84445692021-09-17 Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study Kongsted, Alice Jensen, Tue Secher Doktor, Klaus Hestbæk, Lise Chiropr Man Therap Research BACKGROUND: Disease monitoring is an important element of self-management of several chronic diseases. Pain monitoring has become very easily available, but the role in musculoskeletal pain conditions is not clear. Awareness of pain might be helpful for people to understand pain, but focusing on pain may on the contrary negatively affect pain experience and behaviours. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential impact of pain monitoring on low back pain (LBP), specifically to determine if pain intensity, activity limitation and pain control, differed between patients with weekly pain monitoring over 12 months and patients with follow-ups at 2 weeks, 3 months and 12 months. METHODS: This was a non-randomised controlled study embedded in a cohort study with data collection November 1st 2016 to December 21st 2018. Adults seeking care for LBP were enrolled at the first visit to a chiropractor and followed with surveys after 2 weeks, 3 months and 12 months. Those enrolled first, n = 1,623, furthermore received weekly SMS-questions about pain frequency and pain intensity, whereas those enrolled next was the control group, n = 1,269 followed only by surveys. Outcomes at 12-months were compared, adjusting for group differences on baseline parameters. RESULTS: LBP intensity (0–10) was slightly lower at 12-months follow-up in the SMS group than the control group (adjusted beta − 0.40 (95% CI: − 0.62; − 0.19)). No relevant between-group differences were observed for activity limitation (0–100) (1.51 (95% CI: − 0.83; 3.85)) or ability to control pain (0–10) (− 0.08 (95% CI − 0.31; 0.15)). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent pain monitoring did not demonstrate any negative effects of weekly pain monitoring, and it was perhaps even helpful. The role of self-monitoring as part of self-managing LBP should be explored further including optimal frequencies, formats, and methods for feedback. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was not registered as a clinical trial. BioMed Central 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8444569/ /pubmed/34530882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00393-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kongsted, Alice Jensen, Tue Secher Doktor, Klaus Hestbæk, Lise Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study |
title | Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study |
title_full | Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study |
title_fullStr | Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study |
title_short | Effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study |
title_sort | effects of weekly pain monitoring on back pain outcomes: a non-randomised controlled study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8444569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00393-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kongstedalice effectsofweeklypainmonitoringonbackpainoutcomesanonrandomisedcontrolledstudy AT jensentuesecher effectsofweeklypainmonitoringonbackpainoutcomesanonrandomisedcontrolledstudy AT doktorklaus effectsofweeklypainmonitoringonbackpainoutcomesanonrandomisedcontrolledstudy AT hestbæklise effectsofweeklypainmonitoringonbackpainoutcomesanonrandomisedcontrolledstudy |