Cargando…

Comparison of Long-Term Complications of Using Amplatzer Ductal Occluder and Ventricular Septal Defect Occluder for Transcatheter Ventricular Septal Defect Closure

BACKGROUND: Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) is the most common type of congenital heart disease and perimembranous type is the commonest form of these defects. Trans-catheter management of these defects is a challenging procedure. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare of Trans-cathete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghaderian, Mehdi, Salemi, Negin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8445135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584620
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_166_20
_version_ 1784568591876620288
author Ghaderian, Mehdi
Salemi, Negin
author_facet Ghaderian, Mehdi
Salemi, Negin
author_sort Ghaderian, Mehdi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) is the most common type of congenital heart disease and perimembranous type is the commonest form of these defects. Trans-catheter management of these defects is a challenging procedure. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare of Trans-catheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect (PMVSD) using Amplatzer Ductal Occluder (ADO) and VSD occluder and their complications and follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2013 and April 2019, 69 patients underwent percutaneous closure of PMVSD using ADO (29 patients) and VSD occluder (40 patients). After obtaining the size of VSD from the ventriculogram at least 2 mm larger than the orifice diameter of VSD at the right ventricular side was chosen. The devices were positioned after verification of the proper device position by echocardiography, aortogram and left ventriculography. RESULTS: The mean age of patients were 9.07 ± 7.73 years, mean weight 26.12 ±16.25 kg. The mean defect size of the right ventricular orifice and device sizes were 5.54 ± 1.83 mm 7.72 ± 1.94 mm respectively. Small residual shunts were seen at the completion of the procedure, but they disappeared during follow-up in all but one patient. Two patients had mild AI before the procedure in ADO group that disappeared during the follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 3.3 ± 1.7 years (range 1 to 6 years). Complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) was seen in one patient (VSD occluder) during the procedure that disappeared after the retrieval of the device. Major complication or death was not observed in our study. CONCLUSIONS: Trans-catheter closures of PMVSD with ADO or VSD occluder had similar effects in these patients and are safe and effective treatment associated with excellent success and closure rates. Long-term follow-up in a large number of patients is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8445135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84451352021-09-27 Comparison of Long-Term Complications of Using Amplatzer Ductal Occluder and Ventricular Septal Defect Occluder for Transcatheter Ventricular Septal Defect Closure Ghaderian, Mehdi Salemi, Negin Heart Views Original Article BACKGROUND: Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) is the most common type of congenital heart disease and perimembranous type is the commonest form of these defects. Trans-catheter management of these defects is a challenging procedure. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare of Trans-catheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect (PMVSD) using Amplatzer Ductal Occluder (ADO) and VSD occluder and their complications and follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2013 and April 2019, 69 patients underwent percutaneous closure of PMVSD using ADO (29 patients) and VSD occluder (40 patients). After obtaining the size of VSD from the ventriculogram at least 2 mm larger than the orifice diameter of VSD at the right ventricular side was chosen. The devices were positioned after verification of the proper device position by echocardiography, aortogram and left ventriculography. RESULTS: The mean age of patients were 9.07 ± 7.73 years, mean weight 26.12 ±16.25 kg. The mean defect size of the right ventricular orifice and device sizes were 5.54 ± 1.83 mm 7.72 ± 1.94 mm respectively. Small residual shunts were seen at the completion of the procedure, but they disappeared during follow-up in all but one patient. Two patients had mild AI before the procedure in ADO group that disappeared during the follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 3.3 ± 1.7 years (range 1 to 6 years). Complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) was seen in one patient (VSD occluder) during the procedure that disappeared after the retrieval of the device. Major complication or death was not observed in our study. CONCLUSIONS: Trans-catheter closures of PMVSD with ADO or VSD occluder had similar effects in these patients and are safe and effective treatment associated with excellent success and closure rates. Long-term follow-up in a large number of patients is warranted. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8445135/ /pubmed/34584620 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_166_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Heart Views https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghaderian, Mehdi
Salemi, Negin
Comparison of Long-Term Complications of Using Amplatzer Ductal Occluder and Ventricular Septal Defect Occluder for Transcatheter Ventricular Septal Defect Closure
title Comparison of Long-Term Complications of Using Amplatzer Ductal Occluder and Ventricular Septal Defect Occluder for Transcatheter Ventricular Septal Defect Closure
title_full Comparison of Long-Term Complications of Using Amplatzer Ductal Occluder and Ventricular Septal Defect Occluder for Transcatheter Ventricular Septal Defect Closure
title_fullStr Comparison of Long-Term Complications of Using Amplatzer Ductal Occluder and Ventricular Septal Defect Occluder for Transcatheter Ventricular Septal Defect Closure
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Long-Term Complications of Using Amplatzer Ductal Occluder and Ventricular Septal Defect Occluder for Transcatheter Ventricular Septal Defect Closure
title_short Comparison of Long-Term Complications of Using Amplatzer Ductal Occluder and Ventricular Septal Defect Occluder for Transcatheter Ventricular Septal Defect Closure
title_sort comparison of long-term complications of using amplatzer ductal occluder and ventricular septal defect occluder for transcatheter ventricular septal defect closure
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8445135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584620
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_166_20
work_keys_str_mv AT ghaderianmehdi comparisonoflongtermcomplicationsofusingamplatzerductaloccluderandventricularseptaldefectoccluderfortranscatheterventricularseptaldefectclosure
AT saleminegin comparisonoflongtermcomplicationsofusingamplatzerductaloccluderandventricularseptaldefectoccluderfortranscatheterventricularseptaldefectclosure