Cargando…

Changes to cigarette packaging influence US consumers’ choices: Results of two discrete-choice experiments to inform regulation

INTRODUCTION: While plain packaging of tobacco products has emerged as a policy intervention to reduce smoking, regulators in the US have limited ability to implement plain packaging. We sought to identify the impact of subtle changes to cigarette packaging (Study 1) and how packaging design influen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Joseph G. L., O’Brien, Kevin F., Blanchflower, Tiffany M., Swanson, Gunnar, Averett, Paige E., Gregory, Kyle R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8445337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34602934
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/140137
_version_ 1784568633568002048
author Lee, Joseph G. L.
O’Brien, Kevin F.
Blanchflower, Tiffany M.
Swanson, Gunnar
Averett, Paige E.
Gregory, Kyle R.
author_facet Lee, Joseph G. L.
O’Brien, Kevin F.
Blanchflower, Tiffany M.
Swanson, Gunnar
Averett, Paige E.
Gregory, Kyle R.
author_sort Lee, Joseph G. L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While plain packaging of tobacco products has emerged as a policy intervention to reduce smoking, regulators in the US have limited ability to implement plain packaging. We sought to identify the impact of subtle changes to cigarette packaging (Study 1) and how packaging design influenced participant choices based on appeal, harm, and style (Study 2). METHODS: We conducted two discrete-choice experiments with US adult smokers online in 2018. In Study 1 (n=285), we assessed participants’ selections based on subtle changes to pack design features (dimensions, color saturation, logo size). In Study 2 (n=284), we assessed three choices in which participants selected packs based on appeal, harmfulness, and best match to their personal style. Study 2 packs varied by color hue, design with different levels of organic labeling and natural imagery, and color saturation. RESULTS: Pack designs influenced smokers’ choices. In Study 1, pack dimensions and color saturation emerged as the most important features, and, in Study 2, design and color hue were the most influential characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Regulators should consider how the design of cigarette packages may influence consumers’ perceptions and choices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8445337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84453372021-10-01 Changes to cigarette packaging influence US consumers’ choices: Results of two discrete-choice experiments to inform regulation Lee, Joseph G. L. O’Brien, Kevin F. Blanchflower, Tiffany M. Swanson, Gunnar Averett, Paige E. Gregory, Kyle R. Tob Induc Dis Research Paper INTRODUCTION: While plain packaging of tobacco products has emerged as a policy intervention to reduce smoking, regulators in the US have limited ability to implement plain packaging. We sought to identify the impact of subtle changes to cigarette packaging (Study 1) and how packaging design influenced participant choices based on appeal, harm, and style (Study 2). METHODS: We conducted two discrete-choice experiments with US adult smokers online in 2018. In Study 1 (n=285), we assessed participants’ selections based on subtle changes to pack design features (dimensions, color saturation, logo size). In Study 2 (n=284), we assessed three choices in which participants selected packs based on appeal, harmfulness, and best match to their personal style. Study 2 packs varied by color hue, design with different levels of organic labeling and natural imagery, and color saturation. RESULTS: Pack designs influenced smokers’ choices. In Study 1, pack dimensions and color saturation emerged as the most important features, and, in Study 2, design and color hue were the most influential characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Regulators should consider how the design of cigarette packages may influence consumers’ perceptions and choices. European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8445337/ /pubmed/34602934 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/140137 Text en © 2021 Lee J.G.L. et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Lee, Joseph G. L.
O’Brien, Kevin F.
Blanchflower, Tiffany M.
Swanson, Gunnar
Averett, Paige E.
Gregory, Kyle R.
Changes to cigarette packaging influence US consumers’ choices: Results of two discrete-choice experiments to inform regulation
title Changes to cigarette packaging influence US consumers’ choices: Results of two discrete-choice experiments to inform regulation
title_full Changes to cigarette packaging influence US consumers’ choices: Results of two discrete-choice experiments to inform regulation
title_fullStr Changes to cigarette packaging influence US consumers’ choices: Results of two discrete-choice experiments to inform regulation
title_full_unstemmed Changes to cigarette packaging influence US consumers’ choices: Results of two discrete-choice experiments to inform regulation
title_short Changes to cigarette packaging influence US consumers’ choices: Results of two discrete-choice experiments to inform regulation
title_sort changes to cigarette packaging influence us consumers’ choices: results of two discrete-choice experiments to inform regulation
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8445337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34602934
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/140137
work_keys_str_mv AT leejosephgl changestocigarettepackaginginfluenceusconsumerschoicesresultsoftwodiscretechoiceexperimentstoinformregulation
AT obrienkevinf changestocigarettepackaginginfluenceusconsumerschoicesresultsoftwodiscretechoiceexperimentstoinformregulation
AT blanchflowertiffanym changestocigarettepackaginginfluenceusconsumerschoicesresultsoftwodiscretechoiceexperimentstoinformregulation
AT swansongunnar changestocigarettepackaginginfluenceusconsumerschoicesresultsoftwodiscretechoiceexperimentstoinformregulation
AT averettpaigee changestocigarettepackaginginfluenceusconsumerschoicesresultsoftwodiscretechoiceexperimentstoinformregulation
AT gregorykyler changestocigarettepackaginginfluenceusconsumerschoicesresultsoftwodiscretechoiceexperimentstoinformregulation