Cargando…

Revisiting the placental clock: Early corticotrophin-releasing hormone rise in recurrent preterm birth

OBJECTIVE: To determine if maternal plasma CRH and preterm birth history were associated with recurrent preterm birth risk in a high-risk cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of pregnant women with a prior preterm birth ≤35 weeks receiving 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate for the prevention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herrera, Christina L., Bowman, Maria E., McIntire, Donald D., Nelson, David B., Smith, Roger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8445461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34529698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257422
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To determine if maternal plasma CRH and preterm birth history were associated with recurrent preterm birth risk in a high-risk cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of pregnant women with a prior preterm birth ≤35 weeks receiving 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate for the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. All women with a 24-week blood sample were included. Maternal plasma CRH level at 24- and 32-weeks’ gestation was measured using both enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and extracted radioimmunoassay (RIA) technologies. The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks. The association of CRH, prior preterm birth history, and the two combined was assessed in relation to recurrent preterm birth risk. RESULTS: Recurrent preterm birth in this cohort of 169 women was 24.9%. Comparing women who subsequently delivered <37 versus ≥37 weeks, mean levels of CRH measured by RIA were significantly different at 24 weeks (111.1±87.5 vs. 66.1±45.4 pg/mL, P = .002) and 32 weeks (440.9±275.6 vs. 280.2±214.5 pg/mL, P = .003). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) at 24 and 32 weeks for (1) CRH level was 0.68 (95% CI 0.59–0.78) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.59–0.81), (2) prior preterm birth history was 0.75 (95% CI 0.67–0.83) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.69–0.87), and (3) combined was 0.81 (95% CI 0.73–0.88, P = .001) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.72–0.90, P = .01) respectively for delivery <37 weeks. CRH measured by ELISA failed to correlate with gestational age or other clinical parameters. CONCLUSION: In women with a prior preterm birth, CRH levels were higher and had an earlier rise in women who experienced recurrent preterm birth. Second trimester CRH may be useful in identifying a sub-group of women with preterm birth due to early activation of the placenta-fetal adrenal axis. Assay methodology is a variable that contributes to difficulties in reproducibility of CRH levels in the obstetric literature.