Cargando…

Inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: Comparison of computational updating models

In visual search tasks, repeating features or the position of the target results in faster response times. Such inter-trial ‘priming’ effects occur not just for repetitions from the immediately preceding trial but also from trials further back. A paradigm known to produce particularly long-lasting i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allenmark, Fredrik, Gokce, Ahu, Geyer, Thomas, Zinchenko, Artyom, Müller, Hermann J., Shi, Zhuanghua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8445473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34478446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009332
_version_ 1784568667515650048
author Allenmark, Fredrik
Gokce, Ahu
Geyer, Thomas
Zinchenko, Artyom
Müller, Hermann J.
Shi, Zhuanghua
author_facet Allenmark, Fredrik
Gokce, Ahu
Geyer, Thomas
Zinchenko, Artyom
Müller, Hermann J.
Shi, Zhuanghua
author_sort Allenmark, Fredrik
collection PubMed
description In visual search tasks, repeating features or the position of the target results in faster response times. Such inter-trial ‘priming’ effects occur not just for repetitions from the immediately preceding trial but also from trials further back. A paradigm known to produce particularly long-lasting inter-trial effects–of the target-defining feature, target position, and response (feature)–is the ‘priming of pop-out’ (PoP) paradigm, which typically uses sparse search displays and random swapping across trials of target- and distractor-defining features. However, the mechanisms underlying these inter-trial effects are still not well understood. To address this, we applied a modeling framework combining an evidence accumulation (EA) model with different computational updating rules of the model parameters (i.e., the drift rate and starting point of EA) for different aspects of stimulus history, to data from a (previously published) PoP study that had revealed significant inter-trial effects from several trials back for repetitions of the target color, the target position, and (response-critical) target feature. By performing a systematic model comparison, we aimed to determine which EA model parameter and which updating rule for that parameter best accounts for each inter-trial effect and the associated n-back temporal profile. We found that, in general, our modeling framework could accurately predict the n-back temporal profiles. Further, target color- and position-based inter-trial effects were best understood as arising from redistribution of a limited-capacity weight resource which determines the EA rate. In contrast, response-based inter-trial effects were best explained by a bias of the starting point towards the response associated with a previous target; this bias appeared largely tied to the position of the target. These findings elucidate how our cognitive system continually tracks, and updates an internal predictive model of, a number of separable stimulus and response parameters in order to optimize task performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8445473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84454732021-09-17 Inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: Comparison of computational updating models Allenmark, Fredrik Gokce, Ahu Geyer, Thomas Zinchenko, Artyom Müller, Hermann J. Shi, Zhuanghua PLoS Comput Biol Research Article In visual search tasks, repeating features or the position of the target results in faster response times. Such inter-trial ‘priming’ effects occur not just for repetitions from the immediately preceding trial but also from trials further back. A paradigm known to produce particularly long-lasting inter-trial effects–of the target-defining feature, target position, and response (feature)–is the ‘priming of pop-out’ (PoP) paradigm, which typically uses sparse search displays and random swapping across trials of target- and distractor-defining features. However, the mechanisms underlying these inter-trial effects are still not well understood. To address this, we applied a modeling framework combining an evidence accumulation (EA) model with different computational updating rules of the model parameters (i.e., the drift rate and starting point of EA) for different aspects of stimulus history, to data from a (previously published) PoP study that had revealed significant inter-trial effects from several trials back for repetitions of the target color, the target position, and (response-critical) target feature. By performing a systematic model comparison, we aimed to determine which EA model parameter and which updating rule for that parameter best accounts for each inter-trial effect and the associated n-back temporal profile. We found that, in general, our modeling framework could accurately predict the n-back temporal profiles. Further, target color- and position-based inter-trial effects were best understood as arising from redistribution of a limited-capacity weight resource which determines the EA rate. In contrast, response-based inter-trial effects were best explained by a bias of the starting point towards the response associated with a previous target; this bias appeared largely tied to the position of the target. These findings elucidate how our cognitive system continually tracks, and updates an internal predictive model of, a number of separable stimulus and response parameters in order to optimize task performance. Public Library of Science 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8445473/ /pubmed/34478446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009332 Text en © 2021 Allenmark et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Allenmark, Fredrik
Gokce, Ahu
Geyer, Thomas
Zinchenko, Artyom
Müller, Hermann J.
Shi, Zhuanghua
Inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: Comparison of computational updating models
title Inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: Comparison of computational updating models
title_full Inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: Comparison of computational updating models
title_fullStr Inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: Comparison of computational updating models
title_full_unstemmed Inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: Comparison of computational updating models
title_short Inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: Comparison of computational updating models
title_sort inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: comparison of computational updating models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8445473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34478446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009332
work_keys_str_mv AT allenmarkfredrik intertrialeffectsinprimingofpopoutcomparisonofcomputationalupdatingmodels
AT gokceahu intertrialeffectsinprimingofpopoutcomparisonofcomputationalupdatingmodels
AT geyerthomas intertrialeffectsinprimingofpopoutcomparisonofcomputationalupdatingmodels
AT zinchenkoartyom intertrialeffectsinprimingofpopoutcomparisonofcomputationalupdatingmodels
AT mullerhermannj intertrialeffectsinprimingofpopoutcomparisonofcomputationalupdatingmodels
AT shizhuanghua intertrialeffectsinprimingofpopoutcomparisonofcomputationalupdatingmodels