Cargando…

Review of the Current Trends in Clinical Trials Involving Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

In 2006, the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) was presented to the world, paving the way for the development of a magnitude of novel therapeutic alternatives, addressing a diverse range of diseases. However, despite the immense cell therapy potential, relatively few clinical trials evaluating iP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jennifer Yejean, Nam, Yoojun, Rim, Yeri Alice, Ju, Ji Hyeon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8445612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34532844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12015-021-10262-3
_version_ 1784568686155137024
author Kim, Jennifer Yejean
Nam, Yoojun
Rim, Yeri Alice
Ju, Ji Hyeon
author_facet Kim, Jennifer Yejean
Nam, Yoojun
Rim, Yeri Alice
Ju, Ji Hyeon
author_sort Kim, Jennifer Yejean
collection PubMed
description In 2006, the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) was presented to the world, paving the way for the development of a magnitude of novel therapeutic alternatives, addressing a diverse range of diseases. However, despite the immense cell therapy potential, relatively few clinical trials evaluating iPSC-technology have actually translated into interventional, clinically applied treatment regimens. Herein, our aim was to determine trends in globally conducted clinical trials involving iPSCs. Data were derived both from well-known registries recording clinical trials from across the globe, and databases from individual countries. Comparisons were firstly drawn between observational and interventional studies before the latter was further analyzed in terms of therapeutic and nontherapeutic trials. Our main observations included global distribution, purpose, target size, and types of disorder relevant to evaluated trials. In terms of nontherapeutic trials, the USA conducted the majority, a large average number of participants—187—was included in the trials, and studies on circulatory system disorders comprised a slightly higher proportion of total studies. Conversely, Japan was the frontrunner in terms of conducting therapeutic trials, and the average number of participants was much lower, at roughly 29. Disorders of the circulatory, as well as nervous and visual systems, were all studied in equal measure. This review highlights the impact that iPSC-based cell therapies can have, should development thereof gain more traction. We lastly considered a few companies that are actively utilizing iPSCs in the development of therapies for various diseases, for whom the global trends in clinical trials could become increasingly important. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12015-021-10262-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8445612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84456122021-09-17 Review of the Current Trends in Clinical Trials Involving Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Kim, Jennifer Yejean Nam, Yoojun Rim, Yeri Alice Ju, Ji Hyeon Stem Cell Rev Rep Article In 2006, the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) was presented to the world, paving the way for the development of a magnitude of novel therapeutic alternatives, addressing a diverse range of diseases. However, despite the immense cell therapy potential, relatively few clinical trials evaluating iPSC-technology have actually translated into interventional, clinically applied treatment regimens. Herein, our aim was to determine trends in globally conducted clinical trials involving iPSCs. Data were derived both from well-known registries recording clinical trials from across the globe, and databases from individual countries. Comparisons were firstly drawn between observational and interventional studies before the latter was further analyzed in terms of therapeutic and nontherapeutic trials. Our main observations included global distribution, purpose, target size, and types of disorder relevant to evaluated trials. In terms of nontherapeutic trials, the USA conducted the majority, a large average number of participants—187—was included in the trials, and studies on circulatory system disorders comprised a slightly higher proportion of total studies. Conversely, Japan was the frontrunner in terms of conducting therapeutic trials, and the average number of participants was much lower, at roughly 29. Disorders of the circulatory, as well as nervous and visual systems, were all studied in equal measure. This review highlights the impact that iPSC-based cell therapies can have, should development thereof gain more traction. We lastly considered a few companies that are actively utilizing iPSCs in the development of therapies for various diseases, for whom the global trends in clinical trials could become increasingly important. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12015-021-10262-3. Springer US 2021-09-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8445612/ /pubmed/34532844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12015-021-10262-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Jennifer Yejean
Nam, Yoojun
Rim, Yeri Alice
Ju, Ji Hyeon
Review of the Current Trends in Clinical Trials Involving Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
title Review of the Current Trends in Clinical Trials Involving Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
title_full Review of the Current Trends in Clinical Trials Involving Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
title_fullStr Review of the Current Trends in Clinical Trials Involving Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
title_full_unstemmed Review of the Current Trends in Clinical Trials Involving Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
title_short Review of the Current Trends in Clinical Trials Involving Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
title_sort review of the current trends in clinical trials involving induced pluripotent stem cells
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8445612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34532844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12015-021-10262-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjenniferyejean reviewofthecurrenttrendsinclinicaltrialsinvolvinginducedpluripotentstemcells
AT namyoojun reviewofthecurrenttrendsinclinicaltrialsinvolvinginducedpluripotentstemcells
AT rimyerialice reviewofthecurrenttrendsinclinicaltrialsinvolvinginducedpluripotentstemcells
AT jujihyeon reviewofthecurrenttrendsinclinicaltrialsinvolvinginducedpluripotentstemcells