Cargando…

Possibility of new shielding device for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Background and study aims  Infection control is essential when performing endoscopic procedures, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, we have developed a new shielding device called STEP for infection control in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients and methods  STEP consists of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kikuchi, Daisuke, Ariyoshi, Daiki, Suzuki, Yugo, Ochiai, Yorinari, Odagiri, Hiroyuki, Hayasaka, Junnosuke, Tanaka, Masami, Morishima, Tetsuya, Kimura, Keita, Ezawa, Hiroshi, Iwamoto, Risa, Matsuwaki, Yoshinori, Hoteya, Shu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8445671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1523-8959
_version_ 1784568698751680512
author Kikuchi, Daisuke
Ariyoshi, Daiki
Suzuki, Yugo
Ochiai, Yorinari
Odagiri, Hiroyuki
Hayasaka, Junnosuke
Tanaka, Masami
Morishima, Tetsuya
Kimura, Keita
Ezawa, Hiroshi
Iwamoto, Risa
Matsuwaki, Yoshinori
Hoteya, Shu
author_facet Kikuchi, Daisuke
Ariyoshi, Daiki
Suzuki, Yugo
Ochiai, Yorinari
Odagiri, Hiroyuki
Hayasaka, Junnosuke
Tanaka, Masami
Morishima, Tetsuya
Kimura, Keita
Ezawa, Hiroshi
Iwamoto, Risa
Matsuwaki, Yoshinori
Hoteya, Shu
author_sort Kikuchi, Daisuke
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Infection control is essential when performing endoscopic procedures, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, we have developed a new shielding device called STEP for infection control in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients and methods  STEP consists of a mask worn by the patient and a drape that is connected to the mask and covers the endoscope. A suction tube attached to the mask prevents aerosols from spreading. The endoscopist operates the endoscope through the drape. Three endoscopists performed a total of 18 examinations using an upper endoscopy training model with and without STEP. Endoscopic images were evaluated by three other endoscopists, using a visual analog scale. We also simulated contact, droplet, and aerosol infection and evaluated the utility of STEP. Results  All examinations were conducted without a problem. Mean procedure time was 126.3 ± 11.6 seconds with STEP and 122.3 ± 10.0 seconds without STEP. The mean visual analog score was 90.7 ± 10.1 with STEP and 90.4 ± 10.0 without STEP. In the contact model, adherence of simulated contaminants was 4.9 ± 1.4 % without STEP and 0 % with STEP. In the droplet model, the number of simulated contaminants attached to the paper was 338 273 ± 90 735 pixels without STEP and 0 with STEP. In the aerosol model, the total number of particles was 346 837 ± 9485 without STEP and was significantly reduced to 222 ± 174 with STEP. Conclusions  No effect on examination time or endoscopic image quality was observed when using STEP in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Using STEP reduced the diffusion of simulated contaminants in all three infection models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8445671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84456712021-09-17 Possibility of new shielding device for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Kikuchi, Daisuke Ariyoshi, Daiki Suzuki, Yugo Ochiai, Yorinari Odagiri, Hiroyuki Hayasaka, Junnosuke Tanaka, Masami Morishima, Tetsuya Kimura, Keita Ezawa, Hiroshi Iwamoto, Risa Matsuwaki, Yoshinori Hoteya, Shu Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Infection control is essential when performing endoscopic procedures, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, we have developed a new shielding device called STEP for infection control in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients and methods  STEP consists of a mask worn by the patient and a drape that is connected to the mask and covers the endoscope. A suction tube attached to the mask prevents aerosols from spreading. The endoscopist operates the endoscope through the drape. Three endoscopists performed a total of 18 examinations using an upper endoscopy training model with and without STEP. Endoscopic images were evaluated by three other endoscopists, using a visual analog scale. We also simulated contact, droplet, and aerosol infection and evaluated the utility of STEP. Results  All examinations were conducted without a problem. Mean procedure time was 126.3 ± 11.6 seconds with STEP and 122.3 ± 10.0 seconds without STEP. The mean visual analog score was 90.7 ± 10.1 with STEP and 90.4 ± 10.0 without STEP. In the contact model, adherence of simulated contaminants was 4.9 ± 1.4 % without STEP and 0 % with STEP. In the droplet model, the number of simulated contaminants attached to the paper was 338 273 ± 90 735 pixels without STEP and 0 with STEP. In the aerosol model, the total number of particles was 346 837 ± 9485 without STEP and was significantly reduced to 222 ± 174 with STEP. Conclusions  No effect on examination time or endoscopic image quality was observed when using STEP in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Using STEP reduced the diffusion of simulated contaminants in all three infection models. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8445671/ /pubmed/34540547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1523-8959 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Kikuchi, Daisuke
Ariyoshi, Daiki
Suzuki, Yugo
Ochiai, Yorinari
Odagiri, Hiroyuki
Hayasaka, Junnosuke
Tanaka, Masami
Morishima, Tetsuya
Kimura, Keita
Ezawa, Hiroshi
Iwamoto, Risa
Matsuwaki, Yoshinori
Hoteya, Shu
Possibility of new shielding device for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title Possibility of new shielding device for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_full Possibility of new shielding device for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_fullStr Possibility of new shielding device for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Possibility of new shielding device for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_short Possibility of new shielding device for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_sort possibility of new shielding device for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8445671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1523-8959
work_keys_str_mv AT kikuchidaisuke possibilityofnewshieldingdeviceforuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT ariyoshidaiki possibilityofnewshieldingdeviceforuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT suzukiyugo possibilityofnewshieldingdeviceforuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT ochiaiyorinari possibilityofnewshieldingdeviceforuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT odagirihiroyuki possibilityofnewshieldingdeviceforuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT hayasakajunnosuke possibilityofnewshieldingdeviceforuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT tanakamasami possibilityofnewshieldingdeviceforuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT morishimatetsuya possibilityofnewshieldingdeviceforuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT kimurakeita possibilityofnewshieldingdeviceforuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT ezawahiroshi possibilityofnewshieldingdeviceforuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT iwamotorisa possibilityofnewshieldingdeviceforuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT matsuwakiyoshinori possibilityofnewshieldingdeviceforuppergastrointestinalendoscopy
AT hoteyashu possibilityofnewshieldingdeviceforuppergastrointestinalendoscopy