Cargando…

From program suspension to the pandemic: A qualitative examination of Australia’s vaccine pharmacovigilance system over 10 years

BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Australian seasonal influenza vaccination program for children under 5 years of age was suspended due to an unexpected increase in fever and febrile convulsions causally associated with one particular influenza vaccine brand. A subsequent national review made seven recommend...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, Anastasia, Carlson, Samantha, Danchin, Margie, Beard, Frank, Macartney, Kristine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8445694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34376308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.059
_version_ 1784568704647823360
author Phillips, Anastasia
Carlson, Samantha
Danchin, Margie
Beard, Frank
Macartney, Kristine
author_facet Phillips, Anastasia
Carlson, Samantha
Danchin, Margie
Beard, Frank
Macartney, Kristine
author_sort Phillips, Anastasia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Australian seasonal influenza vaccination program for children under 5 years of age was suspended due to an unexpected increase in fever and febrile convulsions causally associated with one particular influenza vaccine brand. A subsequent national review made seven recommendations to improve vaccine pharmacovigilance. Ten years on, in advance of implementing the COVID-19 immunisation program, we evaluated views on the capacity of Australia’s vaccine pharmacovigilance system to promptly detect, examine and communicate a signal. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted between July and October 2020 with individuals with expertise in vaccine safety in Australia using an interview guide informed by key Australian and international frameworks. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to code data using a deductive approach. RESULTS: Interviews with seventeen participants enabled six themes to be identified. Participants described improvement and significant innovation within Australia’s vaccine pharmacovigilance system over the decade since 2010, particularly through establishment of a new active, cohort event monitoring system using short message service surveys. Participants thought Australia had a good foundation for COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance; implementation of the COVID-19 immunisation program was seen as a potential driver for ongoing enhancement through: a) improved integration of the active surveillance and spontaneous reporting systems, and; b) development of population-level active surveillance, including through data linkage. Transparent communication was considered essential to address the unprecedented challenges of COVID-19 and broader vaccine safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine safety experts in Australia convey confidence in the innovative pharmacovigilance systems implemented over the past 10 years. While Australia has a multifaceted system incorporating both active surveillance and spontaneous reporting systems, COVID-19 vaccine implementation represents an opportunity to enhance current systems and to develop new, systematic approaches to vaccine pharmacovigilance that should make both a local and global contribution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8445694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84456942021-09-17 From program suspension to the pandemic: A qualitative examination of Australia’s vaccine pharmacovigilance system over 10 years Phillips, Anastasia Carlson, Samantha Danchin, Margie Beard, Frank Macartney, Kristine Vaccine Article BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Australian seasonal influenza vaccination program for children under 5 years of age was suspended due to an unexpected increase in fever and febrile convulsions causally associated with one particular influenza vaccine brand. A subsequent national review made seven recommendations to improve vaccine pharmacovigilance. Ten years on, in advance of implementing the COVID-19 immunisation program, we evaluated views on the capacity of Australia’s vaccine pharmacovigilance system to promptly detect, examine and communicate a signal. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted between July and October 2020 with individuals with expertise in vaccine safety in Australia using an interview guide informed by key Australian and international frameworks. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to code data using a deductive approach. RESULTS: Interviews with seventeen participants enabled six themes to be identified. Participants described improvement and significant innovation within Australia’s vaccine pharmacovigilance system over the decade since 2010, particularly through establishment of a new active, cohort event monitoring system using short message service surveys. Participants thought Australia had a good foundation for COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance; implementation of the COVID-19 immunisation program was seen as a potential driver for ongoing enhancement through: a) improved integration of the active surveillance and spontaneous reporting systems, and; b) development of population-level active surveillance, including through data linkage. Transparent communication was considered essential to address the unprecedented challenges of COVID-19 and broader vaccine safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine safety experts in Australia convey confidence in the innovative pharmacovigilance systems implemented over the past 10 years. While Australia has a multifaceted system incorporating both active surveillance and spontaneous reporting systems, COVID-19 vaccine implementation represents an opportunity to enhance current systems and to develop new, systematic approaches to vaccine pharmacovigilance that should make both a local and global contribution. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-09-24 2021-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8445694/ /pubmed/34376308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.059 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Phillips, Anastasia
Carlson, Samantha
Danchin, Margie
Beard, Frank
Macartney, Kristine
From program suspension to the pandemic: A qualitative examination of Australia’s vaccine pharmacovigilance system over 10 years
title From program suspension to the pandemic: A qualitative examination of Australia’s vaccine pharmacovigilance system over 10 years
title_full From program suspension to the pandemic: A qualitative examination of Australia’s vaccine pharmacovigilance system over 10 years
title_fullStr From program suspension to the pandemic: A qualitative examination of Australia’s vaccine pharmacovigilance system over 10 years
title_full_unstemmed From program suspension to the pandemic: A qualitative examination of Australia’s vaccine pharmacovigilance system over 10 years
title_short From program suspension to the pandemic: A qualitative examination of Australia’s vaccine pharmacovigilance system over 10 years
title_sort from program suspension to the pandemic: a qualitative examination of australia’s vaccine pharmacovigilance system over 10 years
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8445694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34376308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.059
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipsanastasia fromprogramsuspensiontothepandemicaqualitativeexaminationofaustraliasvaccinepharmacovigilancesystemover10years
AT carlsonsamantha fromprogramsuspensiontothepandemicaqualitativeexaminationofaustraliasvaccinepharmacovigilancesystemover10years
AT danchinmargie fromprogramsuspensiontothepandemicaqualitativeexaminationofaustraliasvaccinepharmacovigilancesystemover10years
AT beardfrank fromprogramsuspensiontothepandemicaqualitativeexaminationofaustraliasvaccinepharmacovigilancesystemover10years
AT macartneykristine fromprogramsuspensiontothepandemicaqualitativeexaminationofaustraliasvaccinepharmacovigilancesystemover10years