Cargando…

Cell polarity and cell adhesion associated gene expression differences between invasive micropapillary and no special type breast carcinomas and their prognostic significance

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast (IMPC) has been in the focus of several studies given its specific histology and clinicopathological course. We analysed mRNA expression profiles and the prognostic value of 43 genes involved in cell polarity, cell-adhesion and epithelial–mesenchymal t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kramer, Zsófia, Kenessey, István, Gángó, Ambrus, Lendvai, Gábor, Kulka, Janina, Tőkés, Anna-Mária
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8446082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34531452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97347-8
_version_ 1784568801389445120
author Kramer, Zsófia
Kenessey, István
Gángó, Ambrus
Lendvai, Gábor
Kulka, Janina
Tőkés, Anna-Mária
author_facet Kramer, Zsófia
Kenessey, István
Gángó, Ambrus
Lendvai, Gábor
Kulka, Janina
Tőkés, Anna-Mária
author_sort Kramer, Zsófia
collection PubMed
description Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast (IMPC) has been in the focus of several studies given its specific histology and clinicopathological course. We analysed mRNA expression profiles and the prognostic value of 43 genes involved in cell polarity, cell-adhesion and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in IMPC tumors and compared them to invasive breast carcinomas of no special type (IBC-NST). IMPCs (36 cases), IBC-NSTs (36 cases) and mixed IMPC-IBC NSTs (8 cases) were investigated. mRNA expression level of selected genes were analysed using the NanoString nCounter Analysis System. Distant metastases free survival (DMFS) intervals were determined. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 13.5 software. Twelve genes showed significantly different expression in the IMPC group. There was no difference in DMFS according to histological type (IBC-NST vs. IMPC). High CLDN3, PALS1 and low PAR6 expression levels in the entire cohort were associated with shorter DMFS, and PALS1 was proven to be grade independent prognostic factor. Positive lymph node status was associated with higher levels of AKT1 expression. Differences in gene expression in IMPC versus IBC-NST may contribute to the unique histological appearance of IMPCs. No marked differences were observed in DMFS of the two groups. Altered gene expression in the mTOR signaling pathway in both tumor subtypes highlights the potential benefit from AKT/mTOR inhibitors in IMPCs similarly to IBC-NSTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8446082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84460822021-09-21 Cell polarity and cell adhesion associated gene expression differences between invasive micropapillary and no special type breast carcinomas and their prognostic significance Kramer, Zsófia Kenessey, István Gángó, Ambrus Lendvai, Gábor Kulka, Janina Tőkés, Anna-Mária Sci Rep Article Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast (IMPC) has been in the focus of several studies given its specific histology and clinicopathological course. We analysed mRNA expression profiles and the prognostic value of 43 genes involved in cell polarity, cell-adhesion and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in IMPC tumors and compared them to invasive breast carcinomas of no special type (IBC-NST). IMPCs (36 cases), IBC-NSTs (36 cases) and mixed IMPC-IBC NSTs (8 cases) were investigated. mRNA expression level of selected genes were analysed using the NanoString nCounter Analysis System. Distant metastases free survival (DMFS) intervals were determined. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 13.5 software. Twelve genes showed significantly different expression in the IMPC group. There was no difference in DMFS according to histological type (IBC-NST vs. IMPC). High CLDN3, PALS1 and low PAR6 expression levels in the entire cohort were associated with shorter DMFS, and PALS1 was proven to be grade independent prognostic factor. Positive lymph node status was associated with higher levels of AKT1 expression. Differences in gene expression in IMPC versus IBC-NST may contribute to the unique histological appearance of IMPCs. No marked differences were observed in DMFS of the two groups. Altered gene expression in the mTOR signaling pathway in both tumor subtypes highlights the potential benefit from AKT/mTOR inhibitors in IMPCs similarly to IBC-NSTs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8446082/ /pubmed/34531452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97347-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kramer, Zsófia
Kenessey, István
Gángó, Ambrus
Lendvai, Gábor
Kulka, Janina
Tőkés, Anna-Mária
Cell polarity and cell adhesion associated gene expression differences between invasive micropapillary and no special type breast carcinomas and their prognostic significance
title Cell polarity and cell adhesion associated gene expression differences between invasive micropapillary and no special type breast carcinomas and their prognostic significance
title_full Cell polarity and cell adhesion associated gene expression differences between invasive micropapillary and no special type breast carcinomas and their prognostic significance
title_fullStr Cell polarity and cell adhesion associated gene expression differences between invasive micropapillary and no special type breast carcinomas and their prognostic significance
title_full_unstemmed Cell polarity and cell adhesion associated gene expression differences between invasive micropapillary and no special type breast carcinomas and their prognostic significance
title_short Cell polarity and cell adhesion associated gene expression differences between invasive micropapillary and no special type breast carcinomas and their prognostic significance
title_sort cell polarity and cell adhesion associated gene expression differences between invasive micropapillary and no special type breast carcinomas and their prognostic significance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8446082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34531452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97347-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kramerzsofia cellpolarityandcelladhesionassociatedgeneexpressiondifferencesbetweeninvasivemicropapillaryandnospecialtypebreastcarcinomasandtheirprognosticsignificance
AT kenesseyistvan cellpolarityandcelladhesionassociatedgeneexpressiondifferencesbetweeninvasivemicropapillaryandnospecialtypebreastcarcinomasandtheirprognosticsignificance
AT gangoambrus cellpolarityandcelladhesionassociatedgeneexpressiondifferencesbetweeninvasivemicropapillaryandnospecialtypebreastcarcinomasandtheirprognosticsignificance
AT lendvaigabor cellpolarityandcelladhesionassociatedgeneexpressiondifferencesbetweeninvasivemicropapillaryandnospecialtypebreastcarcinomasandtheirprognosticsignificance
AT kulkajanina cellpolarityandcelladhesionassociatedgeneexpressiondifferencesbetweeninvasivemicropapillaryandnospecialtypebreastcarcinomasandtheirprognosticsignificance
AT tokesannamaria cellpolarityandcelladhesionassociatedgeneexpressiondifferencesbetweeninvasivemicropapillaryandnospecialtypebreastcarcinomasandtheirprognosticsignificance