Cargando…

Tumor immunity is related to (18)F‐FDG uptake in thymic epithelial tumor

BACKGROUND: 2‐deoxy‐2‐[fluorine‐18] fluoro‐d‐glucose ((18)F‐FDG) positron emission tomography ((18)F‐FDG‐PET) is a convenient modality to assess the metabolic activity within tumor cells. However, there is no consensus regarding the relationship between (18)F‐FDG uptake and the immune environment in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imai, Hisao, Kaira, Kyoichi, Hashimoto, Kosuke, Nitanda, Hiroyuki, Taguchi, Ryo, Yanagihara, Akitoshi, Umesaki, Tetsuya, Yamaguchi, Ou, Mouri, Atsuto, Kawasaki, Tomonori, Yasuda, Masanori, Kobayashi, Kunihiko, Sakaguchi, Hirozo, Kuji, Ichiei, Kagamu, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8446555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34363337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4176
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: 2‐deoxy‐2‐[fluorine‐18] fluoro‐d‐glucose ((18)F‐FDG) positron emission tomography ((18)F‐FDG‐PET) is a convenient modality to assess the metabolic activity within tumor cells. However, there is no consensus regarding the relationship between (18)F‐FDG uptake and the immune environment in thymic epithelial tumors (TETs). We conducted a clinicopathological study to elucidate the relationship between (18)F‐FDG uptake and programmed death ligands 1 and 2 (PD‐L1/PD‐L2) expression in patients with TETs. Methods: A total of 108 patients with histologically confirmed TETs classified as thymomas or thymic carcinomas who underwent surgical resection or biopsy or needle biopsy and (18)F‐FDG PET before any treatment between August 2007 and March 2020 were enrolled in this study. Tumor specimens underwent immunohistochemical staining for PD‐L1, PD‐L2, GLUT1, HIF‐1α, VEGFR2, VEGF‐C, and β2 adrenergic receptor. Results: High uptakes of SUV(max), SUV(mean), MTV, and TLG were identified in 28 (25.9%), 61 (56.5%), 55 (50.9%), and 55 (50.9%) of 108 patients, respectively. High uptake of SUV(max) significantly correlated with PS (performance status) of 1–2, thymic carcinoma, and advanced stage, and SUV(max) on (18)F‐FDG uptake displayed a close association with PD‐L1 and PD‐L2 expressions, but not with MTV and TLG. Our analysis revealed that SUV(max) was identified as being significant relationship for positive PD‐L1/PD‐L2 expression. GLUT1, HIF‐1α, and VEGFR2 were significantly associated with the expression of PD‐L1/PD‐L2 from the biological viewpoint. CONCLUSION: (18)F‐FDG accumulation was closely associated with the expression of PD‐L1/PD‐L2, which, in turn, was correlated with glucose metabolism and hypoxia. PD‐L1/PD‐L2 could affect the glucose metabolism and hypoxia in thymic tumor cells.