Cargando…

The aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis in primary health care: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Few studies on pharyngotonsillitis have examined the clinical presentation of different aetiologies where pathogens have been detected using molecular methods. We aimed to assess how well clinical signs and symptoms can predict (1) the presence or absence of a broad range of viruses and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pallon, Jon, Rööst, Mattias, Sundqvist, Martin, Hedin, Katarina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8446737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34535115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06665-9
_version_ 1784568950773776384
author Pallon, Jon
Rööst, Mattias
Sundqvist, Martin
Hedin, Katarina
author_facet Pallon, Jon
Rööst, Mattias
Sundqvist, Martin
Hedin, Katarina
author_sort Pallon, Jon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies on pharyngotonsillitis have examined the clinical presentation of different aetiologies where pathogens have been detected using molecular methods. We aimed to assess how well clinical signs and symptoms can predict (1) the presence or absence of a broad range of viruses and bacteria, and (2) reconsultations for a sore throat or a complication. METHODS: In this descriptive observational prospective study in primary health care 220 patients aged 15–45 with suspected pharyngotonsillitis were sampled from nose, throat and blood and screened for 20 bacteria and viruses using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), culture and serology. Odds ratios (OR) and predictive values with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to show association between microbiological findings and clinical signs and symptoms. Patients were followed up after 3 months by reviewing electronic medical records. RESULTS: Both cough and coryza were more common in patients with only viruses (67%) than in patients with only bacteria (21%) (p < 0.001), whereas tonsillar coating was more common in patients with only bacteria (53%) than in patients with only viruses (29%) (p = 0.006). Tonsillar coating (adjusted OR 6.0; 95% CI 2.5–14) and a lack of cough (adjusted OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.5–8.0) were significantly associated with Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococci; GAS) and with any bacterial finding. A Centor score of 3–4 had a positive predictive value of 49% (95% CI 42–57) for GAS and 66% (95% CI 57–74) for any bacterial findings. The use of rapid antigen detection test for GAS increased the positive predictive value for this group to 93%. CONCLUSIONS: Signs and symptoms, both single and combined, were insufficient to rule in GAS or other pathogens. However, both cough and coryza were useful to rule out GAS. The results support the clinical approach of restricting rapid antigen detection testing to patients with 3–4 Centor criteria. The low carriage rate of bacteria among asymptomatic controls implied that most detections in patients represented a true infection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06665-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8446737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84467372021-09-17 The aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis in primary health care: a prospective observational study Pallon, Jon Rööst, Mattias Sundqvist, Martin Hedin, Katarina BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Few studies on pharyngotonsillitis have examined the clinical presentation of different aetiologies where pathogens have been detected using molecular methods. We aimed to assess how well clinical signs and symptoms can predict (1) the presence or absence of a broad range of viruses and bacteria, and (2) reconsultations for a sore throat or a complication. METHODS: In this descriptive observational prospective study in primary health care 220 patients aged 15–45 with suspected pharyngotonsillitis were sampled from nose, throat and blood and screened for 20 bacteria and viruses using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), culture and serology. Odds ratios (OR) and predictive values with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to show association between microbiological findings and clinical signs and symptoms. Patients were followed up after 3 months by reviewing electronic medical records. RESULTS: Both cough and coryza were more common in patients with only viruses (67%) than in patients with only bacteria (21%) (p < 0.001), whereas tonsillar coating was more common in patients with only bacteria (53%) than in patients with only viruses (29%) (p = 0.006). Tonsillar coating (adjusted OR 6.0; 95% CI 2.5–14) and a lack of cough (adjusted OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.5–8.0) were significantly associated with Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococci; GAS) and with any bacterial finding. A Centor score of 3–4 had a positive predictive value of 49% (95% CI 42–57) for GAS and 66% (95% CI 57–74) for any bacterial findings. The use of rapid antigen detection test for GAS increased the positive predictive value for this group to 93%. CONCLUSIONS: Signs and symptoms, both single and combined, were insufficient to rule in GAS or other pathogens. However, both cough and coryza were useful to rule out GAS. The results support the clinical approach of restricting rapid antigen detection testing to patients with 3–4 Centor criteria. The low carriage rate of bacteria among asymptomatic controls implied that most detections in patients represented a true infection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06665-9. BioMed Central 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8446737/ /pubmed/34535115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06665-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pallon, Jon
Rööst, Mattias
Sundqvist, Martin
Hedin, Katarina
The aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis in primary health care: a prospective observational study
title The aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis in primary health care: a prospective observational study
title_full The aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis in primary health care: a prospective observational study
title_fullStr The aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis in primary health care: a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed The aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis in primary health care: a prospective observational study
title_short The aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis in primary health care: a prospective observational study
title_sort aetiology of pharyngotonsillitis in primary health care: a prospective observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8446737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34535115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06665-9
work_keys_str_mv AT pallonjon theaetiologyofpharyngotonsillitisinprimaryhealthcareaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT roostmattias theaetiologyofpharyngotonsillitisinprimaryhealthcareaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT sundqvistmartin theaetiologyofpharyngotonsillitisinprimaryhealthcareaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hedinkatarina theaetiologyofpharyngotonsillitisinprimaryhealthcareaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT pallonjon aetiologyofpharyngotonsillitisinprimaryhealthcareaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT roostmattias aetiologyofpharyngotonsillitisinprimaryhealthcareaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT sundqvistmartin aetiologyofpharyngotonsillitisinprimaryhealthcareaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hedinkatarina aetiologyofpharyngotonsillitisinprimaryhealthcareaprospectiveobservationalstudy