Cargando…

The impact of Covid‐19 on innovation policies promoting Open Innovation

Since the eruption of the Covid‐19 pandemic, in response to the global health emergency, governments have focused on designing policies aimed at the development of more innovative products and services. Effective collaboration, communication, and Open Innovation (OI) between government organizations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patrucco, Andrea S., Trabucchi, Daniel, Frattini, Federico, Lynch, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447132/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/radm.12495
_version_ 1784569004415778816
author Patrucco, Andrea S.
Trabucchi, Daniel
Frattini, Federico
Lynch, Jane
author_facet Patrucco, Andrea S.
Trabucchi, Daniel
Frattini, Federico
Lynch, Jane
author_sort Patrucco, Andrea S.
collection PubMed
description Since the eruption of the Covid‐19 pandemic, in response to the global health emergency, governments have focused on designing policies aimed at the development of more innovative products and services. Effective collaboration, communication, and Open Innovation (OI) between government organizations, education and research institutions, and the marketplace have been fundamental to the success of each country's response during the crisis period. Using a comprehensive data set from OECD on innovation policies implemented by governments before and during the Covid‐19 crisis, this paper analyses the extent to which these innovation policies promote OI and how these policy decisions evolve to support an effective response to the pandemic. Through a cluster analysis, we identify four possible government innovation policy strategies (centralizers; conservative OI promoters; collaborative supporters; open collaborators) and analyze how these strategies evolve before and during Covid‐19. Our findings confirm that even though there is an increased use of innovation policies promoting OI during the crisis, there is little evidence of consistency between the policy strategy used pre‐Covid and during the crisis for each country. However, there is an increased use of four types of innovation policy instruments, i.e., those entailing formal consultation with stakeholders and experts; fellowships and postgraduate loans and scholarships; networking and collaborative platforms; and dedicated support to research infrastructures. Although the paper limits the scope of the analysis to the early government reactions in selected OECD countries, it captures an important moment in time (i.e., reaction to a severe shock), which opens avenues for future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8447132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84471322021-09-17 The impact of Covid‐19 on innovation policies promoting Open Innovation Patrucco, Andrea S. Trabucchi, Daniel Frattini, Federico Lynch, Jane R&D Management Article Since the eruption of the Covid‐19 pandemic, in response to the global health emergency, governments have focused on designing policies aimed at the development of more innovative products and services. Effective collaboration, communication, and Open Innovation (OI) between government organizations, education and research institutions, and the marketplace have been fundamental to the success of each country's response during the crisis period. Using a comprehensive data set from OECD on innovation policies implemented by governments before and during the Covid‐19 crisis, this paper analyses the extent to which these innovation policies promote OI and how these policy decisions evolve to support an effective response to the pandemic. Through a cluster analysis, we identify four possible government innovation policy strategies (centralizers; conservative OI promoters; collaborative supporters; open collaborators) and analyze how these strategies evolve before and during Covid‐19. Our findings confirm that even though there is an increased use of innovation policies promoting OI during the crisis, there is little evidence of consistency between the policy strategy used pre‐Covid and during the crisis for each country. However, there is an increased use of four types of innovation policy instruments, i.e., those entailing formal consultation with stakeholders and experts; fellowships and postgraduate loans and scholarships; networking and collaborative platforms; and dedicated support to research infrastructures. Although the paper limits the scope of the analysis to the early government reactions in selected OECD countries, it captures an important moment in time (i.e., reaction to a severe shock), which opens avenues for future studies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-23 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8447132/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/radm.12495 Text en © 2021 The Authors. R&D Management published by RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Patrucco, Andrea S.
Trabucchi, Daniel
Frattini, Federico
Lynch, Jane
The impact of Covid‐19 on innovation policies promoting Open Innovation
title The impact of Covid‐19 on innovation policies promoting Open Innovation
title_full The impact of Covid‐19 on innovation policies promoting Open Innovation
title_fullStr The impact of Covid‐19 on innovation policies promoting Open Innovation
title_full_unstemmed The impact of Covid‐19 on innovation policies promoting Open Innovation
title_short The impact of Covid‐19 on innovation policies promoting Open Innovation
title_sort impact of covid‐19 on innovation policies promoting open innovation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447132/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/radm.12495
work_keys_str_mv AT patruccoandreas theimpactofcovid19oninnovationpoliciespromotingopeninnovation
AT trabucchidaniel theimpactofcovid19oninnovationpoliciespromotingopeninnovation
AT frattinifederico theimpactofcovid19oninnovationpoliciespromotingopeninnovation
AT lynchjane theimpactofcovid19oninnovationpoliciespromotingopeninnovation
AT patruccoandreas impactofcovid19oninnovationpoliciespromotingopeninnovation
AT trabucchidaniel impactofcovid19oninnovationpoliciespromotingopeninnovation
AT frattinifederico impactofcovid19oninnovationpoliciespromotingopeninnovation
AT lynchjane impactofcovid19oninnovationpoliciespromotingopeninnovation