Cargando…

Quality of complementary and alternative medicine information for type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey and quality assessment of websites

BACKGROUND: The global prevalence of diabetes mellitus is projected to reach approximately 700 million by the year 2045, with roughly 90–95% of all diabetes cases being type 2 in nature. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) frequently seek information about complementary and alternative med...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ng, Jeremy Y., Nayeni, Manav, Gilotra, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34535126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03390-3
_version_ 1784569031843381248
author Ng, Jeremy Y.
Nayeni, Manav
Gilotra, Kevin
author_facet Ng, Jeremy Y.
Nayeni, Manav
Gilotra, Kevin
author_sort Ng, Jeremy Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The global prevalence of diabetes mellitus is projected to reach approximately 700 million by the year 2045, with roughly 90–95% of all diabetes cases being type 2 in nature. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) frequently seek information about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) online. This study assessed the quality of publicly accessible websites providing consumer health information at the intersection of T2DM and CAM. METHODS: An online search engine (Google) was searched to identify pertinent websites containing information specific to CAM for T2DM patients, and the relevant websites were then screened with an eligibility criteria. Consumer health information found on eligible websites were then assessed for quality using the DISCERN instrument, a 16-item standardized scoring system. RESULTS: Across the 480 webpages identified, 94 unique webpages remained following deduplication, and 37 eligible webpages belonged to and were collapsed into 30 unique websites that were each assessed using the DISCERN instrument. The mean overall quality score (question 16) across all 30 assessed websites was 3.55 (SD = 0.86), and the mean summed DISCERN score was 52.40 (SD = 12.11). Eighty percent of websites presented a wide range of CAM treatment options with the associated benefits/risks of each treatment, but in 56.7% of the websites, the sources used to collect information were unreliable. CONCLUSION: This study identified, assessed, and presents findings on the quality of online CAM information for T2DM. Although there were several high scoring websites, there was variability across most of the individual DISCERN items in the assessed websites. This study highlights the importance of awareness among healthcare providers regarding the reliability of online information about CAM treatment and management options for T2DM. Healthcare providers should be aware of patients' information seeking behaviour, guide them in navigating through the content they encounter online, and provide them with resources containing trustworthy and reliable information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8447516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84475162021-09-17 Quality of complementary and alternative medicine information for type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey and quality assessment of websites Ng, Jeremy Y. Nayeni, Manav Gilotra, Kevin BMC Complement Med Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: The global prevalence of diabetes mellitus is projected to reach approximately 700 million by the year 2045, with roughly 90–95% of all diabetes cases being type 2 in nature. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) frequently seek information about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) online. This study assessed the quality of publicly accessible websites providing consumer health information at the intersection of T2DM and CAM. METHODS: An online search engine (Google) was searched to identify pertinent websites containing information specific to CAM for T2DM patients, and the relevant websites were then screened with an eligibility criteria. Consumer health information found on eligible websites were then assessed for quality using the DISCERN instrument, a 16-item standardized scoring system. RESULTS: Across the 480 webpages identified, 94 unique webpages remained following deduplication, and 37 eligible webpages belonged to and were collapsed into 30 unique websites that were each assessed using the DISCERN instrument. The mean overall quality score (question 16) across all 30 assessed websites was 3.55 (SD = 0.86), and the mean summed DISCERN score was 52.40 (SD = 12.11). Eighty percent of websites presented a wide range of CAM treatment options with the associated benefits/risks of each treatment, but in 56.7% of the websites, the sources used to collect information were unreliable. CONCLUSION: This study identified, assessed, and presents findings on the quality of online CAM information for T2DM. Although there were several high scoring websites, there was variability across most of the individual DISCERN items in the assessed websites. This study highlights the importance of awareness among healthcare providers regarding the reliability of online information about CAM treatment and management options for T2DM. Healthcare providers should be aware of patients' information seeking behaviour, guide them in navigating through the content they encounter online, and provide them with resources containing trustworthy and reliable information. BioMed Central 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8447516/ /pubmed/34535126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03390-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ng, Jeremy Y.
Nayeni, Manav
Gilotra, Kevin
Quality of complementary and alternative medicine information for type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey and quality assessment of websites
title Quality of complementary and alternative medicine information for type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey and quality assessment of websites
title_full Quality of complementary and alternative medicine information for type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey and quality assessment of websites
title_fullStr Quality of complementary and alternative medicine information for type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey and quality assessment of websites
title_full_unstemmed Quality of complementary and alternative medicine information for type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey and quality assessment of websites
title_short Quality of complementary and alternative medicine information for type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey and quality assessment of websites
title_sort quality of complementary and alternative medicine information for type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey and quality assessment of websites
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34535126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03390-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ngjeremyy qualityofcomplementaryandalternativemedicineinformationfortype2diabetesacrosssectionalsurveyandqualityassessmentofwebsites
AT nayenimanav qualityofcomplementaryandalternativemedicineinformationfortype2diabetesacrosssectionalsurveyandqualityassessmentofwebsites
AT gilotrakevin qualityofcomplementaryandalternativemedicineinformationfortype2diabetesacrosssectionalsurveyandqualityassessmentofwebsites