Cargando…

Considerations for prostheses choice in multiple valve surgery

OBJECTIVES: The prosthesis type for multiple valve surgery (replacement of two or more diseased native or prosthetic valves, replacement of two diseased valves with repair/reconstruction of a third, or replacement of a single diseased valve with repair/reconstruction of a second valve) remains inade...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poostizadeh, Ahmad, Jamieson, W. R. Eric, Munro, A. Ian, Miyagishima, Robert T., Ling, Hilton, Fradet, Guy J., Janusz, Michael T., Burr, Lawrence H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01631-7
_version_ 1784569053374840832
author Poostizadeh, Ahmad
Jamieson, W. R. Eric
Munro, A. Ian
Miyagishima, Robert T.
Ling, Hilton
Fradet, Guy J.
Janusz, Michael T.
Burr, Lawrence H.
author_facet Poostizadeh, Ahmad
Jamieson, W. R. Eric
Munro, A. Ian
Miyagishima, Robert T.
Ling, Hilton
Fradet, Guy J.
Janusz, Michael T.
Burr, Lawrence H.
author_sort Poostizadeh, Ahmad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The prosthesis type for multiple valve surgery (replacement of two or more diseased native or prosthetic valves, replacement of two diseased valves with repair/reconstruction of a third, or replacement of a single diseased valve with repair/reconstruction of a second valve) remains inadequately evaluated. The clinical performance of multiple valve surgery with bioprostheses (BP) and mechanical prostheses (MP) was assessed to compare patient survival and composites of valve-related complications. METHODS: Between 1975 and 2000, 1245 patients had multiple valve surgery (BP 785, mean age 62.0 ± 14.7 years; and MP 460, mean age 56.9 ± 12.9 years). There were 1712 procedures performed [BP 969(56.6%) and MP 743(43.4%). Concomitant coronary artery bypass (conCABG) was BP 206(21.3%) and MP 105(14.1%) (p = 0.0002). The cumulative follow-up was BP 5131 years and MP 3364 years. Independent predictors were determined for mortality, valve-related complications and composites of complications. RESULTS: Unadjusted patient survival at 12 years was BP 52.1 ± 2.1% and MP 54.8 ± 4.6% (p = 0.1127), while the age adjusted survival was BP 48.7 ± 2.3% and MP 54.4 ± 5.0%. The predictors of overall mortality were age [Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.051, p < 0.0001], previous valve (HR 1.366, p = 0.028) and conCABG (HR 1.27, p = 0.021). The actual freedom from valve-related mortality at 12 years was BP 85.6 ± 1.6% and MP 91.0 ± 1.6% (actuarial p = 0.0167). The predictors of valve-related mortality were valve type (BP > MP) (2.61, p = 0.001), age (HR 1.032, p = 0.0005) and previous valve (HR 12.61, p < 0.0001). The actual freedom from valve-related reoperation at 12 years was BP 60.8 ± 1.9% and MP85.6 ± 2.1% (actuarial p < 0.001). The predictors of valve-related reoperation were valve type (MP > BP) (HR 0.32, p < 0.0001), age (HR 0.99, p = 0.0001) and previous valve (HR 1.38, p = 0.008) CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival (age adjusted) is differentiated by valve type over 10 and 12 years and valve-related mortality and valve-related reoperation favours the use of mechanical prostheses, overall for multiple valve surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13019-021-01631-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8447611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84476112021-09-17 Considerations for prostheses choice in multiple valve surgery Poostizadeh, Ahmad Jamieson, W. R. Eric Munro, A. Ian Miyagishima, Robert T. Ling, Hilton Fradet, Guy J. Janusz, Michael T. Burr, Lawrence H. J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article OBJECTIVES: The prosthesis type for multiple valve surgery (replacement of two or more diseased native or prosthetic valves, replacement of two diseased valves with repair/reconstruction of a third, or replacement of a single diseased valve with repair/reconstruction of a second valve) remains inadequately evaluated. The clinical performance of multiple valve surgery with bioprostheses (BP) and mechanical prostheses (MP) was assessed to compare patient survival and composites of valve-related complications. METHODS: Between 1975 and 2000, 1245 patients had multiple valve surgery (BP 785, mean age 62.0 ± 14.7 years; and MP 460, mean age 56.9 ± 12.9 years). There were 1712 procedures performed [BP 969(56.6%) and MP 743(43.4%). Concomitant coronary artery bypass (conCABG) was BP 206(21.3%) and MP 105(14.1%) (p = 0.0002). The cumulative follow-up was BP 5131 years and MP 3364 years. Independent predictors were determined for mortality, valve-related complications and composites of complications. RESULTS: Unadjusted patient survival at 12 years was BP 52.1 ± 2.1% and MP 54.8 ± 4.6% (p = 0.1127), while the age adjusted survival was BP 48.7 ± 2.3% and MP 54.4 ± 5.0%. The predictors of overall mortality were age [Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.051, p < 0.0001], previous valve (HR 1.366, p = 0.028) and conCABG (HR 1.27, p = 0.021). The actual freedom from valve-related mortality at 12 years was BP 85.6 ± 1.6% and MP 91.0 ± 1.6% (actuarial p = 0.0167). The predictors of valve-related mortality were valve type (BP > MP) (2.61, p = 0.001), age (HR 1.032, p = 0.0005) and previous valve (HR 12.61, p < 0.0001). The actual freedom from valve-related reoperation at 12 years was BP 60.8 ± 1.9% and MP85.6 ± 2.1% (actuarial p < 0.001). The predictors of valve-related reoperation were valve type (MP > BP) (HR 0.32, p < 0.0001), age (HR 0.99, p = 0.0001) and previous valve (HR 1.38, p = 0.008) CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival (age adjusted) is differentiated by valve type over 10 and 12 years and valve-related mortality and valve-related reoperation favours the use of mechanical prostheses, overall for multiple valve surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13019-021-01631-7. BioMed Central 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8447611/ /pubmed/34530898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01631-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Poostizadeh, Ahmad
Jamieson, W. R. Eric
Munro, A. Ian
Miyagishima, Robert T.
Ling, Hilton
Fradet, Guy J.
Janusz, Michael T.
Burr, Lawrence H.
Considerations for prostheses choice in multiple valve surgery
title Considerations for prostheses choice in multiple valve surgery
title_full Considerations for prostheses choice in multiple valve surgery
title_fullStr Considerations for prostheses choice in multiple valve surgery
title_full_unstemmed Considerations for prostheses choice in multiple valve surgery
title_short Considerations for prostheses choice in multiple valve surgery
title_sort considerations for prostheses choice in multiple valve surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01631-7
work_keys_str_mv AT poostizadehahmad considerationsforprostheseschoiceinmultiplevalvesurgery
AT jamiesonwreric considerationsforprostheseschoiceinmultiplevalvesurgery
AT munroaian considerationsforprostheseschoiceinmultiplevalvesurgery
AT miyagishimarobertt considerationsforprostheseschoiceinmultiplevalvesurgery
AT linghilton considerationsforprostheseschoiceinmultiplevalvesurgery
AT fradetguyj considerationsforprostheseschoiceinmultiplevalvesurgery
AT januszmichaelt considerationsforprostheseschoiceinmultiplevalvesurgery
AT burrlawrenceh considerationsforprostheseschoiceinmultiplevalvesurgery