Cargando…

Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: There are various skin suture techniques for wound closure following carpal tunnel release, and well-performed suturing will result in low post-operative scar tenderness. The aim of this study was to compare the Donati suture technique and running subcuticular technique in terms of surgi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suwannaphisit, Sitthiphong, Aonsong, Wachirakorn, Suwanno, Porames, Yuenyongviwat, Varah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34535166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02710-0
_version_ 1784569073644863488
author Suwannaphisit, Sitthiphong
Aonsong, Wachirakorn
Suwanno, Porames
Yuenyongviwat, Varah
author_facet Suwannaphisit, Sitthiphong
Aonsong, Wachirakorn
Suwanno, Porames
Yuenyongviwat, Varah
author_sort Suwannaphisit, Sitthiphong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are various skin suture techniques for wound closure following carpal tunnel release, and well-performed suturing will result in low post-operative scar tenderness. The aim of this study was to compare the Donati suture technique and running subcuticular technique in terms of surgical scar, post-operative pain and functional outcome in open carpal tunnel release. METHODS: One-hundred forty-two patients were randomized using a computer-generated random number table into two groups receiving either running subcuticular suturing or Donati suturing after surgical intervention. We evaluated postoperative scarring using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), pain intensity using a verbal numerical rating scale, and functional outcomes using the Thai version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire after surgical decompression for carpal tunnel syndrome at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Continuous data are reported as mean ± SD while normally distributed or as median (interquartile range) when the distribution was skewed. RESULTS: Lower scores at 2 weeks were given by the patients receiving the running subcuticular suture technique than the Donati suture technique (15.3 ± 4.8 vs 17 ± 4.6, respectively, P < 0.05) while the observer scores were not significantly different (15.6 ± 5.8 vs 16.7 ± 5.2, respectively, P = 0.15). At both 6 and 12 weeks post-surgical decompression both patient and observer scores were not significantly different. There were no differences between the groups in terms of VNRS pain scores and functional Boston Carpal Tunnel Scores at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial found that although scarring assessments were slightly better in the earliest period following wound closure after surgical decompression in carpal tunnel syndrome using the running subcuticular suture, the final results at 3 months postoperative were not significantly different. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/ (TCTR20191204002).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8447700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84477002021-09-20 Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial Suwannaphisit, Sitthiphong Aonsong, Wachirakorn Suwanno, Porames Yuenyongviwat, Varah J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: There are various skin suture techniques for wound closure following carpal tunnel release, and well-performed suturing will result in low post-operative scar tenderness. The aim of this study was to compare the Donati suture technique and running subcuticular technique in terms of surgical scar, post-operative pain and functional outcome in open carpal tunnel release. METHODS: One-hundred forty-two patients were randomized using a computer-generated random number table into two groups receiving either running subcuticular suturing or Donati suturing after surgical intervention. We evaluated postoperative scarring using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), pain intensity using a verbal numerical rating scale, and functional outcomes using the Thai version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire after surgical decompression for carpal tunnel syndrome at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Continuous data are reported as mean ± SD while normally distributed or as median (interquartile range) when the distribution was skewed. RESULTS: Lower scores at 2 weeks were given by the patients receiving the running subcuticular suture technique than the Donati suture technique (15.3 ± 4.8 vs 17 ± 4.6, respectively, P < 0.05) while the observer scores were not significantly different (15.6 ± 5.8 vs 16.7 ± 5.2, respectively, P = 0.15). At both 6 and 12 weeks post-surgical decompression both patient and observer scores were not significantly different. There were no differences between the groups in terms of VNRS pain scores and functional Boston Carpal Tunnel Scores at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial found that although scarring assessments were slightly better in the earliest period following wound closure after surgical decompression in carpal tunnel syndrome using the running subcuticular suture, the final results at 3 months postoperative were not significantly different. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/ (TCTR20191204002). BioMed Central 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8447700/ /pubmed/34535166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02710-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Suwannaphisit, Sitthiphong
Aonsong, Wachirakorn
Suwanno, Porames
Yuenyongviwat, Varah
Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial
title Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34535166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02710-0
work_keys_str_mv AT suwannaphisitsitthiphong comparingtherunningsubcuticulartechniqueversusthedonatitechniqueinopencarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aonsongwachirakorn comparingtherunningsubcuticulartechniqueversusthedonatitechniqueinopencarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT suwannoporames comparingtherunningsubcuticulartechniqueversusthedonatitechniqueinopencarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yuenyongviwatvarah comparingtherunningsubcuticulartechniqueversusthedonatitechniqueinopencarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial