Cargando…
Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: There are various skin suture techniques for wound closure following carpal tunnel release, and well-performed suturing will result in low post-operative scar tenderness. The aim of this study was to compare the Donati suture technique and running subcuticular technique in terms of surgi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34535166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02710-0 |
_version_ | 1784569073644863488 |
---|---|
author | Suwannaphisit, Sitthiphong Aonsong, Wachirakorn Suwanno, Porames Yuenyongviwat, Varah |
author_facet | Suwannaphisit, Sitthiphong Aonsong, Wachirakorn Suwanno, Porames Yuenyongviwat, Varah |
author_sort | Suwannaphisit, Sitthiphong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are various skin suture techniques for wound closure following carpal tunnel release, and well-performed suturing will result in low post-operative scar tenderness. The aim of this study was to compare the Donati suture technique and running subcuticular technique in terms of surgical scar, post-operative pain and functional outcome in open carpal tunnel release. METHODS: One-hundred forty-two patients were randomized using a computer-generated random number table into two groups receiving either running subcuticular suturing or Donati suturing after surgical intervention. We evaluated postoperative scarring using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), pain intensity using a verbal numerical rating scale, and functional outcomes using the Thai version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire after surgical decompression for carpal tunnel syndrome at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Continuous data are reported as mean ± SD while normally distributed or as median (interquartile range) when the distribution was skewed. RESULTS: Lower scores at 2 weeks were given by the patients receiving the running subcuticular suture technique than the Donati suture technique (15.3 ± 4.8 vs 17 ± 4.6, respectively, P < 0.05) while the observer scores were not significantly different (15.6 ± 5.8 vs 16.7 ± 5.2, respectively, P = 0.15). At both 6 and 12 weeks post-surgical decompression both patient and observer scores were not significantly different. There were no differences between the groups in terms of VNRS pain scores and functional Boston Carpal Tunnel Scores at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial found that although scarring assessments were slightly better in the earliest period following wound closure after surgical decompression in carpal tunnel syndrome using the running subcuticular suture, the final results at 3 months postoperative were not significantly different. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/ (TCTR20191204002). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8447700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84477002021-09-20 Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial Suwannaphisit, Sitthiphong Aonsong, Wachirakorn Suwanno, Porames Yuenyongviwat, Varah J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: There are various skin suture techniques for wound closure following carpal tunnel release, and well-performed suturing will result in low post-operative scar tenderness. The aim of this study was to compare the Donati suture technique and running subcuticular technique in terms of surgical scar, post-operative pain and functional outcome in open carpal tunnel release. METHODS: One-hundred forty-two patients were randomized using a computer-generated random number table into two groups receiving either running subcuticular suturing or Donati suturing after surgical intervention. We evaluated postoperative scarring using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), pain intensity using a verbal numerical rating scale, and functional outcomes using the Thai version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire after surgical decompression for carpal tunnel syndrome at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Continuous data are reported as mean ± SD while normally distributed or as median (interquartile range) when the distribution was skewed. RESULTS: Lower scores at 2 weeks were given by the patients receiving the running subcuticular suture technique than the Donati suture technique (15.3 ± 4.8 vs 17 ± 4.6, respectively, P < 0.05) while the observer scores were not significantly different (15.6 ± 5.8 vs 16.7 ± 5.2, respectively, P = 0.15). At both 6 and 12 weeks post-surgical decompression both patient and observer scores were not significantly different. There were no differences between the groups in terms of VNRS pain scores and functional Boston Carpal Tunnel Scores at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial found that although scarring assessments were slightly better in the earliest period following wound closure after surgical decompression in carpal tunnel syndrome using the running subcuticular suture, the final results at 3 months postoperative were not significantly different. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/ (TCTR20191204002). BioMed Central 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8447700/ /pubmed/34535166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02710-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Suwannaphisit, Sitthiphong Aonsong, Wachirakorn Suwanno, Porames Yuenyongviwat, Varah Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34535166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02710-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suwannaphisitsitthiphong comparingtherunningsubcuticulartechniqueversusthedonatitechniqueinopencarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT aonsongwachirakorn comparingtherunningsubcuticulartechniqueversusthedonatitechniqueinopencarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT suwannoporames comparingtherunningsubcuticulartechniqueversusthedonatitechniqueinopencarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yuenyongviwatvarah comparingtherunningsubcuticulartechniqueversusthedonatitechniqueinopencarpaltunnelreleasearandomizedcontrolledtrial |