Cargando…

Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Frailty Index and Frailty Phenotype in older hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest for interventions aiming at preventing frailty progression or even to reverse frailty in older people, yet it is still unclear which frailty instrument is most appropriate for measuring change scores over time to determine the effectiveness of interventions. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feenstra, Marlies, Oud, Frederike M.M., Jansen, Carolien J., Smidt, Nynke, van Munster, Barbara C., de Rooij, Sophia E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34535074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02444-y
_version_ 1784569086469996544
author Feenstra, Marlies
Oud, Frederike M.M.
Jansen, Carolien J.
Smidt, Nynke
van Munster, Barbara C.
de Rooij, Sophia E.
author_facet Feenstra, Marlies
Oud, Frederike M.M.
Jansen, Carolien J.
Smidt, Nynke
van Munster, Barbara C.
de Rooij, Sophia E.
author_sort Feenstra, Marlies
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is growing interest for interventions aiming at preventing frailty progression or even to reverse frailty in older people, yet it is still unclear which frailty instrument is most appropriate for measuring change scores over time to determine the effectiveness of interventions. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine reproducibility and responsiveness properties of the Frailty Index (FI) and Frailty Phenotype (FP) in acutely hospitalized medical patients aged 70 years and older. METHODS: Reproducibility was assessed by Intra-Class Correlation Coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC); Responsiveness was assessed by the standardized response mean (SRM), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: At baseline, 243 patients were included with a median age of 76 years (range 70–98). The analytic samples included 192 and 187 patients in the three and twelve months follow-up analyses, respectively. ICC of the FI were 0.85 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.76; 0.91) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77; 0.90), and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.49; 0.77) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65; 0.84) for the FP. SEM ranged from 5 to 13 %; SDC from 13 to 37 %. SRMs were good in patients with unchanged frailty status (< 0.50), and doubtful to good for deteriorated and improved patients (0.43–1.00). AUC’s over three months were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69; 0.86) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.62; 0.79) for the FI, and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.58; 0.77) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.55; 0.74) for the FP. Over twelve months, AUCs were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69; 0.87) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73; 0.90) for the FI, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69; 0.87) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67; 0.84) for the FP. CONCLUSIONS: The Frailty Index showed better reproducibility and responsiveness properties compared to the Frailty Phenotype among acutely hospitalized older patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02444-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8447764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84477642021-09-20 Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Frailty Index and Frailty Phenotype in older hospitalized patients Feenstra, Marlies Oud, Frederike M.M. Jansen, Carolien J. Smidt, Nynke van Munster, Barbara C. de Rooij, Sophia E. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: There is growing interest for interventions aiming at preventing frailty progression or even to reverse frailty in older people, yet it is still unclear which frailty instrument is most appropriate for measuring change scores over time to determine the effectiveness of interventions. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine reproducibility and responsiveness properties of the Frailty Index (FI) and Frailty Phenotype (FP) in acutely hospitalized medical patients aged 70 years and older. METHODS: Reproducibility was assessed by Intra-Class Correlation Coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC); Responsiveness was assessed by the standardized response mean (SRM), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: At baseline, 243 patients were included with a median age of 76 years (range 70–98). The analytic samples included 192 and 187 patients in the three and twelve months follow-up analyses, respectively. ICC of the FI were 0.85 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.76; 0.91) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77; 0.90), and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.49; 0.77) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65; 0.84) for the FP. SEM ranged from 5 to 13 %; SDC from 13 to 37 %. SRMs were good in patients with unchanged frailty status (< 0.50), and doubtful to good for deteriorated and improved patients (0.43–1.00). AUC’s over three months were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69; 0.86) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.62; 0.79) for the FI, and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.58; 0.77) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.55; 0.74) for the FP. Over twelve months, AUCs were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69; 0.87) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73; 0.90) for the FI, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69; 0.87) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67; 0.84) for the FP. CONCLUSIONS: The Frailty Index showed better reproducibility and responsiveness properties compared to the Frailty Phenotype among acutely hospitalized older patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02444-y. BioMed Central 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8447764/ /pubmed/34535074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02444-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Feenstra, Marlies
Oud, Frederike M.M.
Jansen, Carolien J.
Smidt, Nynke
van Munster, Barbara C.
de Rooij, Sophia E.
Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Frailty Index and Frailty Phenotype in older hospitalized patients
title Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Frailty Index and Frailty Phenotype in older hospitalized patients
title_full Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Frailty Index and Frailty Phenotype in older hospitalized patients
title_fullStr Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Frailty Index and Frailty Phenotype in older hospitalized patients
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Frailty Index and Frailty Phenotype in older hospitalized patients
title_short Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Frailty Index and Frailty Phenotype in older hospitalized patients
title_sort reproducibility and responsiveness of the frailty index and frailty phenotype in older hospitalized patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34535074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02444-y
work_keys_str_mv AT feenstramarlies reproducibilityandresponsivenessofthefrailtyindexandfrailtyphenotypeinolderhospitalizedpatients
AT oudfrederikemm reproducibilityandresponsivenessofthefrailtyindexandfrailtyphenotypeinolderhospitalizedpatients
AT jansencarolienj reproducibilityandresponsivenessofthefrailtyindexandfrailtyphenotypeinolderhospitalizedpatients
AT smidtnynke reproducibilityandresponsivenessofthefrailtyindexandfrailtyphenotypeinolderhospitalizedpatients
AT vanmunsterbarbarac reproducibilityandresponsivenessofthefrailtyindexandfrailtyphenotypeinolderhospitalizedpatients
AT derooijsophiae reproducibilityandresponsivenessofthefrailtyindexandfrailtyphenotypeinolderhospitalizedpatients