Cargando…

Heterogeneity in major depression and its melancholic and atypical specifiers: a secondary analysis of STAR*D

OBJECTIVES: The melancholic and atypical specifiers for a major depressive episode (MDE) are supposed to reduce heterogeneity in symptom presentation by requiring additional, specific features. Fried et al. (2020) recently showed that the melancholic specifier may increase the potential heterogeneit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo, Buss, John F., Fried, Eiko I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03444-3
_version_ 1784569099611799552
author Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo
Buss, John F.
Fried, Eiko I.
author_facet Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo
Buss, John F.
Fried, Eiko I.
author_sort Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The melancholic and atypical specifiers for a major depressive episode (MDE) are supposed to reduce heterogeneity in symptom presentation by requiring additional, specific features. Fried et al. (2020) recently showed that the melancholic specifier may increase the potential heterogeneity in presenting symptoms. In a large sample of outpatients with depression, our objective was to explore whether the melancholic and atypical specifiers reduced observed heterogeneity in symptoms. METHODS: We used baseline data from the Inventory of Depression Symptoms (IDS), which was available for 3,717 patients, from the Sequenced Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial. A subsample met criteria for MDE on the IDS (“IDS-MDE”; N =2,496). For patients with IDS-MDE, we differentiated between those with melancholic, non-melancholic, non-melancholic, atypical, and non-atypical depression. We quantified the observed heterogeneity between groups by counting the number of unique symptom combinations pertaining to their given diagnostic group (e.g., counting the melancholic symptoms for melancholic and non-melancholic groups), as well as the profiles of DSM-MDE symptoms (i.e., ignoring the specifier symptoms). RESULTS: When considering the specifier and depressive symptoms, there was more observed heterogeneity within the melancholic and atypical subgroups than in the IDS-MDE sample (i.e., ignoring the specifier subgroups). The differences in number of profiles between the melancholic and non-melancholic groups were not statistically significant, irrespective of whether focusing on the specifier symptoms or only the DSM-MDE symptoms. The differences between the atypical and non-atypical subgroups were smaller than what would be expected by chance. We found no evidence that the specifier groups reduce heterogeneity, as can be quantified by unique symptom profiles. Most symptom profiles, even in the specifier subgroups, had five or fewer individuals. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that the atypical and melancholic specifiers create more symptomatically homogeneous groups. Indeed, the melancholic and atypical specifiers introduce heterogeneity by adding symptoms to the DSM diagnosis of MDE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8447832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84478322021-09-20 Heterogeneity in major depression and its melancholic and atypical specifiers: a secondary analysis of STAR*D Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo Buss, John F. Fried, Eiko I. BMC Psychiatry Research OBJECTIVES: The melancholic and atypical specifiers for a major depressive episode (MDE) are supposed to reduce heterogeneity in symptom presentation by requiring additional, specific features. Fried et al. (2020) recently showed that the melancholic specifier may increase the potential heterogeneity in presenting symptoms. In a large sample of outpatients with depression, our objective was to explore whether the melancholic and atypical specifiers reduced observed heterogeneity in symptoms. METHODS: We used baseline data from the Inventory of Depression Symptoms (IDS), which was available for 3,717 patients, from the Sequenced Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial. A subsample met criteria for MDE on the IDS (“IDS-MDE”; N =2,496). For patients with IDS-MDE, we differentiated between those with melancholic, non-melancholic, non-melancholic, atypical, and non-atypical depression. We quantified the observed heterogeneity between groups by counting the number of unique symptom combinations pertaining to their given diagnostic group (e.g., counting the melancholic symptoms for melancholic and non-melancholic groups), as well as the profiles of DSM-MDE symptoms (i.e., ignoring the specifier symptoms). RESULTS: When considering the specifier and depressive symptoms, there was more observed heterogeneity within the melancholic and atypical subgroups than in the IDS-MDE sample (i.e., ignoring the specifier subgroups). The differences in number of profiles between the melancholic and non-melancholic groups were not statistically significant, irrespective of whether focusing on the specifier symptoms or only the DSM-MDE symptoms. The differences between the atypical and non-atypical subgroups were smaller than what would be expected by chance. We found no evidence that the specifier groups reduce heterogeneity, as can be quantified by unique symptom profiles. Most symptom profiles, even in the specifier subgroups, had five or fewer individuals. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that the atypical and melancholic specifiers create more symptomatically homogeneous groups. Indeed, the melancholic and atypical specifiers introduce heterogeneity by adding symptoms to the DSM diagnosis of MDE. BioMed Central 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8447832/ /pubmed/34530785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03444-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo
Buss, John F.
Fried, Eiko I.
Heterogeneity in major depression and its melancholic and atypical specifiers: a secondary analysis of STAR*D
title Heterogeneity in major depression and its melancholic and atypical specifiers: a secondary analysis of STAR*D
title_full Heterogeneity in major depression and its melancholic and atypical specifiers: a secondary analysis of STAR*D
title_fullStr Heterogeneity in major depression and its melancholic and atypical specifiers: a secondary analysis of STAR*D
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity in major depression and its melancholic and atypical specifiers: a secondary analysis of STAR*D
title_short Heterogeneity in major depression and its melancholic and atypical specifiers: a secondary analysis of STAR*D
title_sort heterogeneity in major depression and its melancholic and atypical specifiers: a secondary analysis of star*d
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03444-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzoluaceslorenzo heterogeneityinmajordepressionanditsmelancholicandatypicalspecifiersasecondaryanalysisofstard
AT bussjohnf heterogeneityinmajordepressionanditsmelancholicandatypicalspecifiersasecondaryanalysisofstard
AT friedeikoi heterogeneityinmajordepressionanditsmelancholicandatypicalspecifiersasecondaryanalysisofstard