Cargando…

Prioritizing vaccination by age and social activity to advance societal health benefits in Norway: a modelling study

BACKGROUND: Vaccination has the proven effectiveness in reducing disease burden. As the emergency program is moving towards completion in many countries, there is a new urgency to appropriately assess the societal health benefits in both the near and longer term. METHODS: Using an age-structured mat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ruiyun, Bjørnstad, Ottar N., Stenseth, Nils Chr.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8448383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100200
_version_ 1784569229938262016
author Li, Ruiyun
Bjørnstad, Ottar N.
Stenseth, Nils Chr.
author_facet Li, Ruiyun
Bjørnstad, Ottar N.
Stenseth, Nils Chr.
author_sort Li, Ruiyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vaccination has the proven effectiveness in reducing disease burden. As the emergency program is moving towards completion in many countries, there is a new urgency to appropriately assess the societal health benefits in both the near and longer term. METHODS: Using an age-structured mathematical infection model, we evaluate the gains achievable by adopting the ongoing and the possible alternative vaccination strategies to reduce COVID-19 infections in the current pandemic as well as during the future successive waves in Norway. We explicitly consider three allocation strategies, with single focus group on either (i) the older age groups at high risk of dying or (ii) the core-sociable groups at high risk of exposure and onwards transmission, versus strategies focusing on both groups by (iii) switching among the high-risk to the core-sociable. FINDINGS: Following the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (FHI) schedule, we estimate that allocating vaccines in an age-descending order may reduce around one-third of the infections; while strategy considering age-specific sociability may contribute to an additional ∼10% fewer infections. INTERPRETATION: A key insight of our study is that prioritizing the high-risk and core-sociable groups may maximize the benefit due to both direct and indirect protections, and thus achieving the larger societal health benefits. Our analyses provides a quantitative tool to planning of future campaigns for Scandinavian and other countries with comparable infection-fatality ratios, demographies and public health infrastructure. FUNDING: Research Council of Norway and the Penn State University.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8448383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84483832021-09-20 Prioritizing vaccination by age and social activity to advance societal health benefits in Norway: a modelling study Li, Ruiyun Bjørnstad, Ottar N. Stenseth, Nils Chr. Lancet Reg Health Eur Research Paper BACKGROUND: Vaccination has the proven effectiveness in reducing disease burden. As the emergency program is moving towards completion in many countries, there is a new urgency to appropriately assess the societal health benefits in both the near and longer term. METHODS: Using an age-structured mathematical infection model, we evaluate the gains achievable by adopting the ongoing and the possible alternative vaccination strategies to reduce COVID-19 infections in the current pandemic as well as during the future successive waves in Norway. We explicitly consider three allocation strategies, with single focus group on either (i) the older age groups at high risk of dying or (ii) the core-sociable groups at high risk of exposure and onwards transmission, versus strategies focusing on both groups by (iii) switching among the high-risk to the core-sociable. FINDINGS: Following the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (FHI) schedule, we estimate that allocating vaccines in an age-descending order may reduce around one-third of the infections; while strategy considering age-specific sociability may contribute to an additional ∼10% fewer infections. INTERPRETATION: A key insight of our study is that prioritizing the high-risk and core-sociable groups may maximize the benefit due to both direct and indirect protections, and thus achieving the larger societal health benefits. Our analyses provides a quantitative tool to planning of future campaigns for Scandinavian and other countries with comparable infection-fatality ratios, demographies and public health infrastructure. FUNDING: Research Council of Norway and the Penn State University. Elsevier 2021-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8448383/ /pubmed/34568858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100200 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Li, Ruiyun
Bjørnstad, Ottar N.
Stenseth, Nils Chr.
Prioritizing vaccination by age and social activity to advance societal health benefits in Norway: a modelling study
title Prioritizing vaccination by age and social activity to advance societal health benefits in Norway: a modelling study
title_full Prioritizing vaccination by age and social activity to advance societal health benefits in Norway: a modelling study
title_fullStr Prioritizing vaccination by age and social activity to advance societal health benefits in Norway: a modelling study
title_full_unstemmed Prioritizing vaccination by age and social activity to advance societal health benefits in Norway: a modelling study
title_short Prioritizing vaccination by age and social activity to advance societal health benefits in Norway: a modelling study
title_sort prioritizing vaccination by age and social activity to advance societal health benefits in norway: a modelling study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8448383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100200
work_keys_str_mv AT liruiyun prioritizingvaccinationbyageandsocialactivitytoadvancesocietalhealthbenefitsinnorwayamodellingstudy
AT bjørnstadottarn prioritizingvaccinationbyageandsocialactivitytoadvancesocietalhealthbenefitsinnorwayamodellingstudy
AT stensethnilschr prioritizingvaccinationbyageandsocialactivitytoadvancesocietalhealthbenefitsinnorwayamodellingstudy