Cargando…

Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Predictors of True Therapeutic Inertia on Patients with Hypertension in a Primary Care Clinic in Thailand

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension (HT) has a significant impact on health care worldwide. Therapeutic inertia (TI) is defined as the failure to intensify therapy in the absence of an optimal goal and is widely used as a quality of care parameter. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affecte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sornsenee, Phoomjai, Vichitkunakorn, Polathep, Choomalee, Kittisakdi, Romyasamit, Chonticha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8448536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34548829
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S327644
_version_ 1784569257796829184
author Sornsenee, Phoomjai
Vichitkunakorn, Polathep
Choomalee, Kittisakdi
Romyasamit, Chonticha
author_facet Sornsenee, Phoomjai
Vichitkunakorn, Polathep
Choomalee, Kittisakdi
Romyasamit, Chonticha
author_sort Sornsenee, Phoomjai
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Hypertension (HT) has a significant impact on health care worldwide. Therapeutic inertia (TI) is defined as the failure to intensify therapy in the absence of an optimal goal and is widely used as a quality of care parameter. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected many health-care systems, including HT care. Therefore, the present study assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on TI and its predictors in patients with HT. METHODS: The electronic medical records of patients with HT who attended a primary care clinic at a tertiary hospital during pre-COVID-19 (February 2019 to February 2020) and COVID-19 (March to August 2020) periods were reviewed. RESULTS: Our study included 6089 visits during the 12-month pre-COVID-19 period and 2852 visits during the 6-month COVID-19 period. Most of the baseline characteristics of the HT patients were not significantly different between the two time periods. During the COVID-19 period, the percentage of uncontrolled HT visits decreased from 43% to 31%. Similarly, the prevalence of TI decreased from 81% to 77%. False TI was predominantly due to physicians’ concerns regarding the in-clinic blood pressure measurement being inaccurate during both the periods. CONCLUSION: After readjustment for the physicians ‘reasons, the true TI was 64% and 60% in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 period. For adjusted physician and patient-related factors, multilevel modeling was used. Senior medical staff visits, elderly patients, prior diabetes mellitus diagnosis, patients who used more than one type of anti-HT medication, and patients with systolic blood pressure >150 mmHg were all predictors of TI. The COVID-19 period, on the other hand had no effect on TI with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.67–1.01).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8448536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84485362021-09-20 Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Predictors of True Therapeutic Inertia on Patients with Hypertension in a Primary Care Clinic in Thailand Sornsenee, Phoomjai Vichitkunakorn, Polathep Choomalee, Kittisakdi Romyasamit, Chonticha Risk Manag Healthc Policy Original Research INTRODUCTION: Hypertension (HT) has a significant impact on health care worldwide. Therapeutic inertia (TI) is defined as the failure to intensify therapy in the absence of an optimal goal and is widely used as a quality of care parameter. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected many health-care systems, including HT care. Therefore, the present study assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on TI and its predictors in patients with HT. METHODS: The electronic medical records of patients with HT who attended a primary care clinic at a tertiary hospital during pre-COVID-19 (February 2019 to February 2020) and COVID-19 (March to August 2020) periods were reviewed. RESULTS: Our study included 6089 visits during the 12-month pre-COVID-19 period and 2852 visits during the 6-month COVID-19 period. Most of the baseline characteristics of the HT patients were not significantly different between the two time periods. During the COVID-19 period, the percentage of uncontrolled HT visits decreased from 43% to 31%. Similarly, the prevalence of TI decreased from 81% to 77%. False TI was predominantly due to physicians’ concerns regarding the in-clinic blood pressure measurement being inaccurate during both the periods. CONCLUSION: After readjustment for the physicians ‘reasons, the true TI was 64% and 60% in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 period. For adjusted physician and patient-related factors, multilevel modeling was used. Senior medical staff visits, elderly patients, prior diabetes mellitus diagnosis, patients who used more than one type of anti-HT medication, and patients with systolic blood pressure >150 mmHg were all predictors of TI. The COVID-19 period, on the other hand had no effect on TI with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.67–1.01). Dove 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8448536/ /pubmed/34548829 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S327644 Text en © 2021 Sornsenee et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Sornsenee, Phoomjai
Vichitkunakorn, Polathep
Choomalee, Kittisakdi
Romyasamit, Chonticha
Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Predictors of True Therapeutic Inertia on Patients with Hypertension in a Primary Care Clinic in Thailand
title Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Predictors of True Therapeutic Inertia on Patients with Hypertension in a Primary Care Clinic in Thailand
title_full Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Predictors of True Therapeutic Inertia on Patients with Hypertension in a Primary Care Clinic in Thailand
title_fullStr Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Predictors of True Therapeutic Inertia on Patients with Hypertension in a Primary Care Clinic in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Predictors of True Therapeutic Inertia on Patients with Hypertension in a Primary Care Clinic in Thailand
title_short Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Predictors of True Therapeutic Inertia on Patients with Hypertension in a Primary Care Clinic in Thailand
title_sort effect of the covid-19 pandemic and other predictors of true therapeutic inertia on patients with hypertension in a primary care clinic in thailand
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8448536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34548829
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S327644
work_keys_str_mv AT sornseneephoomjai effectofthecovid19pandemicandotherpredictorsoftruetherapeuticinertiaonpatientswithhypertensioninaprimarycareclinicinthailand
AT vichitkunakornpolathep effectofthecovid19pandemicandotherpredictorsoftruetherapeuticinertiaonpatientswithhypertensioninaprimarycareclinicinthailand
AT choomaleekittisakdi effectofthecovid19pandemicandotherpredictorsoftruetherapeuticinertiaonpatientswithhypertensioninaprimarycareclinicinthailand
AT romyasamitchonticha effectofthecovid19pandemicandotherpredictorsoftruetherapeuticinertiaonpatientswithhypertensioninaprimarycareclinicinthailand