Cargando…

Comparison of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Ranibizumab in Vitrectomized Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) for pseudophakic vitrectomized eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) in a single institution. METHODS: Pseudophakic vitrectomized eyes with treatment-naïve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jia-Kang, Huang, Tzu-Lun, Chang, Pei-Yao, Ho, Wei-Ting, Hsu, Yung-Ray, Chen, Fang-Ting, Chen, Yun-Ju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8448602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8882539
_version_ 1784569267766689792
author Wang, Jia-Kang
Huang, Tzu-Lun
Chang, Pei-Yao
Ho, Wei-Ting
Hsu, Yung-Ray
Chen, Fang-Ting
Chen, Yun-Ju
author_facet Wang, Jia-Kang
Huang, Tzu-Lun
Chang, Pei-Yao
Ho, Wei-Ting
Hsu, Yung-Ray
Chen, Fang-Ting
Chen, Yun-Ju
author_sort Wang, Jia-Kang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) for pseudophakic vitrectomized eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) in a single institution. METHODS: Pseudophakic vitrectomized eyes with treatment-naïve center-involved DME were enrolled, with one eye in each patient. They were divided into two groups: one group receiving IDI every 3 to 4 months and another group receiving IVR using 3 monthly plus treat-and-extend injections, all with monthly follow-up for 6 months. Switch of intravitreal drugs or deferred macular laser was not allowed. Primary outcome measures included change in central foveal thickness (CFT) in 1 mm by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at Month 6. RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes were included in the IDI group and 26 eyes in the IVR group. The baseline demographics, glycosylated hemoglobin level, intraocular pressure (IOP), BCVA, and CFT did not significantly differ (p > 0.05). Compared to baseline data, CFT decreased and BCVA improved significantly after either IDI or IVR at Month 6 (p < 0.05). Significantly better mean final BCVA (0.38 logMAR vs. 0.62 logMAR, p=0.04), more mean visual gain (−0.30 logMAR vs. −0.15 logMAR, p=0.02), lower mean final CFT (310.9 μm vs. 384.2 μm, p=0.04), and larger mean CFT decrease (−150.0 μm vs. −60.1 μm, p=0.03) were found in the IDI group compared to those in the IVR group. A smaller mean treatment number (2.6 vs. 5.6, p < 0.001) and higher rate of postinjection ocular hypertension requiring topical hypotensive agent therapy (27.3% vs. 0%, p=0.0002) were demonstrated in the IDI group than those in the IVR group. CONCLUSION: We concluded that IDI and IVR can both effectively treat vitrectomized eyes with DME. Dexamethasone implants had significantly better visual/anatomical improvement, smaller treatment number, and higher rate of elevated IOP after injection than IVR in pseudophakic vitrectomized eyes with DME in a 6-month period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8448602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84486022021-09-18 Comparison of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Ranibizumab in Vitrectomized Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema Wang, Jia-Kang Huang, Tzu-Lun Chang, Pei-Yao Ho, Wei-Ting Hsu, Yung-Ray Chen, Fang-Ting Chen, Yun-Ju J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) for pseudophakic vitrectomized eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) in a single institution. METHODS: Pseudophakic vitrectomized eyes with treatment-naïve center-involved DME were enrolled, with one eye in each patient. They were divided into two groups: one group receiving IDI every 3 to 4 months and another group receiving IVR using 3 monthly plus treat-and-extend injections, all with monthly follow-up for 6 months. Switch of intravitreal drugs or deferred macular laser was not allowed. Primary outcome measures included change in central foveal thickness (CFT) in 1 mm by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at Month 6. RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes were included in the IDI group and 26 eyes in the IVR group. The baseline demographics, glycosylated hemoglobin level, intraocular pressure (IOP), BCVA, and CFT did not significantly differ (p > 0.05). Compared to baseline data, CFT decreased and BCVA improved significantly after either IDI or IVR at Month 6 (p < 0.05). Significantly better mean final BCVA (0.38 logMAR vs. 0.62 logMAR, p=0.04), more mean visual gain (−0.30 logMAR vs. −0.15 logMAR, p=0.02), lower mean final CFT (310.9 μm vs. 384.2 μm, p=0.04), and larger mean CFT decrease (−150.0 μm vs. −60.1 μm, p=0.03) were found in the IDI group compared to those in the IVR group. A smaller mean treatment number (2.6 vs. 5.6, p < 0.001) and higher rate of postinjection ocular hypertension requiring topical hypotensive agent therapy (27.3% vs. 0%, p=0.0002) were demonstrated in the IDI group than those in the IVR group. CONCLUSION: We concluded that IDI and IVR can both effectively treat vitrectomized eyes with DME. Dexamethasone implants had significantly better visual/anatomical improvement, smaller treatment number, and higher rate of elevated IOP after injection than IVR in pseudophakic vitrectomized eyes with DME in a 6-month period. Hindawi 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8448602/ /pubmed/34540287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8882539 Text en Copyright © 2021 Jia-Kang Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Jia-Kang
Huang, Tzu-Lun
Chang, Pei-Yao
Ho, Wei-Ting
Hsu, Yung-Ray
Chen, Fang-Ting
Chen, Yun-Ju
Comparison of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Ranibizumab in Vitrectomized Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema
title Comparison of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Ranibizumab in Vitrectomized Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema
title_full Comparison of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Ranibizumab in Vitrectomized Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema
title_fullStr Comparison of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Ranibizumab in Vitrectomized Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Ranibizumab in Vitrectomized Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema
title_short Comparison of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Ranibizumab in Vitrectomized Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema
title_sort comparison of intravitreal dexamethasone implant and ranibizumab in vitrectomized eyes with diabetic macular edema
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8448602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8882539
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjiakang comparisonofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantandranibizumabinvitrectomizedeyeswithdiabeticmacularedema
AT huangtzulun comparisonofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantandranibizumabinvitrectomizedeyeswithdiabeticmacularedema
AT changpeiyao comparisonofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantandranibizumabinvitrectomizedeyeswithdiabeticmacularedema
AT howeiting comparisonofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantandranibizumabinvitrectomizedeyeswithdiabeticmacularedema
AT hsuyungray comparisonofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantandranibizumabinvitrectomizedeyeswithdiabeticmacularedema
AT chenfangting comparisonofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantandranibizumabinvitrectomizedeyeswithdiabeticmacularedema
AT chenyunju comparisonofintravitrealdexamethasoneimplantandranibizumabinvitrectomizedeyeswithdiabeticmacularedema