Cargando…

Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures

INTRODUCTION: A subtrochanteric proximal femur fracture occurs in the 5 cm of bone immediately distal to the lesser trochanter. UK national guidelines advise that adults with subtrochanteric fractures should be treated with an intramedullary nail (IMN). This study aims to compare peri-operative outc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arshad, Zaki, Thahir, Azeem, Rawal, Jaikirty, Hull, Peter D., Carrothers, Andrew D., Krkovic, Matija, Chou, Daud T. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8448703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02895-4
_version_ 1784569293194657792
author Arshad, Zaki
Thahir, Azeem
Rawal, Jaikirty
Hull, Peter D.
Carrothers, Andrew D.
Krkovic, Matija
Chou, Daud T. S.
author_facet Arshad, Zaki
Thahir, Azeem
Rawal, Jaikirty
Hull, Peter D.
Carrothers, Andrew D.
Krkovic, Matija
Chou, Daud T. S.
author_sort Arshad, Zaki
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A subtrochanteric proximal femur fracture occurs in the 5 cm of bone immediately distal to the lesser trochanter. UK national guidelines advise that adults with subtrochanteric fractures should be treated with an intramedullary nail (IMN). This study aims to compare peri-operative outcome measures of patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated with either an IMN or a dynamic hip screw (DHS) construct. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed subtrochanteric fractures presenting at our institution over 4.5 years (October 2014–May 2019), classifying them into two treatment groups; IMN and DHS. These groups were compared on outcome measures including surgical time, blood loss, radiation dose area product (DAP), length of stay, re-operation rate and mortality. RESULTS: During the time period studied, 86 patients presented with a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur; with 74 patients (86%) receiving an IMN and 12 (14%) receiving a DHS. The comparative outcome measures reaching statistical significance were blood loss and radiation DAP. The DHS group showed a significantly lower mean blood loss of 776 ml compared to 1029 ml in the IMN group. Also, the DHS group showed a significantly lower mean DAP of 150.30 mGy cm(2) compared to 288.86 mGy cm(2) in the IMN group. CONCLUSION: Although UK national guidelines recommend treating all subtrochanteric fractures with an IMN; the outcome measures assessed in our study did not show use of an IMN to be superior to a DHS. The DHS group showed a lower estimated blood loss and a reduced DAP. This, along with the reduced financial cost associated with a DHS, may support the use of DHS over IMN for certain subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. There may not be a single favourable implant for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures as a whole; instead different subtypes of fracture may be amenable to a number of fixation devices. Choice of implant should be determined locally and based on existing and future clinical and health economic research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8448703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84487032021-10-01 Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures Arshad, Zaki Thahir, Azeem Rawal, Jaikirty Hull, Peter D. Carrothers, Andrew D. Krkovic, Matija Chou, Daud T. S. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Original Article INTRODUCTION: A subtrochanteric proximal femur fracture occurs in the 5 cm of bone immediately distal to the lesser trochanter. UK national guidelines advise that adults with subtrochanteric fractures should be treated with an intramedullary nail (IMN). This study aims to compare peri-operative outcome measures of patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated with either an IMN or a dynamic hip screw (DHS) construct. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed subtrochanteric fractures presenting at our institution over 4.5 years (October 2014–May 2019), classifying them into two treatment groups; IMN and DHS. These groups were compared on outcome measures including surgical time, blood loss, radiation dose area product (DAP), length of stay, re-operation rate and mortality. RESULTS: During the time period studied, 86 patients presented with a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur; with 74 patients (86%) receiving an IMN and 12 (14%) receiving a DHS. The comparative outcome measures reaching statistical significance were blood loss and radiation DAP. The DHS group showed a significantly lower mean blood loss of 776 ml compared to 1029 ml in the IMN group. Also, the DHS group showed a significantly lower mean DAP of 150.30 mGy cm(2) compared to 288.86 mGy cm(2) in the IMN group. CONCLUSION: Although UK national guidelines recommend treating all subtrochanteric fractures with an IMN; the outcome measures assessed in our study did not show use of an IMN to be superior to a DHS. The DHS group showed a lower estimated blood loss and a reduced DAP. This, along with the reduced financial cost associated with a DHS, may support the use of DHS over IMN for certain subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. There may not be a single favourable implant for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures as a whole; instead different subtypes of fracture may be amenable to a number of fixation devices. Choice of implant should be determined locally and based on existing and future clinical and health economic research. Springer Paris 2021-02-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8448703/ /pubmed/33590318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02895-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Arshad, Zaki
Thahir, Azeem
Rawal, Jaikirty
Hull, Peter D.
Carrothers, Andrew D.
Krkovic, Matija
Chou, Daud T. S.
Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures
title Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures
title_full Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures
title_fullStr Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures
title_short Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures
title_sort dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8448703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02895-4
work_keys_str_mv AT arshadzaki dynamichipscrewfixationofsubtrochantericfemoralfractures
AT thahirazeem dynamichipscrewfixationofsubtrochantericfemoralfractures
AT rawaljaikirty dynamichipscrewfixationofsubtrochantericfemoralfractures
AT hullpeterd dynamichipscrewfixationofsubtrochantericfemoralfractures
AT carrothersandrewd dynamichipscrewfixationofsubtrochantericfemoralfractures
AT krkovicmatija dynamichipscrewfixationofsubtrochantericfemoralfractures
AT choudaudts dynamichipscrewfixationofsubtrochantericfemoralfractures