Cargando…

Brain structural connectivity, anhedonia, and phenotypes of major depressive disorder: A structural equation model approach

Aberrant brain structural connectivity in major depressive disorder (MDD) has been repeatedly reported, yet many previous studies lack integration of different features of MDD with structural connectivity in multivariate modeling approaches. In n = 595 MDD patients, we used structural equation model...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfarr, Julia‐Katharina, Brosch, Katharina, Meller, Tina, Ringwald, Kai Gustav, Schmitt, Simon, Stein, Frederike, Meinert, Susanne, Grotegerd, Dominik, Thiel, Katharina, Lemke, Hannah, Winter, Alexandra, Waltemate, Lena, Hahn, Tim, Opel, Nils, Repple, Jonathan, Bauer, Jochen, Jansen, Andreas, Dannlowski, Udo, Krug, Axel, Kircher, Tilo, Nenadić, Igor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34302413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25600
_version_ 1784569365273772032
author Pfarr, Julia‐Katharina
Brosch, Katharina
Meller, Tina
Ringwald, Kai Gustav
Schmitt, Simon
Stein, Frederike
Meinert, Susanne
Grotegerd, Dominik
Thiel, Katharina
Lemke, Hannah
Winter, Alexandra
Waltemate, Lena
Hahn, Tim
Opel, Nils
Repple, Jonathan
Bauer, Jochen
Jansen, Andreas
Dannlowski, Udo
Krug, Axel
Kircher, Tilo
Nenadić, Igor
author_facet Pfarr, Julia‐Katharina
Brosch, Katharina
Meller, Tina
Ringwald, Kai Gustav
Schmitt, Simon
Stein, Frederike
Meinert, Susanne
Grotegerd, Dominik
Thiel, Katharina
Lemke, Hannah
Winter, Alexandra
Waltemate, Lena
Hahn, Tim
Opel, Nils
Repple, Jonathan
Bauer, Jochen
Jansen, Andreas
Dannlowski, Udo
Krug, Axel
Kircher, Tilo
Nenadić, Igor
author_sort Pfarr, Julia‐Katharina
collection PubMed
description Aberrant brain structural connectivity in major depressive disorder (MDD) has been repeatedly reported, yet many previous studies lack integration of different features of MDD with structural connectivity in multivariate modeling approaches. In n = 595 MDD patients, we used structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the intercorrelations between anhedonia, anxiety, neuroticism, and cognitive control in one comprehensive model. We then separately analyzed diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) connectivity measures in association with those clinical variables, and finally integrated brain connectivity associations, clinical/cognitive variables into a multivariate SEM. We first confirmed our clinical/cognitive SEM. DTI analyses (FWE‐corrected) showed a positive correlation of anhedonia with fractional anisotropy (FA) in the right anterior thalamic radiation (ATR) and forceps minor/corpus callosum, while neuroticism was negatively correlated with axial diffusivity (AD) in the left uncinate fasciculus (UF) and inferior fronto‐occipital fasciculus (IFOF). An extended SEM confirmed the associations of ATR FA with anhedonia and UF/IFOF AD with neuroticism impacting on cognitive control. Our findings provide evidence for a differential impact of state and trait variables of MDD on brain connectivity and cognition. The multivariate approach shows feasibility of explaining heterogeneity within MDD and tracks this to specific brain circuits, thus adding to better understanding of heterogeneity on the biological level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8449111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84491112021-09-24 Brain structural connectivity, anhedonia, and phenotypes of major depressive disorder: A structural equation model approach Pfarr, Julia‐Katharina Brosch, Katharina Meller, Tina Ringwald, Kai Gustav Schmitt, Simon Stein, Frederike Meinert, Susanne Grotegerd, Dominik Thiel, Katharina Lemke, Hannah Winter, Alexandra Waltemate, Lena Hahn, Tim Opel, Nils Repple, Jonathan Bauer, Jochen Jansen, Andreas Dannlowski, Udo Krug, Axel Kircher, Tilo Nenadić, Igor Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Aberrant brain structural connectivity in major depressive disorder (MDD) has been repeatedly reported, yet many previous studies lack integration of different features of MDD with structural connectivity in multivariate modeling approaches. In n = 595 MDD patients, we used structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the intercorrelations between anhedonia, anxiety, neuroticism, and cognitive control in one comprehensive model. We then separately analyzed diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) connectivity measures in association with those clinical variables, and finally integrated brain connectivity associations, clinical/cognitive variables into a multivariate SEM. We first confirmed our clinical/cognitive SEM. DTI analyses (FWE‐corrected) showed a positive correlation of anhedonia with fractional anisotropy (FA) in the right anterior thalamic radiation (ATR) and forceps minor/corpus callosum, while neuroticism was negatively correlated with axial diffusivity (AD) in the left uncinate fasciculus (UF) and inferior fronto‐occipital fasciculus (IFOF). An extended SEM confirmed the associations of ATR FA with anhedonia and UF/IFOF AD with neuroticism impacting on cognitive control. Our findings provide evidence for a differential impact of state and trait variables of MDD on brain connectivity and cognition. The multivariate approach shows feasibility of explaining heterogeneity within MDD and tracks this to specific brain circuits, thus adding to better understanding of heterogeneity on the biological level. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8449111/ /pubmed/34302413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25600 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Pfarr, Julia‐Katharina
Brosch, Katharina
Meller, Tina
Ringwald, Kai Gustav
Schmitt, Simon
Stein, Frederike
Meinert, Susanne
Grotegerd, Dominik
Thiel, Katharina
Lemke, Hannah
Winter, Alexandra
Waltemate, Lena
Hahn, Tim
Opel, Nils
Repple, Jonathan
Bauer, Jochen
Jansen, Andreas
Dannlowski, Udo
Krug, Axel
Kircher, Tilo
Nenadić, Igor
Brain structural connectivity, anhedonia, and phenotypes of major depressive disorder: A structural equation model approach
title Brain structural connectivity, anhedonia, and phenotypes of major depressive disorder: A structural equation model approach
title_full Brain structural connectivity, anhedonia, and phenotypes of major depressive disorder: A structural equation model approach
title_fullStr Brain structural connectivity, anhedonia, and phenotypes of major depressive disorder: A structural equation model approach
title_full_unstemmed Brain structural connectivity, anhedonia, and phenotypes of major depressive disorder: A structural equation model approach
title_short Brain structural connectivity, anhedonia, and phenotypes of major depressive disorder: A structural equation model approach
title_sort brain structural connectivity, anhedonia, and phenotypes of major depressive disorder: a structural equation model approach
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34302413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25600
work_keys_str_mv AT pfarrjuliakatharina brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT broschkatharina brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT mellertina brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT ringwaldkaigustav brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT schmittsimon brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT steinfrederike brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT meinertsusanne brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT grotegerddominik brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT thielkatharina brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT lemkehannah brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT winteralexandra brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT waltematelena brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT hahntim brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT opelnils brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT repplejonathan brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT bauerjochen brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT jansenandreas brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT dannlowskiudo brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT krugaxel brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT kirchertilo brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach
AT nenadicigor brainstructuralconnectivityanhedoniaandphenotypesofmajordepressivedisorderastructuralequationmodelapproach