Cargando…

Interventions to reduce low-value imaging – a systematic review of interventions and outcomes

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 20–50% of all radiological examinations are of low value. Many attempts have been made to reduce the use of low-value imaging. However, the comparative effectiveness of interventions to reduce low-value imaging is unclear. Thus, the objective of this systematic revie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kjelle, Elin, Andersen, Eivind Richter, Soril, Lesley J. J., van Bodegom-Vos, Leti, Hofmann, Bjørn Morten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34537051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07004-z
_version_ 1784569384766799872
author Kjelle, Elin
Andersen, Eivind Richter
Soril, Lesley J. J.
van Bodegom-Vos, Leti
Hofmann, Bjørn Morten
author_facet Kjelle, Elin
Andersen, Eivind Richter
Soril, Lesley J. J.
van Bodegom-Vos, Leti
Hofmann, Bjørn Morten
author_sort Kjelle, Elin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 20–50% of all radiological examinations are of low value. Many attempts have been made to reduce the use of low-value imaging. However, the comparative effectiveness of interventions to reduce low-value imaging is unclear. Thus, the objective of this systematic review was to provide an overview and evaluate the outcomes of interventions aimed at reducing low-value imaging. METHODS: An electronic database search was completed in Medline – Ovid, Embase-Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for citations between 2010 and 2020. The search was built from medical subject headings for Diagnostic imaging/Radiology, Health service misuse or medical overuse, and Health planning. Keywords were used for the concept of reduction and avoidance. Reference lists of included articles were also hand-searched for relevant citations. Only articles written in English, German, Danish, Norwegian, Dutch, and Swedish were included. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to appraise the quality of the included articles. A narrative synthesis of the final included articles was completed. RESULTS: The search identified 15,659 records. After abstract and full-text screening, 95 studies of varying quality were included in the final analysis, containing 45 studies found through hand-searching techniques. Both controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after studies, time series, chart reviews, and cohort studies were included. Most interventions were aimed at referring physicians. Clinical practice guidelines (n = 28) and education (n = 28) were most commonly evaluated interventions, either alone or in combination with other components. Multi-component interventions were often more effective than single-component interventions showing a reduction in the use of low-value imaging in 94 and 74% of the studies, respectively. The most addressed types of imaging were musculoskeletal (n = 26), neurological (n = 23) and vascular (n = 16) imaging. Seventy-seven studies reported reduced low-value imaging, while 3 studies reported an increase. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-component interventions that include education were often more effective than single-component interventions. The contextual and cultural factors in the health care systems seem to be vital for successful reduction of low-value imaging. Further research should focus on assessing the impact of the context in interventions reducing low-value imaging and how interventions can be adapted to different contexts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07004-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8449221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84492212021-09-20 Interventions to reduce low-value imaging – a systematic review of interventions and outcomes Kjelle, Elin Andersen, Eivind Richter Soril, Lesley J. J. van Bodegom-Vos, Leti Hofmann, Bjørn Morten BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 20–50% of all radiological examinations are of low value. Many attempts have been made to reduce the use of low-value imaging. However, the comparative effectiveness of interventions to reduce low-value imaging is unclear. Thus, the objective of this systematic review was to provide an overview and evaluate the outcomes of interventions aimed at reducing low-value imaging. METHODS: An electronic database search was completed in Medline – Ovid, Embase-Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for citations between 2010 and 2020. The search was built from medical subject headings for Diagnostic imaging/Radiology, Health service misuse or medical overuse, and Health planning. Keywords were used for the concept of reduction and avoidance. Reference lists of included articles were also hand-searched for relevant citations. Only articles written in English, German, Danish, Norwegian, Dutch, and Swedish were included. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to appraise the quality of the included articles. A narrative synthesis of the final included articles was completed. RESULTS: The search identified 15,659 records. After abstract and full-text screening, 95 studies of varying quality were included in the final analysis, containing 45 studies found through hand-searching techniques. Both controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after studies, time series, chart reviews, and cohort studies were included. Most interventions were aimed at referring physicians. Clinical practice guidelines (n = 28) and education (n = 28) were most commonly evaluated interventions, either alone or in combination with other components. Multi-component interventions were often more effective than single-component interventions showing a reduction in the use of low-value imaging in 94 and 74% of the studies, respectively. The most addressed types of imaging were musculoskeletal (n = 26), neurological (n = 23) and vascular (n = 16) imaging. Seventy-seven studies reported reduced low-value imaging, while 3 studies reported an increase. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-component interventions that include education were often more effective than single-component interventions. The contextual and cultural factors in the health care systems seem to be vital for successful reduction of low-value imaging. Further research should focus on assessing the impact of the context in interventions reducing low-value imaging and how interventions can be adapted to different contexts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07004-z. BioMed Central 2021-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8449221/ /pubmed/34537051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07004-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kjelle, Elin
Andersen, Eivind Richter
Soril, Lesley J. J.
van Bodegom-Vos, Leti
Hofmann, Bjørn Morten
Interventions to reduce low-value imaging – a systematic review of interventions and outcomes
title Interventions to reduce low-value imaging – a systematic review of interventions and outcomes
title_full Interventions to reduce low-value imaging – a systematic review of interventions and outcomes
title_fullStr Interventions to reduce low-value imaging – a systematic review of interventions and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Interventions to reduce low-value imaging – a systematic review of interventions and outcomes
title_short Interventions to reduce low-value imaging – a systematic review of interventions and outcomes
title_sort interventions to reduce low-value imaging – a systematic review of interventions and outcomes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34537051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07004-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kjelleelin interventionstoreducelowvalueimagingasystematicreviewofinterventionsandoutcomes
AT anderseneivindrichter interventionstoreducelowvalueimagingasystematicreviewofinterventionsandoutcomes
AT sorillesleyjj interventionstoreducelowvalueimagingasystematicreviewofinterventionsandoutcomes
AT vanbodegomvosleti interventionstoreducelowvalueimagingasystematicreviewofinterventionsandoutcomes
AT hofmannbjørnmorten interventionstoreducelowvalueimagingasystematicreviewofinterventionsandoutcomes