Cargando…
Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study
BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that digital patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires and PRO-based decision support tools may help improve the active engagement of people with diabetes in self-care, thereby improving the quality of care. However, many barriers still exist for the real-wo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34477563 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28391 |
_version_ | 1784569404559720448 |
---|---|
author | Skovlund, Søren Eik Nicolucci, Antonio Balk-Møller, Nina Berthelsen, Dorthe B Glümer, Charlotte Perrild, Hans Kjær, Pernille Nørgaard, Lise Mellergaard Troelsen, Lise Havbæk Pietraszek, Anna Hessler, Danielle Kaplan, Sherrie Ejskjær, Niels |
author_facet | Skovlund, Søren Eik Nicolucci, Antonio Balk-Møller, Nina Berthelsen, Dorthe B Glümer, Charlotte Perrild, Hans Kjær, Pernille Nørgaard, Lise Mellergaard Troelsen, Lise Havbæk Pietraszek, Anna Hessler, Danielle Kaplan, Sherrie Ejskjær, Niels |
author_sort | Skovlund, Søren Eik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that digital patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires and PRO-based decision support tools may help improve the active engagement of people with diabetes in self-care, thereby improving the quality of care. However, many barriers still exist for the real-world effectiveness and implementation of such PRO tools in routine care. Furthermore, limited research has evaluated the acceptability, feasibility, and benefits of such tools across different health care settings. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and perceived benefits of the Danish digital PRO diabetes tool in different health care settings in Denmark and to determine the factors affecting its implementation. Furthermore, the study evaluates the psychometric characteristics of the Danish PRO Diabetes Questionnaire and the validity of the scoring algorithms for dialogue support. The objective of this study is to guide the ongoing optimization of the PRO diabetes tool, its implementation, and the design of future randomized controlled effectiveness studies. METHODS: We designed a multicenter, mixed methods, single-arm acceptability-feasibility implementation study protocol to contribute to the real-world pilot test of a new digital PRO diabetes tool in routine diabetes care. The use of the tool involves two main steps. First, the people with diabetes will complete a digital PRO Diabetes Questionnaire in the days before a routine diabetes visit. Second, the health care professional (HCP) will use a digital PRO tool to review the PRO results together with the people with diabetes during the visit. The PRO diabetes tool is designed to encourage and support people to take an active role for the people with diabetes in their own care and to expedite the delivery of person-centered, collaborative, and coordinated care. RESULTS: A multicenter pilot study protocol and psychometrically designed digital data collection tools for evaluation were developed and deployed as part of a national evaluation of a new digital PRO diabetes intervention. A total of 598 people with diabetes and 34 HCPs completed the study protocol by April 1, 2021. CONCLUSIONS: A large-scale, mixed methods, multicenter study for evaluating the use of the nationally developed PRO Diabetes Questionnaire in routine care across all health care sectors in Denmark by using the RE-AIM (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance) model as a framework has been designed and is ongoing. This study is expected to provide new important and detailed information about the real-world acceptability, perceived relevance, and benefits of the PRO diabetes tool among a large heterogeneous population of people with diabetes in Denmark and HCPs in different care settings. The results will be used to further improve the PRO tool, design implementation facilitation support strategies, and design future controlled effectiveness studies. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/28391 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8449301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84493012021-10-06 Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study Skovlund, Søren Eik Nicolucci, Antonio Balk-Møller, Nina Berthelsen, Dorthe B Glümer, Charlotte Perrild, Hans Kjær, Pernille Nørgaard, Lise Mellergaard Troelsen, Lise Havbæk Pietraszek, Anna Hessler, Danielle Kaplan, Sherrie Ejskjær, Niels JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that digital patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires and PRO-based decision support tools may help improve the active engagement of people with diabetes in self-care, thereby improving the quality of care. However, many barriers still exist for the real-world effectiveness and implementation of such PRO tools in routine care. Furthermore, limited research has evaluated the acceptability, feasibility, and benefits of such tools across different health care settings. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and perceived benefits of the Danish digital PRO diabetes tool in different health care settings in Denmark and to determine the factors affecting its implementation. Furthermore, the study evaluates the psychometric characteristics of the Danish PRO Diabetes Questionnaire and the validity of the scoring algorithms for dialogue support. The objective of this study is to guide the ongoing optimization of the PRO diabetes tool, its implementation, and the design of future randomized controlled effectiveness studies. METHODS: We designed a multicenter, mixed methods, single-arm acceptability-feasibility implementation study protocol to contribute to the real-world pilot test of a new digital PRO diabetes tool in routine diabetes care. The use of the tool involves two main steps. First, the people with diabetes will complete a digital PRO Diabetes Questionnaire in the days before a routine diabetes visit. Second, the health care professional (HCP) will use a digital PRO tool to review the PRO results together with the people with diabetes during the visit. The PRO diabetes tool is designed to encourage and support people to take an active role for the people with diabetes in their own care and to expedite the delivery of person-centered, collaborative, and coordinated care. RESULTS: A multicenter pilot study protocol and psychometrically designed digital data collection tools for evaluation were developed and deployed as part of a national evaluation of a new digital PRO diabetes intervention. A total of 598 people with diabetes and 34 HCPs completed the study protocol by April 1, 2021. CONCLUSIONS: A large-scale, mixed methods, multicenter study for evaluating the use of the nationally developed PRO Diabetes Questionnaire in routine care across all health care sectors in Denmark by using the RE-AIM (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance) model as a framework has been designed and is ongoing. This study is expected to provide new important and detailed information about the real-world acceptability, perceived relevance, and benefits of the PRO diabetes tool among a large heterogeneous population of people with diabetes in Denmark and HCPs in different care settings. The results will be used to further improve the PRO tool, design implementation facilitation support strategies, and design future controlled effectiveness studies. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/28391 JMIR Publications 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8449301/ /pubmed/34477563 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28391 Text en ©Søren Eik Skovlund, Antonio Nicolucci, Nina Balk-Møller, Dorthe B Berthelsen, Charlotte Glümer, Hans Perrild, Pernille Kjær, Lise Mellergaard Nørgaard, Lise Havbæk Troelsen, Anna Pietraszek, Danielle Hessler, Sherrie Kaplan, Niels Ejskjær. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 03.09.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Skovlund, Søren Eik Nicolucci, Antonio Balk-Møller, Nina Berthelsen, Dorthe B Glümer, Charlotte Perrild, Hans Kjær, Pernille Nørgaard, Lise Mellergaard Troelsen, Lise Havbæk Pietraszek, Anna Hessler, Danielle Kaplan, Sherrie Ejskjær, Niels Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study |
title | Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study |
title_full | Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study |
title_fullStr | Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study |
title_short | Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study |
title_sort | perceived benefits, barriers, and facilitators of a digital patient-reported outcomes tool for routine diabetes care: protocol for a national, multicenter, mixed methods implementation study |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34477563 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28391 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skovlundsøreneik perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy AT nicolucciantonio perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy AT balkmøllernina perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy AT berthelsendortheb perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy AT glumercharlotte perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy AT perrildhans perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy AT kjærpernille perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy AT nørgaardlisemellergaard perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy AT troelsenlisehavbæk perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy AT pietraszekanna perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy AT hesslerdanielle perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy AT kaplansherrie perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy AT ejskjærniels perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy |