Cargando…

Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that digital patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires and PRO-based decision support tools may help improve the active engagement of people with diabetes in self-care, thereby improving the quality of care. However, many barriers still exist for the real-wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skovlund, Søren Eik, Nicolucci, Antonio, Balk-Møller, Nina, Berthelsen, Dorthe B, Glümer, Charlotte, Perrild, Hans, Kjær, Pernille, Nørgaard, Lise Mellergaard, Troelsen, Lise Havbæk, Pietraszek, Anna, Hessler, Danielle, Kaplan, Sherrie, Ejskjær, Niels
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34477563
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28391
_version_ 1784569404559720448
author Skovlund, Søren Eik
Nicolucci, Antonio
Balk-Møller, Nina
Berthelsen, Dorthe B
Glümer, Charlotte
Perrild, Hans
Kjær, Pernille
Nørgaard, Lise Mellergaard
Troelsen, Lise Havbæk
Pietraszek, Anna
Hessler, Danielle
Kaplan, Sherrie
Ejskjær, Niels
author_facet Skovlund, Søren Eik
Nicolucci, Antonio
Balk-Møller, Nina
Berthelsen, Dorthe B
Glümer, Charlotte
Perrild, Hans
Kjær, Pernille
Nørgaard, Lise Mellergaard
Troelsen, Lise Havbæk
Pietraszek, Anna
Hessler, Danielle
Kaplan, Sherrie
Ejskjær, Niels
author_sort Skovlund, Søren Eik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that digital patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires and PRO-based decision support tools may help improve the active engagement of people with diabetes in self-care, thereby improving the quality of care. However, many barriers still exist for the real-world effectiveness and implementation of such PRO tools in routine care. Furthermore, limited research has evaluated the acceptability, feasibility, and benefits of such tools across different health care settings. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and perceived benefits of the Danish digital PRO diabetes tool in different health care settings in Denmark and to determine the factors affecting its implementation. Furthermore, the study evaluates the psychometric characteristics of the Danish PRO Diabetes Questionnaire and the validity of the scoring algorithms for dialogue support. The objective of this study is to guide the ongoing optimization of the PRO diabetes tool, its implementation, and the design of future randomized controlled effectiveness studies. METHODS: We designed a multicenter, mixed methods, single-arm acceptability-feasibility implementation study protocol to contribute to the real-world pilot test of a new digital PRO diabetes tool in routine diabetes care. The use of the tool involves two main steps. First, the people with diabetes will complete a digital PRO Diabetes Questionnaire in the days before a routine diabetes visit. Second, the health care professional (HCP) will use a digital PRO tool to review the PRO results together with the people with diabetes during the visit. The PRO diabetes tool is designed to encourage and support people to take an active role for the people with diabetes in their own care and to expedite the delivery of person-centered, collaborative, and coordinated care. RESULTS: A multicenter pilot study protocol and psychometrically designed digital data collection tools for evaluation were developed and deployed as part of a national evaluation of a new digital PRO diabetes intervention. A total of 598 people with diabetes and 34 HCPs completed the study protocol by April 1, 2021. CONCLUSIONS: A large-scale, mixed methods, multicenter study for evaluating the use of the nationally developed PRO Diabetes Questionnaire in routine care across all health care sectors in Denmark by using the RE-AIM (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance) model as a framework has been designed and is ongoing. This study is expected to provide new important and detailed information about the real-world acceptability, perceived relevance, and benefits of the PRO diabetes tool among a large heterogeneous population of people with diabetes in Denmark and HCPs in different care settings. The results will be used to further improve the PRO tool, design implementation facilitation support strategies, and design future controlled effectiveness studies. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/28391
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8449301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84493012021-10-06 Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study Skovlund, Søren Eik Nicolucci, Antonio Balk-Møller, Nina Berthelsen, Dorthe B Glümer, Charlotte Perrild, Hans Kjær, Pernille Nørgaard, Lise Mellergaard Troelsen, Lise Havbæk Pietraszek, Anna Hessler, Danielle Kaplan, Sherrie Ejskjær, Niels JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that digital patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires and PRO-based decision support tools may help improve the active engagement of people with diabetes in self-care, thereby improving the quality of care. However, many barriers still exist for the real-world effectiveness and implementation of such PRO tools in routine care. Furthermore, limited research has evaluated the acceptability, feasibility, and benefits of such tools across different health care settings. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and perceived benefits of the Danish digital PRO diabetes tool in different health care settings in Denmark and to determine the factors affecting its implementation. Furthermore, the study evaluates the psychometric characteristics of the Danish PRO Diabetes Questionnaire and the validity of the scoring algorithms for dialogue support. The objective of this study is to guide the ongoing optimization of the PRO diabetes tool, its implementation, and the design of future randomized controlled effectiveness studies. METHODS: We designed a multicenter, mixed methods, single-arm acceptability-feasibility implementation study protocol to contribute to the real-world pilot test of a new digital PRO diabetes tool in routine diabetes care. The use of the tool involves two main steps. First, the people with diabetes will complete a digital PRO Diabetes Questionnaire in the days before a routine diabetes visit. Second, the health care professional (HCP) will use a digital PRO tool to review the PRO results together with the people with diabetes during the visit. The PRO diabetes tool is designed to encourage and support people to take an active role for the people with diabetes in their own care and to expedite the delivery of person-centered, collaborative, and coordinated care. RESULTS: A multicenter pilot study protocol and psychometrically designed digital data collection tools for evaluation were developed and deployed as part of a national evaluation of a new digital PRO diabetes intervention. A total of 598 people with diabetes and 34 HCPs completed the study protocol by April 1, 2021. CONCLUSIONS: A large-scale, mixed methods, multicenter study for evaluating the use of the nationally developed PRO Diabetes Questionnaire in routine care across all health care sectors in Denmark by using the RE-AIM (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance) model as a framework has been designed and is ongoing. This study is expected to provide new important and detailed information about the real-world acceptability, perceived relevance, and benefits of the PRO diabetes tool among a large heterogeneous population of people with diabetes in Denmark and HCPs in different care settings. The results will be used to further improve the PRO tool, design implementation facilitation support strategies, and design future controlled effectiveness studies. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/28391 JMIR Publications 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8449301/ /pubmed/34477563 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28391 Text en ©Søren Eik Skovlund, Antonio Nicolucci, Nina Balk-Møller, Dorthe B Berthelsen, Charlotte Glümer, Hans Perrild, Pernille Kjær, Lise Mellergaard Nørgaard, Lise Havbæk Troelsen, Anna Pietraszek, Danielle Hessler, Sherrie Kaplan, Niels Ejskjær. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 03.09.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Skovlund, Søren Eik
Nicolucci, Antonio
Balk-Møller, Nina
Berthelsen, Dorthe B
Glümer, Charlotte
Perrild, Hans
Kjær, Pernille
Nørgaard, Lise Mellergaard
Troelsen, Lise Havbæk
Pietraszek, Anna
Hessler, Danielle
Kaplan, Sherrie
Ejskjær, Niels
Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study
title Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study
title_full Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study
title_fullStr Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study
title_full_unstemmed Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study
title_short Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study
title_sort perceived benefits, barriers, and facilitators of a digital patient-reported outcomes tool for routine diabetes care: protocol for a national, multicenter, mixed methods implementation study
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34477563
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28391
work_keys_str_mv AT skovlundsøreneik perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT nicolucciantonio perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT balkmøllernina perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT berthelsendortheb perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT glumercharlotte perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT perrildhans perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT kjærpernille perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT nørgaardlisemellergaard perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT troelsenlisehavbæk perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT pietraszekanna perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT hesslerdanielle perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT kaplansherrie perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT ejskjærniels perceivedbenefitsbarriersandfacilitatorsofadigitalpatientreportedoutcomestoolforroutinediabetescareprotocolforanationalmulticentermixedmethodsimplementationstudy