Cargando…

E-Mentoring to Address Youth Health: A Systematic Review

Electronic mentoring (e-mentoring), the integration of digital technology in mentoring relationships, has recently grown in popularity; however, the effectiveness of e-mentoring in addressing youth health has not been synthesized to date. The current study synthesizes the literature on e-mentoring t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaufman, Michelle R., Levine, Deb, Casella, Albert, DuBois, David L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40894-021-00172-3
_version_ 1784569470449090560
author Kaufman, Michelle R.
Levine, Deb
Casella, Albert
DuBois, David L.
author_facet Kaufman, Michelle R.
Levine, Deb
Casella, Albert
DuBois, David L.
author_sort Kaufman, Michelle R.
collection PubMed
description Electronic mentoring (e-mentoring), the integration of digital technology in mentoring relationships, has recently grown in popularity; however, the effectiveness of e-mentoring in addressing youth health has not been synthesized to date. The current study synthesizes the literature on e-mentoring to affect the health and well-being of youth (10–24 years) through a systematic review and evidence quality assessment. A total of 833 records were identified, of which 14 met eligibility criteria (published in English since 1995, targeted youth health and/or youth with health issues, and communication was entirely digital or combined with in-person interaction). The results showed that the majority of health-focused e-mentoring studies were conducted with young people with existing health conditions rather than on the use of e-mentoring to promote overall health and wellness. The included programs focused largely on bringing mentoring to youth subpopulations that may be challenged by in-person models. Quality assessments of the included studies showed that the strength of the evidence is mediocre. The findings suggest that e-mentoring has the potential to reach youth with unique health concerns and to promote independent management of health conditions as youth transition to adulthood; however, more rigorous evaluation of e-mentoring programs with larger sample sizes is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40894-021-00172-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8449692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84496922021-09-20 E-Mentoring to Address Youth Health: A Systematic Review Kaufman, Michelle R. Levine, Deb Casella, Albert DuBois, David L. Adolesc Res Rev Systematic Review Electronic mentoring (e-mentoring), the integration of digital technology in mentoring relationships, has recently grown in popularity; however, the effectiveness of e-mentoring in addressing youth health has not been synthesized to date. The current study synthesizes the literature on e-mentoring to affect the health and well-being of youth (10–24 years) through a systematic review and evidence quality assessment. A total of 833 records were identified, of which 14 met eligibility criteria (published in English since 1995, targeted youth health and/or youth with health issues, and communication was entirely digital or combined with in-person interaction). The results showed that the majority of health-focused e-mentoring studies were conducted with young people with existing health conditions rather than on the use of e-mentoring to promote overall health and wellness. The included programs focused largely on bringing mentoring to youth subpopulations that may be challenged by in-person models. Quality assessments of the included studies showed that the strength of the evidence is mediocre. The findings suggest that e-mentoring has the potential to reach youth with unique health concerns and to promote independent management of health conditions as youth transition to adulthood; however, more rigorous evaluation of e-mentoring programs with larger sample sizes is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40894-021-00172-3. Springer International Publishing 2021-09-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8449692/ /pubmed/34568546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40894-021-00172-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Kaufman, Michelle R.
Levine, Deb
Casella, Albert
DuBois, David L.
E-Mentoring to Address Youth Health: A Systematic Review
title E-Mentoring to Address Youth Health: A Systematic Review
title_full E-Mentoring to Address Youth Health: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr E-Mentoring to Address Youth Health: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed E-Mentoring to Address Youth Health: A Systematic Review
title_short E-Mentoring to Address Youth Health: A Systematic Review
title_sort e-mentoring to address youth health: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40894-021-00172-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kaufmanmicheller ementoringtoaddressyouthhealthasystematicreview
AT levinedeb ementoringtoaddressyouthhealthasystematicreview
AT casellaalbert ementoringtoaddressyouthhealthasystematicreview
AT duboisdavidl ementoringtoaddressyouthhealthasystematicreview