Cargando…
Ross for Valve replacement In AduLts (REVIVAL) pilot trial: rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: In non-elderly adults, aortic valve replacement (AVR) with conventional prostheses yield poor long-term outcomes. Recent publications suggest a benefit of the Ross procedure over conventional AVR and highlight the need for high-quality randomised controlled trial (RCTs) on the optimal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34531204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046198 |
_version_ | 1784569527926784000 |
---|---|
author | Whitlock, Richard Belley-Cote, Emilie Rega, Filip Chu, Michael W.A. McClure, Graham R Hronyecz, Hanna Verbrugghe, Peter Devereaux, PJ Bangdiwala, Shrikant Eikelboom, John Brady, Katheryn Sharifulin, Ravil Bogachev-Prokophiev, Alexander Stoica, Serban |
author_facet | Whitlock, Richard Belley-Cote, Emilie Rega, Filip Chu, Michael W.A. McClure, Graham R Hronyecz, Hanna Verbrugghe, Peter Devereaux, PJ Bangdiwala, Shrikant Eikelboom, John Brady, Katheryn Sharifulin, Ravil Bogachev-Prokophiev, Alexander Stoica, Serban |
author_sort | Whitlock, Richard |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In non-elderly adults, aortic valve replacement (AVR) with conventional prostheses yield poor long-term outcomes. Recent publications suggest a benefit of the Ross procedure over conventional AVR and highlight the need for high-quality randomised controlled trial (RCTs) on the optimal AVR. We have initiated a pilot trial assess two feasibility criteria and one assumption: (1) evaluate the capacity to enrol six patients per centre per year in at least five international centre, (2) validate greater than 90% compliance with allocation and (3) to validate the proportion of mechanical (≥65%) vs biological (≤35%) valves in the conventional arm. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Ross for Valve replacement In AduLts (REVIVAL) is a multinational, expertise-based RCT in adults aged 18–60 years undergoing AVR, comparing the Ross procedure versus one of the alternative approaches (mechanical vs stented or stentless bioprosthesis). The feasibility objectives will be assessed after randomising 60 patients; we will then make a decision regarding whether to expand the trial with the current protocol. We will ultimately examine the impact of the Ross procedure as compared with conventional AVR in non-elderly adults on survival free of valve-related life-threatening complications (major bleeding, systemic thromboembolism, valve thrombosis and valve reoperation) over the duration of follow-up. The objectives of the pilot trial will be analysed using descriptive statistics. In the full trial, the intention-to-treat principle will guide all primary analyses. A time-to-event analysis will be performed and Kaplan-Meier survival curves with comparison between groups using a log rank test will be presented. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: REVIVAL will answer whether non-elderly adults benefit from the Ross procedure over conventional valve replacement. The final results at major meetings, journals, regional seminars, hospital rounds and via the Reducing Global Perioperative Risk Multimedia Resource Centre. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03798782 PROTOCOL VERSION: January 29, 2019 (Final Version 1.0) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8449981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84499812021-10-01 Ross for Valve replacement In AduLts (REVIVAL) pilot trial: rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial Whitlock, Richard Belley-Cote, Emilie Rega, Filip Chu, Michael W.A. McClure, Graham R Hronyecz, Hanna Verbrugghe, Peter Devereaux, PJ Bangdiwala, Shrikant Eikelboom, John Brady, Katheryn Sharifulin, Ravil Bogachev-Prokophiev, Alexander Stoica, Serban BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: In non-elderly adults, aortic valve replacement (AVR) with conventional prostheses yield poor long-term outcomes. Recent publications suggest a benefit of the Ross procedure over conventional AVR and highlight the need for high-quality randomised controlled trial (RCTs) on the optimal AVR. We have initiated a pilot trial assess two feasibility criteria and one assumption: (1) evaluate the capacity to enrol six patients per centre per year in at least five international centre, (2) validate greater than 90% compliance with allocation and (3) to validate the proportion of mechanical (≥65%) vs biological (≤35%) valves in the conventional arm. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Ross for Valve replacement In AduLts (REVIVAL) is a multinational, expertise-based RCT in adults aged 18–60 years undergoing AVR, comparing the Ross procedure versus one of the alternative approaches (mechanical vs stented or stentless bioprosthesis). The feasibility objectives will be assessed after randomising 60 patients; we will then make a decision regarding whether to expand the trial with the current protocol. We will ultimately examine the impact of the Ross procedure as compared with conventional AVR in non-elderly adults on survival free of valve-related life-threatening complications (major bleeding, systemic thromboembolism, valve thrombosis and valve reoperation) over the duration of follow-up. The objectives of the pilot trial will be analysed using descriptive statistics. In the full trial, the intention-to-treat principle will guide all primary analyses. A time-to-event analysis will be performed and Kaplan-Meier survival curves with comparison between groups using a log rank test will be presented. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: REVIVAL will answer whether non-elderly adults benefit from the Ross procedure over conventional valve replacement. The final results at major meetings, journals, regional seminars, hospital rounds and via the Reducing Global Perioperative Risk Multimedia Resource Centre. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03798782 PROTOCOL VERSION: January 29, 2019 (Final Version 1.0) BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8449981/ /pubmed/34531204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046198 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Surgery Whitlock, Richard Belley-Cote, Emilie Rega, Filip Chu, Michael W.A. McClure, Graham R Hronyecz, Hanna Verbrugghe, Peter Devereaux, PJ Bangdiwala, Shrikant Eikelboom, John Brady, Katheryn Sharifulin, Ravil Bogachev-Prokophiev, Alexander Stoica, Serban Ross for Valve replacement In AduLts (REVIVAL) pilot trial: rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial |
title | Ross for Valve replacement In AduLts (REVIVAL) pilot trial: rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Ross for Valve replacement In AduLts (REVIVAL) pilot trial: rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Ross for Valve replacement In AduLts (REVIVAL) pilot trial: rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Ross for Valve replacement In AduLts (REVIVAL) pilot trial: rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Ross for Valve replacement In AduLts (REVIVAL) pilot trial: rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | ross for valve replacement in adults (revival) pilot trial: rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34531204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitlockrichard rossforvalvereplacementinadultsrevivalpilottrialrationaleanddesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT belleycoteemilie rossforvalvereplacementinadultsrevivalpilottrialrationaleanddesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT regafilip rossforvalvereplacementinadultsrevivalpilottrialrationaleanddesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT chumichaelwa rossforvalvereplacementinadultsrevivalpilottrialrationaleanddesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mccluregrahamr rossforvalvereplacementinadultsrevivalpilottrialrationaleanddesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hronyeczhanna rossforvalvereplacementinadultsrevivalpilottrialrationaleanddesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT verbrugghepeter rossforvalvereplacementinadultsrevivalpilottrialrationaleanddesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT devereauxpj rossforvalvereplacementinadultsrevivalpilottrialrationaleanddesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bangdiwalashrikant rossforvalvereplacementinadultsrevivalpilottrialrationaleanddesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT eikelboomjohn rossforvalvereplacementinadultsrevivalpilottrialrationaleanddesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bradykatheryn rossforvalvereplacementinadultsrevivalpilottrialrationaleanddesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sharifulinravil rossforvalvereplacementinadultsrevivalpilottrialrationaleanddesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bogachevprokophievalexander rossforvalvereplacementinadultsrevivalpilottrialrationaleanddesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stoicaserban rossforvalvereplacementinadultsrevivalpilottrialrationaleanddesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial |