Cargando…

Protocol for implementation of the ‘AusPROM’ recommendations for elective surgery patients: a mixed-methods cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into usual care in hospitals can improve safety and quality. Gaps exist in electronic PROM (ePROM) implementation recommendations, including for elective surgery. The aims are to: (1) understand barriers and enablers to ePROM impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Meg E, Brusco, Natasha, Woods, Jeffrey, Myles, Paul S, Hodge, Anita, Jones, Cathy, Lloyd, Damien, Rovtar, Vincent, Clifford, Amanda, Atkinson, Victoria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34531213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049937
_version_ 1784569528222482432
author Morris, Meg E
Brusco, Natasha
Woods, Jeffrey
Myles, Paul S
Hodge, Anita
Jones, Cathy
Lloyd, Damien
Rovtar, Vincent
Clifford, Amanda
Atkinson, Victoria
author_facet Morris, Meg E
Brusco, Natasha
Woods, Jeffrey
Myles, Paul S
Hodge, Anita
Jones, Cathy
Lloyd, Damien
Rovtar, Vincent
Clifford, Amanda
Atkinson, Victoria
author_sort Morris, Meg E
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into usual care in hospitals can improve safety and quality. Gaps exist in electronic PROM (ePROM) implementation recommendations, including for elective surgery. The aims are to: (1) understand barriers and enablers to ePROM implementation in hospitals and develop Australian ePROM implementation recommendations (AusPROM); (2) test the feasibility and acceptability of the Quality of Recovery 15 item short-form (QoR-15) PROM for elective surgery patients applying the AusPROM and (3) establish if the QoR-15 PROM has concurrent validity with the EQ-5D-5L. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Phase I will identify staff barriers and facilitators for the implementation of the AusPROM recommendations using a Delphi technique. Phase II will determine QoR-15 acceptability for elective surgery patients across four pilot hospitals, using the AusPROM recommendations. For phase II, in addition to a consumer focus group, patients will complete brief acceptability surveys, incorporating the QoR-15, in the week prior to surgery, in the week following surgery and 4 weeks postsurgery. The primary endpoint will be 4 weeks postsurgery. Phase III will be the national implementation of the AusPROM (29 hospitals) and the concurrent validity of the QoR-15 and generic EQ-5D-5L. This protocol adopts the Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trials Protocols guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results will be disseminated via public forums, conferences and peer-reviewed journals. Ethics approval: La Trobe University (HEC20479). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621000298819 (Phase I and II) and ACTRN12621000969864 (Phase III)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8449982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84499822021-10-01 Protocol for implementation of the ‘AusPROM’ recommendations for elective surgery patients: a mixed-methods cohort study Morris, Meg E Brusco, Natasha Woods, Jeffrey Myles, Paul S Hodge, Anita Jones, Cathy Lloyd, Damien Rovtar, Vincent Clifford, Amanda Atkinson, Victoria BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: Incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into usual care in hospitals can improve safety and quality. Gaps exist in electronic PROM (ePROM) implementation recommendations, including for elective surgery. The aims are to: (1) understand barriers and enablers to ePROM implementation in hospitals and develop Australian ePROM implementation recommendations (AusPROM); (2) test the feasibility and acceptability of the Quality of Recovery 15 item short-form (QoR-15) PROM for elective surgery patients applying the AusPROM and (3) establish if the QoR-15 PROM has concurrent validity with the EQ-5D-5L. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Phase I will identify staff barriers and facilitators for the implementation of the AusPROM recommendations using a Delphi technique. Phase II will determine QoR-15 acceptability for elective surgery patients across four pilot hospitals, using the AusPROM recommendations. For phase II, in addition to a consumer focus group, patients will complete brief acceptability surveys, incorporating the QoR-15, in the week prior to surgery, in the week following surgery and 4 weeks postsurgery. The primary endpoint will be 4 weeks postsurgery. Phase III will be the national implementation of the AusPROM (29 hospitals) and the concurrent validity of the QoR-15 and generic EQ-5D-5L. This protocol adopts the Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trials Protocols guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results will be disseminated via public forums, conferences and peer-reviewed journals. Ethics approval: La Trobe University (HEC20479). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621000298819 (Phase I and II) and ACTRN12621000969864 (Phase III) BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8449982/ /pubmed/34531213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049937 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Morris, Meg E
Brusco, Natasha
Woods, Jeffrey
Myles, Paul S
Hodge, Anita
Jones, Cathy
Lloyd, Damien
Rovtar, Vincent
Clifford, Amanda
Atkinson, Victoria
Protocol for implementation of the ‘AusPROM’ recommendations for elective surgery patients: a mixed-methods cohort study
title Protocol for implementation of the ‘AusPROM’ recommendations for elective surgery patients: a mixed-methods cohort study
title_full Protocol for implementation of the ‘AusPROM’ recommendations for elective surgery patients: a mixed-methods cohort study
title_fullStr Protocol for implementation of the ‘AusPROM’ recommendations for elective surgery patients: a mixed-methods cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for implementation of the ‘AusPROM’ recommendations for elective surgery patients: a mixed-methods cohort study
title_short Protocol for implementation of the ‘AusPROM’ recommendations for elective surgery patients: a mixed-methods cohort study
title_sort protocol for implementation of the ‘ausprom’ recommendations for elective surgery patients: a mixed-methods cohort study
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34531213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049937
work_keys_str_mv AT morrismege protocolforimplementationoftheauspromrecommendationsforelectivesurgerypatientsamixedmethodscohortstudy
AT brusconatasha protocolforimplementationoftheauspromrecommendationsforelectivesurgerypatientsamixedmethodscohortstudy
AT woodsjeffrey protocolforimplementationoftheauspromrecommendationsforelectivesurgerypatientsamixedmethodscohortstudy
AT mylespauls protocolforimplementationoftheauspromrecommendationsforelectivesurgerypatientsamixedmethodscohortstudy
AT hodgeanita protocolforimplementationoftheauspromrecommendationsforelectivesurgerypatientsamixedmethodscohortstudy
AT jonescathy protocolforimplementationoftheauspromrecommendationsforelectivesurgerypatientsamixedmethodscohortstudy
AT lloyddamien protocolforimplementationoftheauspromrecommendationsforelectivesurgerypatientsamixedmethodscohortstudy
AT rovtarvincent protocolforimplementationoftheauspromrecommendationsforelectivesurgerypatientsamixedmethodscohortstudy
AT cliffordamanda protocolforimplementationoftheauspromrecommendationsforelectivesurgerypatientsamixedmethodscohortstudy
AT atkinsonvictoria protocolforimplementationoftheauspromrecommendationsforelectivesurgerypatientsamixedmethodscohortstudy