Cargando…

Experiences of trial participants and site staff of participating in and running a large randomised trial within fertility (the endometrial scratch trial): a qualitative interview study

OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences of endometrial scratch (ES) trial participants and site staff of trial recruitment and participation, in order to improve the experience of participants in future trials. DESIGN: Qualitative study of a subset of participants in the ES randomised controlled tria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chatters, Robin, White, David, Pye, Clare, Petrovic, Ana, Sizer, Anya, Kumar, Pavithra, Metwally, Mostafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34531221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051698
_version_ 1784569528488820736
author Chatters, Robin
White, David
Pye, Clare
Petrovic, Ana
Sizer, Anya
Kumar, Pavithra
Metwally, Mostafa
author_facet Chatters, Robin
White, David
Pye, Clare
Petrovic, Ana
Sizer, Anya
Kumar, Pavithra
Metwally, Mostafa
author_sort Chatters, Robin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences of endometrial scratch (ES) trial participants and site staff of trial recruitment and participation, in order to improve the experience of participants in future trials. DESIGN: Qualitative study of a subset of participants in the ES randomised controlled trial and a subset of trial site staff. SETTING: A purposeful sample of 9 of the 16 UK Fertility Units that participated in the trial. PARTICIPANTS: A purposeful sample of 27 trial participants and 7 site staff. RESULTS: Participants were largely happy with the recruitment practices, however, some were overwhelmed with the amount of information received. Interviewees had positive preconceptions regarding the possible effect of the ES on the outcome of their in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle, which often originated from their own internet research and seemed to be exacerbated by how site staff described the intervention. Some participants appeared to not understand that receiving the ES could potentially reduce their chances of a successful IVF outcome. Those randomised to the control arm discussed feeling discontent; site staff developed mechanisms of dealing with this. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of equipoise in both study participants and the recruiting site staff led to trial participants having positive preconceptions of the potential impact of the ES on their upcoming IVF cycle. Trial participants may not have understood the potential harms of participating in a randomised trial. The trial information sheet did not clearly state this; further research should assess how such information should be presented to potential participants, to proportionately present the level of risk, but to not unduly discourage participation. The amount of information fertility patients require about a research study should also be investigated, in order to avoid participants feeling overwhelmed by the amount of information they receive prior to starting IVF. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN23800982.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8449983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84499832021-10-01 Experiences of trial participants and site staff of participating in and running a large randomised trial within fertility (the endometrial scratch trial): a qualitative interview study Chatters, Robin White, David Pye, Clare Petrovic, Ana Sizer, Anya Kumar, Pavithra Metwally, Mostafa BMJ Open Reproductive Medicine OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences of endometrial scratch (ES) trial participants and site staff of trial recruitment and participation, in order to improve the experience of participants in future trials. DESIGN: Qualitative study of a subset of participants in the ES randomised controlled trial and a subset of trial site staff. SETTING: A purposeful sample of 9 of the 16 UK Fertility Units that participated in the trial. PARTICIPANTS: A purposeful sample of 27 trial participants and 7 site staff. RESULTS: Participants were largely happy with the recruitment practices, however, some were overwhelmed with the amount of information received. Interviewees had positive preconceptions regarding the possible effect of the ES on the outcome of their in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle, which often originated from their own internet research and seemed to be exacerbated by how site staff described the intervention. Some participants appeared to not understand that receiving the ES could potentially reduce their chances of a successful IVF outcome. Those randomised to the control arm discussed feeling discontent; site staff developed mechanisms of dealing with this. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of equipoise in both study participants and the recruiting site staff led to trial participants having positive preconceptions of the potential impact of the ES on their upcoming IVF cycle. Trial participants may not have understood the potential harms of participating in a randomised trial. The trial information sheet did not clearly state this; further research should assess how such information should be presented to potential participants, to proportionately present the level of risk, but to not unduly discourage participation. The amount of information fertility patients require about a research study should also be investigated, in order to avoid participants feeling overwhelmed by the amount of information they receive prior to starting IVF. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN23800982. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8449983/ /pubmed/34531221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051698 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Reproductive Medicine
Chatters, Robin
White, David
Pye, Clare
Petrovic, Ana
Sizer, Anya
Kumar, Pavithra
Metwally, Mostafa
Experiences of trial participants and site staff of participating in and running a large randomised trial within fertility (the endometrial scratch trial): a qualitative interview study
title Experiences of trial participants and site staff of participating in and running a large randomised trial within fertility (the endometrial scratch trial): a qualitative interview study
title_full Experiences of trial participants and site staff of participating in and running a large randomised trial within fertility (the endometrial scratch trial): a qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Experiences of trial participants and site staff of participating in and running a large randomised trial within fertility (the endometrial scratch trial): a qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Experiences of trial participants and site staff of participating in and running a large randomised trial within fertility (the endometrial scratch trial): a qualitative interview study
title_short Experiences of trial participants and site staff of participating in and running a large randomised trial within fertility (the endometrial scratch trial): a qualitative interview study
title_sort experiences of trial participants and site staff of participating in and running a large randomised trial within fertility (the endometrial scratch trial): a qualitative interview study
topic Reproductive Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34531221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051698
work_keys_str_mv AT chattersrobin experiencesoftrialparticipantsandsitestaffofparticipatinginandrunningalargerandomisedtrialwithinfertilitytheendometrialscratchtrialaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT whitedavid experiencesoftrialparticipantsandsitestaffofparticipatinginandrunningalargerandomisedtrialwithinfertilitytheendometrialscratchtrialaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT pyeclare experiencesoftrialparticipantsandsitestaffofparticipatinginandrunningalargerandomisedtrialwithinfertilitytheendometrialscratchtrialaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT petrovicana experiencesoftrialparticipantsandsitestaffofparticipatinginandrunningalargerandomisedtrialwithinfertilitytheendometrialscratchtrialaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT sizeranya experiencesoftrialparticipantsandsitestaffofparticipatinginandrunningalargerandomisedtrialwithinfertilitytheendometrialscratchtrialaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT kumarpavithra experiencesoftrialparticipantsandsitestaffofparticipatinginandrunningalargerandomisedtrialwithinfertilitytheendometrialscratchtrialaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT metwallymostafa experiencesoftrialparticipantsandsitestaffofparticipatinginandrunningalargerandomisedtrialwithinfertilitytheendometrialscratchtrialaqualitativeinterviewstudy