Cargando…
Stability prediction of early orthopedic treatment in Class III malocclusion: morphologic discriminant analysis
BACKGROUND: To evaluate morphologic differences between class III malocclusion success and failure treatment subjects in order to identify which variables are more predictive for long-term stability in early orthopedic treatment. In this retrospective study, 31 patients were enrolled from the Depart...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34541628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00379-z |
_version_ | 1784569586681643008 |
---|---|
author | Paoloni, V. De Razza, F. C. Franchi, L. Cozza, P. |
author_facet | Paoloni, V. De Razza, F. C. Franchi, L. Cozza, P. |
author_sort | Paoloni, V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate morphologic differences between class III malocclusion success and failure treatment subjects in order to identify which variables are more predictive for long-term stability in early orthopedic treatment. In this retrospective study, 31 patients were enrolled from the Department of Orthodontics (Rome Tor Vergata). Inclusion criteria were as follows: white ancestry, class III malocclusion, mixed dentition, cervical stage (CS) 1-2, no pseudo-class III. Pre-treatment radiographic and cast records were collected. Each patient underwent rapid maxillary expansion/facial mask/bite block (RME/FM/BB) orthopedic treatment until correction. At T1 (permanent dentition, CS4), records were recollected. According to treatment stability, relapse group (RG, 19) and success group (SG, 12) were identified. Sagittal and vertical cephalometric and digital cast measurements were performed. Student’s t tests were used for statistically significant differences inter and intra groups. For discriminant analysis, relapse or success status was added to each patient’s T0 data. RESULTS: At T0, RG showed larger upper anterior transversal width (p = 0.0266), while at T1 the upper anterior length was shorter than SG (p = 0.0028). Between T1 and T0, both groups showed larger upper anterior and posterior transversal widths. SG had greater upper anterior (p = 0.0066) and posterior (p = 0.449) sagittal length. RG presented larger lower anterior (p = 0.0012) and posterior (p = 0.0002) transversal widths, while there were no differences in SG lower arch. Discriminant analysis provided two predictive variables with an accuracy of 80.6%: upper anterior length and upper posterior length. CONCLUSION: A shorter and wider maxilla could be a predisposing factor for relapse and failure of the early orthopedic treatment of class III malocclusion patients. The absence of mandibular changes could be predictable for treatment success. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8450206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84502062021-10-01 Stability prediction of early orthopedic treatment in Class III malocclusion: morphologic discriminant analysis Paoloni, V. De Razza, F. C. Franchi, L. Cozza, P. Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate morphologic differences between class III malocclusion success and failure treatment subjects in order to identify which variables are more predictive for long-term stability in early orthopedic treatment. In this retrospective study, 31 patients were enrolled from the Department of Orthodontics (Rome Tor Vergata). Inclusion criteria were as follows: white ancestry, class III malocclusion, mixed dentition, cervical stage (CS) 1-2, no pseudo-class III. Pre-treatment radiographic and cast records were collected. Each patient underwent rapid maxillary expansion/facial mask/bite block (RME/FM/BB) orthopedic treatment until correction. At T1 (permanent dentition, CS4), records were recollected. According to treatment stability, relapse group (RG, 19) and success group (SG, 12) were identified. Sagittal and vertical cephalometric and digital cast measurements were performed. Student’s t tests were used for statistically significant differences inter and intra groups. For discriminant analysis, relapse or success status was added to each patient’s T0 data. RESULTS: At T0, RG showed larger upper anterior transversal width (p = 0.0266), while at T1 the upper anterior length was shorter than SG (p = 0.0028). Between T1 and T0, both groups showed larger upper anterior and posterior transversal widths. SG had greater upper anterior (p = 0.0066) and posterior (p = 0.449) sagittal length. RG presented larger lower anterior (p = 0.0012) and posterior (p = 0.0002) transversal widths, while there were no differences in SG lower arch. Discriminant analysis provided two predictive variables with an accuracy of 80.6%: upper anterior length and upper posterior length. CONCLUSION: A shorter and wider maxilla could be a predisposing factor for relapse and failure of the early orthopedic treatment of class III malocclusion patients. The absence of mandibular changes could be predictable for treatment success. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8450206/ /pubmed/34541628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00379-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Paoloni, V. De Razza, F. C. Franchi, L. Cozza, P. Stability prediction of early orthopedic treatment in Class III malocclusion: morphologic discriminant analysis |
title | Stability prediction of early orthopedic treatment in Class III malocclusion: morphologic discriminant analysis |
title_full | Stability prediction of early orthopedic treatment in Class III malocclusion: morphologic discriminant analysis |
title_fullStr | Stability prediction of early orthopedic treatment in Class III malocclusion: morphologic discriminant analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Stability prediction of early orthopedic treatment in Class III malocclusion: morphologic discriminant analysis |
title_short | Stability prediction of early orthopedic treatment in Class III malocclusion: morphologic discriminant analysis |
title_sort | stability prediction of early orthopedic treatment in class iii malocclusion: morphologic discriminant analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34541628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00379-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paoloniv stabilitypredictionofearlyorthopedictreatmentinclassiiimalocclusionmorphologicdiscriminantanalysis AT derazzafc stabilitypredictionofearlyorthopedictreatmentinclassiiimalocclusionmorphologicdiscriminantanalysis AT franchil stabilitypredictionofearlyorthopedictreatmentinclassiiimalocclusionmorphologicdiscriminantanalysis AT cozzap stabilitypredictionofearlyorthopedictreatmentinclassiiimalocclusionmorphologicdiscriminantanalysis |