Cargando…

Procedural Results and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for in-Stent Restenosis Chronic Total Occlusion Compared with de novo Chronic Total Occlusion

BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) chronic total occlusion (CTO) represents a challenging subgroup for revascularization of CTO by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There are limited data on the treatment and outcomes of PCI for ISR CTO. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the procedural resu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Guodong, Zheng, Naixin, Yang, Guojian, Li, Hui, Ai, Hu, Zhao, Ying, Sun, Fucheng, Zhang, Huiping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34552350
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S328332
_version_ 1784569607529431040
author Tang, Guodong
Zheng, Naixin
Yang, Guojian
Li, Hui
Ai, Hu
Zhao, Ying
Sun, Fucheng
Zhang, Huiping
author_facet Tang, Guodong
Zheng, Naixin
Yang, Guojian
Li, Hui
Ai, Hu
Zhao, Ying
Sun, Fucheng
Zhang, Huiping
author_sort Tang, Guodong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) chronic total occlusion (CTO) represents a challenging subgroup for revascularization of CTO by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There are limited data on the treatment and outcomes of PCI for ISR CTO. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the procedural results and 2-year outcomes of PCI for ISR CTO compared with de novo CTO. METHODS: Patients undergoing attempted CTO PCI between January 2017 and December 2019 were prospectively enrolled. We analyzed the procedural results and 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing ISR CTO and those undergoing de novo CTO PCI. RESULTS: A total of 426 patients undergoing 484 consecutive CTO PCI (ISR CTO PCI, n=84; de novo CTO, n=400) were enrolled during the study period. Patients undergoing de novo CTO PCI had a significantly greater syntax score than those undergoing ISR CTO PCI [23.0 (17.5, 30.5) vs 21.5 (14.5, 27.0), p=0.039]. Technical (73.8% vs 79.0%, p=0.296) and procedural (73.8% vs 78.0, p=0.405) success rates, as well as the incidence of major procedural complications (1.2% vs 2.3%, p=0.842), were comparable between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 20 months, patients who underwent ISR CTO PCI had a significantly higher incidence of MACE (33.3% vs 10.3%, p<0.001), mainly attributed to the higher TVR rates (24.7% vs 7.6%, p<0.001). ISR CTO was the only independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio, 4.124; 95% confidence interval, 1.951–8.717; p<0.001) during follow-up in patients who underwent CTO PCI. CONCLUSION: ISR CTO PCI shows comparable technical and procedural success, as well as major procedural complications compared with de novo CTO PCI. However, patients who underwent ISR CTO PCI had a significantly worse prognosis than those who underwent de novo CTO PCI, in terms of MACE, driven by TVR. ISR CTO was the only independent predictor of MACE during the follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8450285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84502852021-09-21 Procedural Results and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for in-Stent Restenosis Chronic Total Occlusion Compared with de novo Chronic Total Occlusion Tang, Guodong Zheng, Naixin Yang, Guojian Li, Hui Ai, Hu Zhao, Ying Sun, Fucheng Zhang, Huiping Int J Gen Med Original Research BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) chronic total occlusion (CTO) represents a challenging subgroup for revascularization of CTO by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There are limited data on the treatment and outcomes of PCI for ISR CTO. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the procedural results and 2-year outcomes of PCI for ISR CTO compared with de novo CTO. METHODS: Patients undergoing attempted CTO PCI between January 2017 and December 2019 were prospectively enrolled. We analyzed the procedural results and 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing ISR CTO and those undergoing de novo CTO PCI. RESULTS: A total of 426 patients undergoing 484 consecutive CTO PCI (ISR CTO PCI, n=84; de novo CTO, n=400) were enrolled during the study period. Patients undergoing de novo CTO PCI had a significantly greater syntax score than those undergoing ISR CTO PCI [23.0 (17.5, 30.5) vs 21.5 (14.5, 27.0), p=0.039]. Technical (73.8% vs 79.0%, p=0.296) and procedural (73.8% vs 78.0, p=0.405) success rates, as well as the incidence of major procedural complications (1.2% vs 2.3%, p=0.842), were comparable between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 20 months, patients who underwent ISR CTO PCI had a significantly higher incidence of MACE (33.3% vs 10.3%, p<0.001), mainly attributed to the higher TVR rates (24.7% vs 7.6%, p<0.001). ISR CTO was the only independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio, 4.124; 95% confidence interval, 1.951–8.717; p<0.001) during follow-up in patients who underwent CTO PCI. CONCLUSION: ISR CTO PCI shows comparable technical and procedural success, as well as major procedural complications compared with de novo CTO PCI. However, patients who underwent ISR CTO PCI had a significantly worse prognosis than those who underwent de novo CTO PCI, in terms of MACE, driven by TVR. ISR CTO was the only independent predictor of MACE during the follow-up. Dove 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8450285/ /pubmed/34552350 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S328332 Text en © 2021 Tang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Tang, Guodong
Zheng, Naixin
Yang, Guojian
Li, Hui
Ai, Hu
Zhao, Ying
Sun, Fucheng
Zhang, Huiping
Procedural Results and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for in-Stent Restenosis Chronic Total Occlusion Compared with de novo Chronic Total Occlusion
title Procedural Results and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for in-Stent Restenosis Chronic Total Occlusion Compared with de novo Chronic Total Occlusion
title_full Procedural Results and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for in-Stent Restenosis Chronic Total Occlusion Compared with de novo Chronic Total Occlusion
title_fullStr Procedural Results and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for in-Stent Restenosis Chronic Total Occlusion Compared with de novo Chronic Total Occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Procedural Results and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for in-Stent Restenosis Chronic Total Occlusion Compared with de novo Chronic Total Occlusion
title_short Procedural Results and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for in-Stent Restenosis Chronic Total Occlusion Compared with de novo Chronic Total Occlusion
title_sort procedural results and long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis chronic total occlusion compared with de novo chronic total occlusion
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34552350
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S328332
work_keys_str_mv AT tangguodong proceduralresultsandlongtermoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforinstentrestenosischronictotalocclusioncomparedwithdenovochronictotalocclusion
AT zhengnaixin proceduralresultsandlongtermoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforinstentrestenosischronictotalocclusioncomparedwithdenovochronictotalocclusion
AT yangguojian proceduralresultsandlongtermoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforinstentrestenosischronictotalocclusioncomparedwithdenovochronictotalocclusion
AT lihui proceduralresultsandlongtermoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforinstentrestenosischronictotalocclusioncomparedwithdenovochronictotalocclusion
AT aihu proceduralresultsandlongtermoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforinstentrestenosischronictotalocclusioncomparedwithdenovochronictotalocclusion
AT zhaoying proceduralresultsandlongtermoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforinstentrestenosischronictotalocclusioncomparedwithdenovochronictotalocclusion
AT sunfucheng proceduralresultsandlongtermoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforinstentrestenosischronictotalocclusioncomparedwithdenovochronictotalocclusion
AT zhanghuiping proceduralresultsandlongtermoutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforinstentrestenosischronictotalocclusioncomparedwithdenovochronictotalocclusion