Cargando…

Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials

The aim of this study was to summarise the clinical evidence supporting almost 40 years of topical cadexomer iodine (CIOD) use in wound bed preparation by removing barriers to healing such as exudate, slough, bioburden, and infection and allowing chronic wound progression. A systematic review was co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woo, Kevin, Dowsett, Caroline, Costa, Ben, Ebohon, Stephen, Woodmansey, Emma J., Malone, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13560
_version_ 1784569721695240192
author Woo, Kevin
Dowsett, Caroline
Costa, Ben
Ebohon, Stephen
Woodmansey, Emma J.
Malone, Matthew
author_facet Woo, Kevin
Dowsett, Caroline
Costa, Ben
Ebohon, Stephen
Woodmansey, Emma J.
Malone, Matthew
author_sort Woo, Kevin
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to summarise the clinical evidence supporting almost 40 years of topical cadexomer iodine (CIOD) use in wound bed preparation by removing barriers to healing such as exudate, slough, bioburden, and infection and allowing chronic wound progression. A systematic review was conducted (Embase/PubMed, November 2020) to identify relevant comparative studies meeting inclusion criteria. Meta‐analyses were performed using a fixed‐effects (I (2) < 50%) or random‐effects model (I (2) ≥ 50%) depending on statistical heterogeneity. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals. In total, 436 publications were identified of which 13 were comparative trials including outcomes of interest. Significant reductions in exudate, pus/debris, slough, bioburden, and infection were reported in chronic wounds treated with CIOD, compared with standard of care (SOC). Meta‐analyses highlighted the positive impact of CIOD on mean wound area reduction (MD = 2.35 cm(2), 95% CI = 0.34–4.36, P = .0219) after eight weeks treatment and overall wound healing events compared to SOC; wounds including venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, and pressure ulcers treated with CIOD were more than twice as likely to heal than those receiving SOC (RR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.54–3.45, P < .0001). This meta‐analysis demonstrates the efficacy of CIOD on chronic wounds through removal of barriers to healing. CIOD should be considered in wound bed preparation and treatment protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8450789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84507892021-09-27 Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials Woo, Kevin Dowsett, Caroline Costa, Ben Ebohon, Stephen Woodmansey, Emma J. Malone, Matthew Int Wound J Original Articles The aim of this study was to summarise the clinical evidence supporting almost 40 years of topical cadexomer iodine (CIOD) use in wound bed preparation by removing barriers to healing such as exudate, slough, bioburden, and infection and allowing chronic wound progression. A systematic review was conducted (Embase/PubMed, November 2020) to identify relevant comparative studies meeting inclusion criteria. Meta‐analyses were performed using a fixed‐effects (I (2) < 50%) or random‐effects model (I (2) ≥ 50%) depending on statistical heterogeneity. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals. In total, 436 publications were identified of which 13 were comparative trials including outcomes of interest. Significant reductions in exudate, pus/debris, slough, bioburden, and infection were reported in chronic wounds treated with CIOD, compared with standard of care (SOC). Meta‐analyses highlighted the positive impact of CIOD on mean wound area reduction (MD = 2.35 cm(2), 95% CI = 0.34–4.36, P = .0219) after eight weeks treatment and overall wound healing events compared to SOC; wounds including venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, and pressure ulcers treated with CIOD were more than twice as likely to heal than those receiving SOC (RR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.54–3.45, P < .0001). This meta‐analysis demonstrates the efficacy of CIOD on chronic wounds through removal of barriers to healing. CIOD should be considered in wound bed preparation and treatment protocols. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8450789/ /pubmed/33559332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13560 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Woo, Kevin
Dowsett, Caroline
Costa, Ben
Ebohon, Stephen
Woodmansey, Emma J.
Malone, Matthew
Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials
title Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials
title_full Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials
title_fullStr Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials
title_short Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials
title_sort efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13560
work_keys_str_mv AT wookevin efficacyoftopicalcadexomeriodinetreatmentinchronicwoundssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativeclinicaltrials
AT dowsettcaroline efficacyoftopicalcadexomeriodinetreatmentinchronicwoundssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativeclinicaltrials
AT costaben efficacyoftopicalcadexomeriodinetreatmentinchronicwoundssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativeclinicaltrials
AT ebohonstephen efficacyoftopicalcadexomeriodinetreatmentinchronicwoundssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativeclinicaltrials
AT woodmanseyemmaj efficacyoftopicalcadexomeriodinetreatmentinchronicwoundssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativeclinicaltrials
AT malonematthew efficacyoftopicalcadexomeriodinetreatmentinchronicwoundssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativeclinicaltrials