Cargando…
Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials
The aim of this study was to summarise the clinical evidence supporting almost 40 years of topical cadexomer iodine (CIOD) use in wound bed preparation by removing barriers to healing such as exudate, slough, bioburden, and infection and allowing chronic wound progression. A systematic review was co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13560 |
_version_ | 1784569721695240192 |
---|---|
author | Woo, Kevin Dowsett, Caroline Costa, Ben Ebohon, Stephen Woodmansey, Emma J. Malone, Matthew |
author_facet | Woo, Kevin Dowsett, Caroline Costa, Ben Ebohon, Stephen Woodmansey, Emma J. Malone, Matthew |
author_sort | Woo, Kevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to summarise the clinical evidence supporting almost 40 years of topical cadexomer iodine (CIOD) use in wound bed preparation by removing barriers to healing such as exudate, slough, bioburden, and infection and allowing chronic wound progression. A systematic review was conducted (Embase/PubMed, November 2020) to identify relevant comparative studies meeting inclusion criteria. Meta‐analyses were performed using a fixed‐effects (I (2) < 50%) or random‐effects model (I (2) ≥ 50%) depending on statistical heterogeneity. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals. In total, 436 publications were identified of which 13 were comparative trials including outcomes of interest. Significant reductions in exudate, pus/debris, slough, bioburden, and infection were reported in chronic wounds treated with CIOD, compared with standard of care (SOC). Meta‐analyses highlighted the positive impact of CIOD on mean wound area reduction (MD = 2.35 cm(2), 95% CI = 0.34–4.36, P = .0219) after eight weeks treatment and overall wound healing events compared to SOC; wounds including venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, and pressure ulcers treated with CIOD were more than twice as likely to heal than those receiving SOC (RR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.54–3.45, P < .0001). This meta‐analysis demonstrates the efficacy of CIOD on chronic wounds through removal of barriers to healing. CIOD should be considered in wound bed preparation and treatment protocols. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8450789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84507892021-09-27 Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials Woo, Kevin Dowsett, Caroline Costa, Ben Ebohon, Stephen Woodmansey, Emma J. Malone, Matthew Int Wound J Original Articles The aim of this study was to summarise the clinical evidence supporting almost 40 years of topical cadexomer iodine (CIOD) use in wound bed preparation by removing barriers to healing such as exudate, slough, bioburden, and infection and allowing chronic wound progression. A systematic review was conducted (Embase/PubMed, November 2020) to identify relevant comparative studies meeting inclusion criteria. Meta‐analyses were performed using a fixed‐effects (I (2) < 50%) or random‐effects model (I (2) ≥ 50%) depending on statistical heterogeneity. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals. In total, 436 publications were identified of which 13 were comparative trials including outcomes of interest. Significant reductions in exudate, pus/debris, slough, bioburden, and infection were reported in chronic wounds treated with CIOD, compared with standard of care (SOC). Meta‐analyses highlighted the positive impact of CIOD on mean wound area reduction (MD = 2.35 cm(2), 95% CI = 0.34–4.36, P = .0219) after eight weeks treatment and overall wound healing events compared to SOC; wounds including venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, and pressure ulcers treated with CIOD were more than twice as likely to heal than those receiving SOC (RR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.54–3.45, P < .0001). This meta‐analysis demonstrates the efficacy of CIOD on chronic wounds through removal of barriers to healing. CIOD should be considered in wound bed preparation and treatment protocols. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8450789/ /pubmed/33559332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13560 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Woo, Kevin Dowsett, Caroline Costa, Ben Ebohon, Stephen Woodmansey, Emma J. Malone, Matthew Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials |
title | Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials |
title_full | Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials |
title_short | Efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials |
title_sort | efficacy of topical cadexomer iodine treatment in chronic wounds: systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative clinical trials |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13560 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wookevin efficacyoftopicalcadexomeriodinetreatmentinchronicwoundssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativeclinicaltrials AT dowsettcaroline efficacyoftopicalcadexomeriodinetreatmentinchronicwoundssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativeclinicaltrials AT costaben efficacyoftopicalcadexomeriodinetreatmentinchronicwoundssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativeclinicaltrials AT ebohonstephen efficacyoftopicalcadexomeriodinetreatmentinchronicwoundssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativeclinicaltrials AT woodmanseyemmaj efficacyoftopicalcadexomeriodinetreatmentinchronicwoundssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativeclinicaltrials AT malonematthew efficacyoftopicalcadexomeriodinetreatmentinchronicwoundssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcomparativeclinicaltrials |