Cargando…

Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research

In skin and wound research the instrumental measurement of skin function is established. Despite the widespread use, empirical evidence about measurement errors is widely lacking. The aim of this study was to measure reliability and agreement of skin temperature, transepidermal water loss, epidermal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kottner, Jan, Blume‐Peytavi, Ulrike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13574
_version_ 1784569722959822848
author Kottner, Jan
Blume‐Peytavi, Ulrike
author_facet Kottner, Jan
Blume‐Peytavi, Ulrike
author_sort Kottner, Jan
collection PubMed
description In skin and wound research the instrumental measurement of skin function is established. Despite the widespread use, empirical evidence about measurement errors is widely lacking. The aim of this study was to measure reliability and agreement of skin temperature, transepidermal water loss, epidermal hydration, and erythema at the heel and sacral skin. Four experienced researchers performed skin measurements in 15 subjects. Lowest reliability was observed for transepidermal water loss at the sacral skin (ICC (1) 0.46 (95% CI 0.00‐0.78)) and highest for skin temperature at the heel skin (ICC (1) 0.99 (95% CI 0.99‐1.00)). Lowest Standard Errors of Measurement were calculated for skin temperature measurements at the heels (0.11°C) and highest for erythema measurements at the sacral skin (26.7 arbitrary units). There was a clear association between variability of estimates and reliability coefficients. Single measurements of skin temperature, stratum corneum, and epidermal hydration at the sacral and heel skin areas can be used in clinical research and practice. Means of at least two measurements should be used for estimating transepidermal water loss and erythema. Evidence is needed to inform researchers about relative and absolute measurement errors of commonly applied instruments and measurements in skin and wound research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8450794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84507942021-09-27 Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research Kottner, Jan Blume‐Peytavi, Ulrike Int Wound J Original Articles In skin and wound research the instrumental measurement of skin function is established. Despite the widespread use, empirical evidence about measurement errors is widely lacking. The aim of this study was to measure reliability and agreement of skin temperature, transepidermal water loss, epidermal hydration, and erythema at the heel and sacral skin. Four experienced researchers performed skin measurements in 15 subjects. Lowest reliability was observed for transepidermal water loss at the sacral skin (ICC (1) 0.46 (95% CI 0.00‐0.78)) and highest for skin temperature at the heel skin (ICC (1) 0.99 (95% CI 0.99‐1.00)). Lowest Standard Errors of Measurement were calculated for skin temperature measurements at the heels (0.11°C) and highest for erythema measurements at the sacral skin (26.7 arbitrary units). There was a clear association between variability of estimates and reliability coefficients. Single measurements of skin temperature, stratum corneum, and epidermal hydration at the sacral and heel skin areas can be used in clinical research and practice. Means of at least two measurements should be used for estimating transepidermal water loss and erythema. Evidence is needed to inform researchers about relative and absolute measurement errors of commonly applied instruments and measurements in skin and wound research. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8450794/ /pubmed/33626239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13574 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kottner, Jan
Blume‐Peytavi, Ulrike
Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research
title Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research
title_full Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research
title_fullStr Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research
title_short Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research
title_sort reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13574
work_keys_str_mv AT kottnerjan reliabilityandagreementofinstrumentalskinbarriermeasurementsinclinicalpressureulcerpreventionresearch
AT blumepeytaviulrike reliabilityandagreementofinstrumentalskinbarriermeasurementsinclinicalpressureulcerpreventionresearch