Cargando…
Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research
In skin and wound research the instrumental measurement of skin function is established. Despite the widespread use, empirical evidence about measurement errors is widely lacking. The aim of this study was to measure reliability and agreement of skin temperature, transepidermal water loss, epidermal...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13574 |
_version_ | 1784569722959822848 |
---|---|
author | Kottner, Jan Blume‐Peytavi, Ulrike |
author_facet | Kottner, Jan Blume‐Peytavi, Ulrike |
author_sort | Kottner, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | In skin and wound research the instrumental measurement of skin function is established. Despite the widespread use, empirical evidence about measurement errors is widely lacking. The aim of this study was to measure reliability and agreement of skin temperature, transepidermal water loss, epidermal hydration, and erythema at the heel and sacral skin. Four experienced researchers performed skin measurements in 15 subjects. Lowest reliability was observed for transepidermal water loss at the sacral skin (ICC (1) 0.46 (95% CI 0.00‐0.78)) and highest for skin temperature at the heel skin (ICC (1) 0.99 (95% CI 0.99‐1.00)). Lowest Standard Errors of Measurement were calculated for skin temperature measurements at the heels (0.11°C) and highest for erythema measurements at the sacral skin (26.7 arbitrary units). There was a clear association between variability of estimates and reliability coefficients. Single measurements of skin temperature, stratum corneum, and epidermal hydration at the sacral and heel skin areas can be used in clinical research and practice. Means of at least two measurements should be used for estimating transepidermal water loss and erythema. Evidence is needed to inform researchers about relative and absolute measurement errors of commonly applied instruments and measurements in skin and wound research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8450794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84507942021-09-27 Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research Kottner, Jan Blume‐Peytavi, Ulrike Int Wound J Original Articles In skin and wound research the instrumental measurement of skin function is established. Despite the widespread use, empirical evidence about measurement errors is widely lacking. The aim of this study was to measure reliability and agreement of skin temperature, transepidermal water loss, epidermal hydration, and erythema at the heel and sacral skin. Four experienced researchers performed skin measurements in 15 subjects. Lowest reliability was observed for transepidermal water loss at the sacral skin (ICC (1) 0.46 (95% CI 0.00‐0.78)) and highest for skin temperature at the heel skin (ICC (1) 0.99 (95% CI 0.99‐1.00)). Lowest Standard Errors of Measurement were calculated for skin temperature measurements at the heels (0.11°C) and highest for erythema measurements at the sacral skin (26.7 arbitrary units). There was a clear association between variability of estimates and reliability coefficients. Single measurements of skin temperature, stratum corneum, and epidermal hydration at the sacral and heel skin areas can be used in clinical research and practice. Means of at least two measurements should be used for estimating transepidermal water loss and erythema. Evidence is needed to inform researchers about relative and absolute measurement errors of commonly applied instruments and measurements in skin and wound research. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8450794/ /pubmed/33626239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13574 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kottner, Jan Blume‐Peytavi, Ulrike Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research |
title | Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research |
title_full | Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research |
title_fullStr | Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research |
title_short | Reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research |
title_sort | reliability and agreement of instrumental skin barrier measurements in clinical pressure ulcer prevention research |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13574 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kottnerjan reliabilityandagreementofinstrumentalskinbarriermeasurementsinclinicalpressureulcerpreventionresearch AT blumepeytaviulrike reliabilityandagreementofinstrumentalskinbarriermeasurementsinclinicalpressureulcerpreventionresearch |