Cargando…

Detection of bacterial fluorescence from in vivo wound biofilms using a point‐of‐care fluorescence imaging device

Wound biofilms must be identified to target disruption and bacterial eradication but are challenging to detect with standard clinical assessment. This study tested whether bacterial fluorescence imaging could detect porphyrin‐producing bacteria within a biofilm using well‐established in vivo models....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopez, Andrea J., Jones, Laura M., Reynolds, Landrye, Diaz, Rachel C., George, Isaiah K., Little, William, Fleming, Derek, D'souza, Anna, Rennie, Monique Y., Rumbaugh, Kendra P., Smith, Allie Clinton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33565263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13564
_version_ 1784569724235939840
author Lopez, Andrea J.
Jones, Laura M.
Reynolds, Landrye
Diaz, Rachel C.
George, Isaiah K.
Little, William
Fleming, Derek
D'souza, Anna
Rennie, Monique Y.
Rumbaugh, Kendra P.
Smith, Allie Clinton
author_facet Lopez, Andrea J.
Jones, Laura M.
Reynolds, Landrye
Diaz, Rachel C.
George, Isaiah K.
Little, William
Fleming, Derek
D'souza, Anna
Rennie, Monique Y.
Rumbaugh, Kendra P.
Smith, Allie Clinton
author_sort Lopez, Andrea J.
collection PubMed
description Wound biofilms must be identified to target disruption and bacterial eradication but are challenging to detect with standard clinical assessment. This study tested whether bacterial fluorescence imaging could detect porphyrin‐producing bacteria within a biofilm using well‐established in vivo models. Mouse wounds were inoculated on Day 0 with planktonic bacteria (n = 39, porphyrin‐producing and non‐porphyrin‐producing species, 10(7) colony forming units (CFU)/wound) or with polymicrobial biofilms (n = 16, 3 biofilms per mouse, each with 1:1:1 parts Staphylococcus aureus/Escherichia coli/Enterobacter cloacae, 10(7) CFU/biofilm) that were grown in vitro. Mouse wounds inoculated with biofilm underwent fluorescence imaging up to Day 4 or 5. Wounds were then excised and sent for microbiological analysis. Bacteria‐matrix interaction was assessed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and histopathology. A total of 48 hours after inoculation with planktonic bacteria or biofilm, red fluorescence was readily detected in wounds; red fluorescence intensified up to Day 4. Red fluorescence from biofilms persisted in excised wound tissue post‐wash. SEM and histopathology confirmed bacteria‐matrix interaction. This pre‐clinical study is the first to demonstrate the fluorescence detection of bacterial biofilm in vivo using a point‐of‐care wound imaging device. These findings have implications for clinicians targeting biofilm and may facilitate improved visualisation and removal of biofilms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8450799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84507992021-09-27 Detection of bacterial fluorescence from in vivo wound biofilms using a point‐of‐care fluorescence imaging device Lopez, Andrea J. Jones, Laura M. Reynolds, Landrye Diaz, Rachel C. George, Isaiah K. Little, William Fleming, Derek D'souza, Anna Rennie, Monique Y. Rumbaugh, Kendra P. Smith, Allie Clinton Int Wound J Original Articles Wound biofilms must be identified to target disruption and bacterial eradication but are challenging to detect with standard clinical assessment. This study tested whether bacterial fluorescence imaging could detect porphyrin‐producing bacteria within a biofilm using well‐established in vivo models. Mouse wounds were inoculated on Day 0 with planktonic bacteria (n = 39, porphyrin‐producing and non‐porphyrin‐producing species, 10(7) colony forming units (CFU)/wound) or with polymicrobial biofilms (n = 16, 3 biofilms per mouse, each with 1:1:1 parts Staphylococcus aureus/Escherichia coli/Enterobacter cloacae, 10(7) CFU/biofilm) that were grown in vitro. Mouse wounds inoculated with biofilm underwent fluorescence imaging up to Day 4 or 5. Wounds were then excised and sent for microbiological analysis. Bacteria‐matrix interaction was assessed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and histopathology. A total of 48 hours after inoculation with planktonic bacteria or biofilm, red fluorescence was readily detected in wounds; red fluorescence intensified up to Day 4. Red fluorescence from biofilms persisted in excised wound tissue post‐wash. SEM and histopathology confirmed bacteria‐matrix interaction. This pre‐clinical study is the first to demonstrate the fluorescence detection of bacterial biofilm in vivo using a point‐of‐care wound imaging device. These findings have implications for clinicians targeting biofilm and may facilitate improved visualisation and removal of biofilms. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8450799/ /pubmed/33565263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13564 Text en © 2021 MolecuLight, Inc. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lopez, Andrea J.
Jones, Laura M.
Reynolds, Landrye
Diaz, Rachel C.
George, Isaiah K.
Little, William
Fleming, Derek
D'souza, Anna
Rennie, Monique Y.
Rumbaugh, Kendra P.
Smith, Allie Clinton
Detection of bacterial fluorescence from in vivo wound biofilms using a point‐of‐care fluorescence imaging device
title Detection of bacterial fluorescence from in vivo wound biofilms using a point‐of‐care fluorescence imaging device
title_full Detection of bacterial fluorescence from in vivo wound biofilms using a point‐of‐care fluorescence imaging device
title_fullStr Detection of bacterial fluorescence from in vivo wound biofilms using a point‐of‐care fluorescence imaging device
title_full_unstemmed Detection of bacterial fluorescence from in vivo wound biofilms using a point‐of‐care fluorescence imaging device
title_short Detection of bacterial fluorescence from in vivo wound biofilms using a point‐of‐care fluorescence imaging device
title_sort detection of bacterial fluorescence from in vivo wound biofilms using a point‐of‐care fluorescence imaging device
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33565263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13564
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezandreaj detectionofbacterialfluorescencefrominvivowoundbiofilmsusingapointofcarefluorescenceimagingdevice
AT joneslauram detectionofbacterialfluorescencefrominvivowoundbiofilmsusingapointofcarefluorescenceimagingdevice
AT reynoldslandrye detectionofbacterialfluorescencefrominvivowoundbiofilmsusingapointofcarefluorescenceimagingdevice
AT diazrachelc detectionofbacterialfluorescencefrominvivowoundbiofilmsusingapointofcarefluorescenceimagingdevice
AT georgeisaiahk detectionofbacterialfluorescencefrominvivowoundbiofilmsusingapointofcarefluorescenceimagingdevice
AT littlewilliam detectionofbacterialfluorescencefrominvivowoundbiofilmsusingapointofcarefluorescenceimagingdevice
AT flemingderek detectionofbacterialfluorescencefrominvivowoundbiofilmsusingapointofcarefluorescenceimagingdevice
AT dsouzaanna detectionofbacterialfluorescencefrominvivowoundbiofilmsusingapointofcarefluorescenceimagingdevice
AT renniemoniquey detectionofbacterialfluorescencefrominvivowoundbiofilmsusingapointofcarefluorescenceimagingdevice
AT rumbaughkendrap detectionofbacterialfluorescencefrominvivowoundbiofilmsusingapointofcarefluorescenceimagingdevice
AT smithallieclinton detectionofbacterialfluorescencefrominvivowoundbiofilmsusingapointofcarefluorescenceimagingdevice