Cargando…

A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland

BACKGROUND: Health equity differs from the concept of health inequality by taking into consideration the fairness of an inequality. Inequities may be culturally specific, based on social relations within a society. Measuring these inequities often requires grouping individuals. These groupings can b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carroll, Christopher, Evans, Katie, Elmusharaf, Khalifa, O’Donnell, Patrick, Dee, Anne, O’Donovan, Diarmuid, Casey, Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34538235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11717-5
_version_ 1784569782006185984
author Carroll, Christopher
Evans, Katie
Elmusharaf, Khalifa
O’Donnell, Patrick
Dee, Anne
O’Donovan, Diarmuid
Casey, Marie
author_facet Carroll, Christopher
Evans, Katie
Elmusharaf, Khalifa
O’Donnell, Patrick
Dee, Anne
O’Donovan, Diarmuid
Casey, Marie
author_sort Carroll, Christopher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health equity differs from the concept of health inequality by taking into consideration the fairness of an inequality. Inequities may be culturally specific, based on social relations within a society. Measuring these inequities often requires grouping individuals. These groupings can be termed equity stratifiers. The most common groupings affected by health inequalities are summarised by the acronym PROGRESS (Place of residence, Race, Occupation, Gender, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, Social capital). The aim of this review was to examine the use of equity stratifiers in routinely collected health and social care data collections in Ireland. METHODS: One hundred and twenty data collections were identified from the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) document, “Catalogue of national health and social care data collections: Version 3.0”. Managers of all the data collections included were contacted and a data dictionary was requested where one was not available via the HIQA website. Each of the data dictionaries available was reviewed to identify the equity stratifiers recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-three of the 120 data collections were considered eligible to be included for review. Twenty-nine data dictionaries were made available. There was neither a data dictionary available nor a response to our query from data collection managers for twenty-three (27.7%) of the data collections eligible for inclusion. Data dictionaries were from national data collections, regional data collections and national surveys. All data dictionaries contained at least one of the PROGRESS equity stratifiers. National surveys included more equity stratifiers compared with national and regional data collections. Definitions used for recording social groups for the stratifiers examined lacked consistency. CONCLUSIONS: While there has been much discussion on tackling health inequalities in Ireland in recent years, health and social care data collections do not always record the social groupings that are most commonly affected. In order to address this, it is necessary to consider which equity stratifiers should be used for the Irish population and, subsequently, for agreed stratifiers to be incorporated into routine health data collection. These are lessons that can be shared internationally as other countries begin to address deficits in their use of equity stratifiers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8451151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84511512021-09-20 A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland Carroll, Christopher Evans, Katie Elmusharaf, Khalifa O’Donnell, Patrick Dee, Anne O’Donovan, Diarmuid Casey, Marie BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Health equity differs from the concept of health inequality by taking into consideration the fairness of an inequality. Inequities may be culturally specific, based on social relations within a society. Measuring these inequities often requires grouping individuals. These groupings can be termed equity stratifiers. The most common groupings affected by health inequalities are summarised by the acronym PROGRESS (Place of residence, Race, Occupation, Gender, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, Social capital). The aim of this review was to examine the use of equity stratifiers in routinely collected health and social care data collections in Ireland. METHODS: One hundred and twenty data collections were identified from the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) document, “Catalogue of national health and social care data collections: Version 3.0”. Managers of all the data collections included were contacted and a data dictionary was requested where one was not available via the HIQA website. Each of the data dictionaries available was reviewed to identify the equity stratifiers recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-three of the 120 data collections were considered eligible to be included for review. Twenty-nine data dictionaries were made available. There was neither a data dictionary available nor a response to our query from data collection managers for twenty-three (27.7%) of the data collections eligible for inclusion. Data dictionaries were from national data collections, regional data collections and national surveys. All data dictionaries contained at least one of the PROGRESS equity stratifiers. National surveys included more equity stratifiers compared with national and regional data collections. Definitions used for recording social groups for the stratifiers examined lacked consistency. CONCLUSIONS: While there has been much discussion on tackling health inequalities in Ireland in recent years, health and social care data collections do not always record the social groupings that are most commonly affected. In order to address this, it is necessary to consider which equity stratifiers should be used for the Irish population and, subsequently, for agreed stratifiers to be incorporated into routine health data collection. These are lessons that can be shared internationally as other countries begin to address deficits in their use of equity stratifiers. BioMed Central 2021-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8451151/ /pubmed/34538235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11717-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Carroll, Christopher
Evans, Katie
Elmusharaf, Khalifa
O’Donnell, Patrick
Dee, Anne
O’Donovan, Diarmuid
Casey, Marie
A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland
title A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland
title_full A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland
title_fullStr A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland
title_full_unstemmed A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland
title_short A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland
title_sort review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in ireland
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34538235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11717-5
work_keys_str_mv AT carrollchristopher areviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland
AT evanskatie areviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland
AT elmusharafkhalifa areviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland
AT odonnellpatrick areviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland
AT deeanne areviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland
AT odonovandiarmuid areviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland
AT caseymarie areviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland
AT carrollchristopher reviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland
AT evanskatie reviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland
AT elmusharafkhalifa reviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland
AT odonnellpatrick reviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland
AT deeanne reviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland
AT odonovandiarmuid reviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland
AT caseymarie reviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland