Cargando…
A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland
BACKGROUND: Health equity differs from the concept of health inequality by taking into consideration the fairness of an inequality. Inequities may be culturally specific, based on social relations within a society. Measuring these inequities often requires grouping individuals. These groupings can b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34538235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11717-5 |
_version_ | 1784569782006185984 |
---|---|
author | Carroll, Christopher Evans, Katie Elmusharaf, Khalifa O’Donnell, Patrick Dee, Anne O’Donovan, Diarmuid Casey, Marie |
author_facet | Carroll, Christopher Evans, Katie Elmusharaf, Khalifa O’Donnell, Patrick Dee, Anne O’Donovan, Diarmuid Casey, Marie |
author_sort | Carroll, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health equity differs from the concept of health inequality by taking into consideration the fairness of an inequality. Inequities may be culturally specific, based on social relations within a society. Measuring these inequities often requires grouping individuals. These groupings can be termed equity stratifiers. The most common groupings affected by health inequalities are summarised by the acronym PROGRESS (Place of residence, Race, Occupation, Gender, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, Social capital). The aim of this review was to examine the use of equity stratifiers in routinely collected health and social care data collections in Ireland. METHODS: One hundred and twenty data collections were identified from the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) document, “Catalogue of national health and social care data collections: Version 3.0”. Managers of all the data collections included were contacted and a data dictionary was requested where one was not available via the HIQA website. Each of the data dictionaries available was reviewed to identify the equity stratifiers recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-three of the 120 data collections were considered eligible to be included for review. Twenty-nine data dictionaries were made available. There was neither a data dictionary available nor a response to our query from data collection managers for twenty-three (27.7%) of the data collections eligible for inclusion. Data dictionaries were from national data collections, regional data collections and national surveys. All data dictionaries contained at least one of the PROGRESS equity stratifiers. National surveys included more equity stratifiers compared with national and regional data collections. Definitions used for recording social groups for the stratifiers examined lacked consistency. CONCLUSIONS: While there has been much discussion on tackling health inequalities in Ireland in recent years, health and social care data collections do not always record the social groupings that are most commonly affected. In order to address this, it is necessary to consider which equity stratifiers should be used for the Irish population and, subsequently, for agreed stratifiers to be incorporated into routine health data collection. These are lessons that can be shared internationally as other countries begin to address deficits in their use of equity stratifiers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8451151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84511512021-09-20 A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland Carroll, Christopher Evans, Katie Elmusharaf, Khalifa O’Donnell, Patrick Dee, Anne O’Donovan, Diarmuid Casey, Marie BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Health equity differs from the concept of health inequality by taking into consideration the fairness of an inequality. Inequities may be culturally specific, based on social relations within a society. Measuring these inequities often requires grouping individuals. These groupings can be termed equity stratifiers. The most common groupings affected by health inequalities are summarised by the acronym PROGRESS (Place of residence, Race, Occupation, Gender, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, Social capital). The aim of this review was to examine the use of equity stratifiers in routinely collected health and social care data collections in Ireland. METHODS: One hundred and twenty data collections were identified from the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) document, “Catalogue of national health and social care data collections: Version 3.0”. Managers of all the data collections included were contacted and a data dictionary was requested where one was not available via the HIQA website. Each of the data dictionaries available was reviewed to identify the equity stratifiers recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-three of the 120 data collections were considered eligible to be included for review. Twenty-nine data dictionaries were made available. There was neither a data dictionary available nor a response to our query from data collection managers for twenty-three (27.7%) of the data collections eligible for inclusion. Data dictionaries were from national data collections, regional data collections and national surveys. All data dictionaries contained at least one of the PROGRESS equity stratifiers. National surveys included more equity stratifiers compared with national and regional data collections. Definitions used for recording social groups for the stratifiers examined lacked consistency. CONCLUSIONS: While there has been much discussion on tackling health inequalities in Ireland in recent years, health and social care data collections do not always record the social groupings that are most commonly affected. In order to address this, it is necessary to consider which equity stratifiers should be used for the Irish population and, subsequently, for agreed stratifiers to be incorporated into routine health data collection. These are lessons that can be shared internationally as other countries begin to address deficits in their use of equity stratifiers. BioMed Central 2021-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8451151/ /pubmed/34538235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11717-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Carroll, Christopher Evans, Katie Elmusharaf, Khalifa O’Donnell, Patrick Dee, Anne O’Donovan, Diarmuid Casey, Marie A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland |
title | A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland |
title_full | A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland |
title_fullStr | A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland |
title_short | A review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in Ireland |
title_sort | review of the inclusion of equity stratifiers for the measurement of health inequalities within health and social care data collections in ireland |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34538235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11717-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carrollchristopher areviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland AT evanskatie areviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland AT elmusharafkhalifa areviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland AT odonnellpatrick areviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland AT deeanne areviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland AT odonovandiarmuid areviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland AT caseymarie areviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland AT carrollchristopher reviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland AT evanskatie reviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland AT elmusharafkhalifa reviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland AT odonnellpatrick reviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland AT deeanne reviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland AT odonovandiarmuid reviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland AT caseymarie reviewoftheinclusionofequitystratifiersforthemeasurementofhealthinequalitieswithinhealthandsocialcaredatacollectionsinireland |