Cargando…

PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study

INTRODUCTION: The traditional double blind RCT is the ‘gold standard’ trial design. For a variety of reasons, these designs often fail to accrue enough participants to conclude. This is particularly challenging in localized prostate cancer. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) tri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bass, E.J., Klimowska-Nassar, N., Sasikaran, T., Day, E., Fiorentino, F., Sydes, M.R., Winkler, M., Arumainayagam, N., Khoubehi, B., Pope, A., Sokhi, H., Dudderidge, T., Ahmed, H.U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34139356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106485
_version_ 1784569806674984960
author Bass, E.J.
Klimowska-Nassar, N.
Sasikaran, T.
Day, E.
Fiorentino, F.
Sydes, M.R.
Winkler, M.
Arumainayagam, N.
Khoubehi, B.
Pope, A.
Sokhi, H.
Dudderidge, T.
Ahmed, H.U.
author_facet Bass, E.J.
Klimowska-Nassar, N.
Sasikaran, T.
Day, E.
Fiorentino, F.
Sydes, M.R.
Winkler, M.
Arumainayagam, N.
Khoubehi, B.
Pope, A.
Sokhi, H.
Dudderidge, T.
Ahmed, H.U.
author_sort Bass, E.J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The traditional double blind RCT is the ‘gold standard’ trial design. For a variety of reasons, these designs often fail to accrue enough participants to conclude. This is particularly challenging in localized prostate cancer. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) trial design may represent an alternative approach to delivering robust comparative data in prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IP3-PROSPECT is a cmRCT designed to test multiple prostate cancer interventions from eligible men in one cohort. Key to the design is two points of consent. First, at point of consent one, men referred for prostate cancer investigations are invited to join the cohort. They may then be randomly invited at a later date to consider an intervention at point of consent two. In the pilot phase we will test the acceptability and feasibility of developing the cohort. RESULTS: Acceptability and feasibility of the study will be measured by a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The primary outcome measure is the rate of consent to inclusion to the IP3-PROSPECT cohort. Secondary outcome measures include the completeness of data collection at sites and return rates of patient questionnaires. We will also interview patients and healthcare professionals to explore their thoughts on the implementation, practicality and efficiency of IP3-PROSPECT. CONCLUSION: The IP3-PROSPECT study will evaluate the cmRCT design in prostate cancer. Initially we will pilot the design, assessing for acceptability and feasibility. The cmRCT is an innovative design that offers potential for building a modern comparative evidence base for prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8451266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84512662021-09-23 PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study Bass, E.J. Klimowska-Nassar, N. Sasikaran, T. Day, E. Fiorentino, F. Sydes, M.R. Winkler, M. Arumainayagam, N. Khoubehi, B. Pope, A. Sokhi, H. Dudderidge, T. Ahmed, H.U. Contemp Clin Trials Article INTRODUCTION: The traditional double blind RCT is the ‘gold standard’ trial design. For a variety of reasons, these designs often fail to accrue enough participants to conclude. This is particularly challenging in localized prostate cancer. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) trial design may represent an alternative approach to delivering robust comparative data in prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IP3-PROSPECT is a cmRCT designed to test multiple prostate cancer interventions from eligible men in one cohort. Key to the design is two points of consent. First, at point of consent one, men referred for prostate cancer investigations are invited to join the cohort. They may then be randomly invited at a later date to consider an intervention at point of consent two. In the pilot phase we will test the acceptability and feasibility of developing the cohort. RESULTS: Acceptability and feasibility of the study will be measured by a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The primary outcome measure is the rate of consent to inclusion to the IP3-PROSPECT cohort. Secondary outcome measures include the completeness of data collection at sites and return rates of patient questionnaires. We will also interview patients and healthcare professionals to explore their thoughts on the implementation, practicality and efficiency of IP3-PROSPECT. CONCLUSION: The IP3-PROSPECT study will evaluate the cmRCT design in prostate cancer. Initially we will pilot the design, assessing for acceptability and feasibility. The cmRCT is an innovative design that offers potential for building a modern comparative evidence base for prostate cancer. Elsevier 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8451266/ /pubmed/34139356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106485 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bass, E.J.
Klimowska-Nassar, N.
Sasikaran, T.
Day, E.
Fiorentino, F.
Sydes, M.R.
Winkler, M.
Arumainayagam, N.
Khoubehi, B.
Pope, A.
Sokhi, H.
Dudderidge, T.
Ahmed, H.U.
PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study
title PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study
title_full PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study
title_fullStr PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study
title_full_unstemmed PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study
title_short PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study
title_sort prostate pathway embedded comparative trial: the ip3-prospect study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34139356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106485
work_keys_str_mv AT bassej prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy
AT klimowskanassarn prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy
AT sasikarant prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy
AT daye prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy
AT fiorentinof prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy
AT sydesmr prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy
AT winklerm prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy
AT arumainayagamn prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy
AT khoubehib prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy
AT popea prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy
AT sokhih prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy
AT dudderidget prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy
AT ahmedhu prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy