Cargando…
PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study
INTRODUCTION: The traditional double blind RCT is the ‘gold standard’ trial design. For a variety of reasons, these designs often fail to accrue enough participants to conclude. This is particularly challenging in localized prostate cancer. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) tri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34139356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106485 |
_version_ | 1784569806674984960 |
---|---|
author | Bass, E.J. Klimowska-Nassar, N. Sasikaran, T. Day, E. Fiorentino, F. Sydes, M.R. Winkler, M. Arumainayagam, N. Khoubehi, B. Pope, A. Sokhi, H. Dudderidge, T. Ahmed, H.U. |
author_facet | Bass, E.J. Klimowska-Nassar, N. Sasikaran, T. Day, E. Fiorentino, F. Sydes, M.R. Winkler, M. Arumainayagam, N. Khoubehi, B. Pope, A. Sokhi, H. Dudderidge, T. Ahmed, H.U. |
author_sort | Bass, E.J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The traditional double blind RCT is the ‘gold standard’ trial design. For a variety of reasons, these designs often fail to accrue enough participants to conclude. This is particularly challenging in localized prostate cancer. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) trial design may represent an alternative approach to delivering robust comparative data in prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IP3-PROSPECT is a cmRCT designed to test multiple prostate cancer interventions from eligible men in one cohort. Key to the design is two points of consent. First, at point of consent one, men referred for prostate cancer investigations are invited to join the cohort. They may then be randomly invited at a later date to consider an intervention at point of consent two. In the pilot phase we will test the acceptability and feasibility of developing the cohort. RESULTS: Acceptability and feasibility of the study will be measured by a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The primary outcome measure is the rate of consent to inclusion to the IP3-PROSPECT cohort. Secondary outcome measures include the completeness of data collection at sites and return rates of patient questionnaires. We will also interview patients and healthcare professionals to explore their thoughts on the implementation, practicality and efficiency of IP3-PROSPECT. CONCLUSION: The IP3-PROSPECT study will evaluate the cmRCT design in prostate cancer. Initially we will pilot the design, assessing for acceptability and feasibility. The cmRCT is an innovative design that offers potential for building a modern comparative evidence base for prostate cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8451266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84512662021-09-23 PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study Bass, E.J. Klimowska-Nassar, N. Sasikaran, T. Day, E. Fiorentino, F. Sydes, M.R. Winkler, M. Arumainayagam, N. Khoubehi, B. Pope, A. Sokhi, H. Dudderidge, T. Ahmed, H.U. Contemp Clin Trials Article INTRODUCTION: The traditional double blind RCT is the ‘gold standard’ trial design. For a variety of reasons, these designs often fail to accrue enough participants to conclude. This is particularly challenging in localized prostate cancer. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) trial design may represent an alternative approach to delivering robust comparative data in prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IP3-PROSPECT is a cmRCT designed to test multiple prostate cancer interventions from eligible men in one cohort. Key to the design is two points of consent. First, at point of consent one, men referred for prostate cancer investigations are invited to join the cohort. They may then be randomly invited at a later date to consider an intervention at point of consent two. In the pilot phase we will test the acceptability and feasibility of developing the cohort. RESULTS: Acceptability and feasibility of the study will be measured by a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The primary outcome measure is the rate of consent to inclusion to the IP3-PROSPECT cohort. Secondary outcome measures include the completeness of data collection at sites and return rates of patient questionnaires. We will also interview patients and healthcare professionals to explore their thoughts on the implementation, practicality and efficiency of IP3-PROSPECT. CONCLUSION: The IP3-PROSPECT study will evaluate the cmRCT design in prostate cancer. Initially we will pilot the design, assessing for acceptability and feasibility. The cmRCT is an innovative design that offers potential for building a modern comparative evidence base for prostate cancer. Elsevier 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8451266/ /pubmed/34139356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106485 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bass, E.J. Klimowska-Nassar, N. Sasikaran, T. Day, E. Fiorentino, F. Sydes, M.R. Winkler, M. Arumainayagam, N. Khoubehi, B. Pope, A. Sokhi, H. Dudderidge, T. Ahmed, H.U. PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study |
title | PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study |
title_full | PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study |
title_fullStr | PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study |
title_full_unstemmed | PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study |
title_short | PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study |
title_sort | prostate pathway embedded comparative trial: the ip3-prospect study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34139356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106485 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bassej prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy AT klimowskanassarn prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy AT sasikarant prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy AT daye prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy AT fiorentinof prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy AT sydesmr prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy AT winklerm prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy AT arumainayagamn prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy AT khoubehib prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy AT popea prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy AT sokhih prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy AT dudderidget prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy AT ahmedhu prostatepathwayembeddedcomparativetrialtheip3prospectstudy |