Cargando…

International expert consensus on electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products: a Delphi survey

OBJECTIVES: To provide a consensus from a panel of international experts about electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and heated tobacco products (HTP). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: A Delphi survey was conducted among international experts in tobacco control and smoking cessation. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berlin, Ivan, Jacot-Sadowski, Isabelle, Humair, Jean-Paul, Cornuz, Jacques
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34493505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045724
_version_ 1784569808732291072
author Berlin, Ivan
Jacot-Sadowski, Isabelle
Humair, Jean-Paul
Cornuz, Jacques
author_facet Berlin, Ivan
Jacot-Sadowski, Isabelle
Humair, Jean-Paul
Cornuz, Jacques
author_sort Berlin, Ivan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To provide a consensus from a panel of international experts about electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and heated tobacco products (HTP). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: A Delphi survey was conducted among international experts in tobacco control and smoking cessation. The first part addressed statements or recommendations about ENDS, the second about HTP, both divided into four categories: regulation, sale, use and general issues. SETTING: Experts from 15 countries. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with clinical, public health or research expertise in tobacco control and/or smoking cessation. RESULTS: 268 experts were contacted, 92 (34%) completed the first, 55/92 (60%) the second round. Consensus for ENDS: components of e-liquids, an upper limit of nicotine concentration should be defined; a warning on the lack of evidence in long-term safety and addiction potential should be stated; ENDS should not be regulated as consumer products but either as a new category of nicotine delivery or tobacco products; ENDS should not be sold in general stores but in specialised shops, shops selling tobacco or in pharmacies with restriction on sale to minors; administration of illegal drugs is likely with ENDS. Consensus for HTP: HTP have the same addictive potential as cigarettes; they should be regulated as a tobacco product with similar warning messages as cigarettes; their advertisement should not be allowed. ENDS and HTP use should not be allowed in indoor public places; a specific tax should be implemented for ENDS, taxes on HTP should not be lower than those for cigarettes; use of cigarettes is more likely with both ENDS and HTP (dual use) than quitting smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Experts in tobacco control and/or smoking cessation recommend differential regulation for ENDS and HTP. The results of this survey may be useful for health authorities, decision makers and researchers of the tobacco use and cessation field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8451280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84512802021-10-05 International expert consensus on electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products: a Delphi survey Berlin, Ivan Jacot-Sadowski, Isabelle Humair, Jean-Paul Cornuz, Jacques BMJ Open Smoking and Tobacco OBJECTIVES: To provide a consensus from a panel of international experts about electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and heated tobacco products (HTP). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: A Delphi survey was conducted among international experts in tobacco control and smoking cessation. The first part addressed statements or recommendations about ENDS, the second about HTP, both divided into four categories: regulation, sale, use and general issues. SETTING: Experts from 15 countries. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with clinical, public health or research expertise in tobacco control and/or smoking cessation. RESULTS: 268 experts were contacted, 92 (34%) completed the first, 55/92 (60%) the second round. Consensus for ENDS: components of e-liquids, an upper limit of nicotine concentration should be defined; a warning on the lack of evidence in long-term safety and addiction potential should be stated; ENDS should not be regulated as consumer products but either as a new category of nicotine delivery or tobacco products; ENDS should not be sold in general stores but in specialised shops, shops selling tobacco or in pharmacies with restriction on sale to minors; administration of illegal drugs is likely with ENDS. Consensus for HTP: HTP have the same addictive potential as cigarettes; they should be regulated as a tobacco product with similar warning messages as cigarettes; their advertisement should not be allowed. ENDS and HTP use should not be allowed in indoor public places; a specific tax should be implemented for ENDS, taxes on HTP should not be lower than those for cigarettes; use of cigarettes is more likely with both ENDS and HTP (dual use) than quitting smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Experts in tobacco control and/or smoking cessation recommend differential regulation for ENDS and HTP. The results of this survey may be useful for health authorities, decision makers and researchers of the tobacco use and cessation field. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8451280/ /pubmed/34493505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045724 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Smoking and Tobacco
Berlin, Ivan
Jacot-Sadowski, Isabelle
Humair, Jean-Paul
Cornuz, Jacques
International expert consensus on electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products: a Delphi survey
title International expert consensus on electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products: a Delphi survey
title_full International expert consensus on electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products: a Delphi survey
title_fullStr International expert consensus on electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products: a Delphi survey
title_full_unstemmed International expert consensus on electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products: a Delphi survey
title_short International expert consensus on electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products: a Delphi survey
title_sort international expert consensus on electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products: a delphi survey
topic Smoking and Tobacco
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34493505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045724
work_keys_str_mv AT berlinivan internationalexpertconsensusonelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsandheatedtobaccoproductsadelphisurvey
AT jacotsadowskiisabelle internationalexpertconsensusonelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsandheatedtobaccoproductsadelphisurvey
AT humairjeanpaul internationalexpertconsensusonelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsandheatedtobaccoproductsadelphisurvey
AT cornuzjacques internationalexpertconsensusonelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsandheatedtobaccoproductsadelphisurvey