Cargando…

Identifying persistent somatic symptoms in electronic health records: exploring multiple theory-driven methods of identification

OBJECTIVE: Persistent somatic symptoms (PSSs) are defined as symptoms not fully explained by well-established pathophysiological mechanisms and are prevalent in up to 10% of patients in primary care. The present study aimed to explore methods to identify patients with a recognisable risk of having P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitselaar, Willeke M, Numans, Mattijs E, Sutch, Stephen P, Faiq, Ammar, Evers, Andrea WM, van der Vaart, Rosalie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34535479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049907
_version_ 1784569811689275392
author Kitselaar, Willeke M
Numans, Mattijs E
Sutch, Stephen P
Faiq, Ammar
Evers, Andrea WM
van der Vaart, Rosalie
author_facet Kitselaar, Willeke M
Numans, Mattijs E
Sutch, Stephen P
Faiq, Ammar
Evers, Andrea WM
van der Vaart, Rosalie
author_sort Kitselaar, Willeke M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Persistent somatic symptoms (PSSs) are defined as symptoms not fully explained by well-established pathophysiological mechanisms and are prevalent in up to 10% of patients in primary care. The present study aimed to explore methods to identify patients with a recognisable risk of having PSS in routine primary care data. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study to explore four identification methods that each cover part of the broad spectrum of PSS was performed. Cases were selected based on (1) PSS-related syndrome codes, (2) PSS-related symptom codes, (3) PSS-related terminology and (4) Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire scores and all methods combined. SETTING: Coded electronic health record data were extracted from 76 general practices in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were registered for at least 1 year during 2014–2018, were included (n=169 138). OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification methods were explored based on (1) PSS sample sizes and demographics, (2) presence of chronic conditions and (3) healthcare utilisation (HCU) variables. Overlap between methods and practice specific differences were examined. RESULTS: The percentage of cases identified varied between 0.3% and 7.0% across the methods. Over 58.1% of cases had chronic physical condition(s) and over 33.8% had chronic mental condition(s). HCU was generally higher for cases selected by any method compared with the total cohort. HCU was higher for method B compared with the other methods. In 26.7% of cases, cases were selected by multiple methods. Overlap between methods was low. CONCLUSIONS: Different methods yielded different patient samples which were general practice specific. Therefore, for the most comprehensive data-based selection of PSS cases, a combination of methods A, C and D would be recommended. Advanced (data-driven) methods are needed to create a more sensitive algorithm for identifying the full spectrum of PSS. For clinical purposes, method B could possibly support screening of patients who are currently missed in daily practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8451292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84512922021-10-05 Identifying persistent somatic symptoms in electronic health records: exploring multiple theory-driven methods of identification Kitselaar, Willeke M Numans, Mattijs E Sutch, Stephen P Faiq, Ammar Evers, Andrea WM van der Vaart, Rosalie BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: Persistent somatic symptoms (PSSs) are defined as symptoms not fully explained by well-established pathophysiological mechanisms and are prevalent in up to 10% of patients in primary care. The present study aimed to explore methods to identify patients with a recognisable risk of having PSS in routine primary care data. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study to explore four identification methods that each cover part of the broad spectrum of PSS was performed. Cases were selected based on (1) PSS-related syndrome codes, (2) PSS-related symptom codes, (3) PSS-related terminology and (4) Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire scores and all methods combined. SETTING: Coded electronic health record data were extracted from 76 general practices in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were registered for at least 1 year during 2014–2018, were included (n=169 138). OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification methods were explored based on (1) PSS sample sizes and demographics, (2) presence of chronic conditions and (3) healthcare utilisation (HCU) variables. Overlap between methods and practice specific differences were examined. RESULTS: The percentage of cases identified varied between 0.3% and 7.0% across the methods. Over 58.1% of cases had chronic physical condition(s) and over 33.8% had chronic mental condition(s). HCU was generally higher for cases selected by any method compared with the total cohort. HCU was higher for method B compared with the other methods. In 26.7% of cases, cases were selected by multiple methods. Overlap between methods was low. CONCLUSIONS: Different methods yielded different patient samples which were general practice specific. Therefore, for the most comprehensive data-based selection of PSS cases, a combination of methods A, C and D would be recommended. Advanced (data-driven) methods are needed to create a more sensitive algorithm for identifying the full spectrum of PSS. For clinical purposes, method B could possibly support screening of patients who are currently missed in daily practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8451292/ /pubmed/34535479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049907 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Kitselaar, Willeke M
Numans, Mattijs E
Sutch, Stephen P
Faiq, Ammar
Evers, Andrea WM
van der Vaart, Rosalie
Identifying persistent somatic symptoms in electronic health records: exploring multiple theory-driven methods of identification
title Identifying persistent somatic symptoms in electronic health records: exploring multiple theory-driven methods of identification
title_full Identifying persistent somatic symptoms in electronic health records: exploring multiple theory-driven methods of identification
title_fullStr Identifying persistent somatic symptoms in electronic health records: exploring multiple theory-driven methods of identification
title_full_unstemmed Identifying persistent somatic symptoms in electronic health records: exploring multiple theory-driven methods of identification
title_short Identifying persistent somatic symptoms in electronic health records: exploring multiple theory-driven methods of identification
title_sort identifying persistent somatic symptoms in electronic health records: exploring multiple theory-driven methods of identification
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34535479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049907
work_keys_str_mv AT kitselaarwillekem identifyingpersistentsomaticsymptomsinelectronichealthrecordsexploringmultipletheorydrivenmethodsofidentification
AT numansmattijse identifyingpersistentsomaticsymptomsinelectronichealthrecordsexploringmultipletheorydrivenmethodsofidentification
AT sutchstephenp identifyingpersistentsomaticsymptomsinelectronichealthrecordsexploringmultipletheorydrivenmethodsofidentification
AT faiqammar identifyingpersistentsomaticsymptomsinelectronichealthrecordsexploringmultipletheorydrivenmethodsofidentification
AT eversandreawm identifyingpersistentsomaticsymptomsinelectronichealthrecordsexploringmultipletheorydrivenmethodsofidentification
AT vandervaartrosalie identifyingpersistentsomaticsymptomsinelectronichealthrecordsexploringmultipletheorydrivenmethodsofidentification