Cargando…

Evaluation of Cell-Based and Surrogate SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assays

Determinants of protective immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection require the development of well-standardized, reproducible antibody assays. This need has led to the emergence of a variety of neutralization assays. Head-to-head evaluation of differen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sholukh, Anton M., Fiore-Gartland, Andrew, Ford, Emily S., Miner, Maurine D., Hou, Yixuan J., Tse, Longping V., Kaiser, Hannah, Zhu, Haiying, Lu, Joyce, Madarampalli, Bhanupriya, Park, Arnold, Lempp, Florian A., St. Germain, Russell, Bossard, Emily L., Kee, Jia Jin, Diem, Kurt, Stuart, Andrew B., Rupert, Peter B., Brock, Chance, Buerger, Matthew, Doll, Margaret K., Randhawa, April Kaur, Stamatatos, Leonidas, Strong, Roland K., McLaughlin, Colleen, Huang, Meei-Li, Jerome, Keith R., Baric, Ralph S., Montefiori, David, Corey, Lawrence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34288726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00527-21
_version_ 1784569837432864768
author Sholukh, Anton M.
Fiore-Gartland, Andrew
Ford, Emily S.
Miner, Maurine D.
Hou, Yixuan J.
Tse, Longping V.
Kaiser, Hannah
Zhu, Haiying
Lu, Joyce
Madarampalli, Bhanupriya
Park, Arnold
Lempp, Florian A.
St. Germain, Russell
Bossard, Emily L.
Kee, Jia Jin
Diem, Kurt
Stuart, Andrew B.
Rupert, Peter B.
Brock, Chance
Buerger, Matthew
Doll, Margaret K.
Randhawa, April Kaur
Stamatatos, Leonidas
Strong, Roland K.
McLaughlin, Colleen
Huang, Meei-Li
Jerome, Keith R.
Baric, Ralph S.
Montefiori, David
Corey, Lawrence
author_facet Sholukh, Anton M.
Fiore-Gartland, Andrew
Ford, Emily S.
Miner, Maurine D.
Hou, Yixuan J.
Tse, Longping V.
Kaiser, Hannah
Zhu, Haiying
Lu, Joyce
Madarampalli, Bhanupriya
Park, Arnold
Lempp, Florian A.
St. Germain, Russell
Bossard, Emily L.
Kee, Jia Jin
Diem, Kurt
Stuart, Andrew B.
Rupert, Peter B.
Brock, Chance
Buerger, Matthew
Doll, Margaret K.
Randhawa, April Kaur
Stamatatos, Leonidas
Strong, Roland K.
McLaughlin, Colleen
Huang, Meei-Li
Jerome, Keith R.
Baric, Ralph S.
Montefiori, David
Corey, Lawrence
author_sort Sholukh, Anton M.
collection PubMed
description Determinants of protective immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection require the development of well-standardized, reproducible antibody assays. This need has led to the emergence of a variety of neutralization assays. Head-to-head evaluation of different SARS-CoV-2 neutralization platforms could facilitate comparisons across studies and laboratories. Five neutralization assays were compared using 40 plasma samples from convalescent individuals with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): four cell-based systems using either live recombinant SARS-CoV-2 or pseudotyped viral particles created with lentivirus (LV) or vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) packaging and one surrogate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based test that measures inhibition of the spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) binding its receptor human angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (hACE2). Vero cells, Vero E6 cells, HEK293T cells expressing hACE2, and TZM-bl cells expressing hACE2 and transmembrane serine protease 2 were tested. All cell-based assays showed 50% neutralizing dilution (ND(50)) geometric mean titers (GMTs) that were highly correlated (Pearson r = 0.81 to 0.89) and ranged within 3.4-fold. The live virus assay and LV pseudovirus assays with HEK293T/hACE2 cells showed very similar mean titers, 141 and 178, respectively. ND(50) titers positively correlated with plasma IgG targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and RBD (r = 0.63 to 0.89), but moderately correlated with nucleoprotein IgG (r = 0.46 to 0.73). ND(80) GMTs mirrored ND(50) data and showed similar correlation between assays and with IgG concentrations. The VSV pseudovirus assay and LV pseudovirus assay with HEK293T/hACE2 cells in low- and high-throughput versions were calibrated against the WHO SARS-CoV-2 IgG standard. High concordance between the outcomes of cell-based assays with live and pseudotyped virions enables valid cross-study comparison using these platforms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8451402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84514022021-10-04 Evaluation of Cell-Based and Surrogate SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assays Sholukh, Anton M. Fiore-Gartland, Andrew Ford, Emily S. Miner, Maurine D. Hou, Yixuan J. Tse, Longping V. Kaiser, Hannah Zhu, Haiying Lu, Joyce Madarampalli, Bhanupriya Park, Arnold Lempp, Florian A. St. Germain, Russell Bossard, Emily L. Kee, Jia Jin Diem, Kurt Stuart, Andrew B. Rupert, Peter B. Brock, Chance Buerger, Matthew Doll, Margaret K. Randhawa, April Kaur Stamatatos, Leonidas Strong, Roland K. McLaughlin, Colleen Huang, Meei-Li Jerome, Keith R. Baric, Ralph S. Montefiori, David Corey, Lawrence J Clin Microbiol Virology Determinants of protective immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection require the development of well-standardized, reproducible antibody assays. This need has led to the emergence of a variety of neutralization assays. Head-to-head evaluation of different SARS-CoV-2 neutralization platforms could facilitate comparisons across studies and laboratories. Five neutralization assays were compared using 40 plasma samples from convalescent individuals with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): four cell-based systems using either live recombinant SARS-CoV-2 or pseudotyped viral particles created with lentivirus (LV) or vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) packaging and one surrogate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based test that measures inhibition of the spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) binding its receptor human angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (hACE2). Vero cells, Vero E6 cells, HEK293T cells expressing hACE2, and TZM-bl cells expressing hACE2 and transmembrane serine protease 2 were tested. All cell-based assays showed 50% neutralizing dilution (ND(50)) geometric mean titers (GMTs) that were highly correlated (Pearson r = 0.81 to 0.89) and ranged within 3.4-fold. The live virus assay and LV pseudovirus assays with HEK293T/hACE2 cells showed very similar mean titers, 141 and 178, respectively. ND(50) titers positively correlated with plasma IgG targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and RBD (r = 0.63 to 0.89), but moderately correlated with nucleoprotein IgG (r = 0.46 to 0.73). ND(80) GMTs mirrored ND(50) data and showed similar correlation between assays and with IgG concentrations. The VSV pseudovirus assay and LV pseudovirus assay with HEK293T/hACE2 cells in low- and high-throughput versions were calibrated against the WHO SARS-CoV-2 IgG standard. High concordance between the outcomes of cell-based assays with live and pseudotyped virions enables valid cross-study comparison using these platforms. American Society for Microbiology 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8451402/ /pubmed/34288726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00527-21 Text en Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/ASMCopyrightv2All Rights Reserved (https://doi.org/10.1128/ASMCopyrightv2) . https://doi.org/10.1128/ASMCopyrightv2This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted noncommercial re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Virology
Sholukh, Anton M.
Fiore-Gartland, Andrew
Ford, Emily S.
Miner, Maurine D.
Hou, Yixuan J.
Tse, Longping V.
Kaiser, Hannah
Zhu, Haiying
Lu, Joyce
Madarampalli, Bhanupriya
Park, Arnold
Lempp, Florian A.
St. Germain, Russell
Bossard, Emily L.
Kee, Jia Jin
Diem, Kurt
Stuart, Andrew B.
Rupert, Peter B.
Brock, Chance
Buerger, Matthew
Doll, Margaret K.
Randhawa, April Kaur
Stamatatos, Leonidas
Strong, Roland K.
McLaughlin, Colleen
Huang, Meei-Li
Jerome, Keith R.
Baric, Ralph S.
Montefiori, David
Corey, Lawrence
Evaluation of Cell-Based and Surrogate SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assays
title Evaluation of Cell-Based and Surrogate SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assays
title_full Evaluation of Cell-Based and Surrogate SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assays
title_fullStr Evaluation of Cell-Based and Surrogate SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assays
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Cell-Based and Surrogate SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assays
title_short Evaluation of Cell-Based and Surrogate SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assays
title_sort evaluation of cell-based and surrogate sars-cov-2 neutralization assays
topic Virology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34288726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00527-21
work_keys_str_mv AT sholukhantonm evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT fioregartlandandrew evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT fordemilys evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT minermaurined evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT houyixuanj evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT tselongpingv evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT kaiserhannah evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT zhuhaiying evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT lujoyce evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT madarampallibhanupriya evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT parkarnold evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT lemppfloriana evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT stgermainrussell evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT bossardemilyl evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT keejiajin evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT diemkurt evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT stuartandrewb evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT rupertpeterb evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT brockchance evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT buergermatthew evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT dollmargaretk evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT randhawaaprilkaur evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT stamatatosleonidas evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT strongrolandk evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT mclaughlincolleen evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT huangmeeili evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT jeromekeithr evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT baricralphs evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT montefioridavid evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays
AT coreylawrence evaluationofcellbasedandsurrogatesarscov2neutralizationassays