Cargando…

A cross-sectional study of the nasal and fecal microbiota of sows from different health status within six commercial swine farms

BACKGROUND: Cull sows are a unique population on swine farms, often representing poor producing or compromised animals, and even though recent studies have reported that the microbiome is associated with susceptibility to diseases, the microbiome of the cull sow population has not been explored. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arruda, Andreia G., Deblais, Loic, Hale, Vanessa L., Madden, Christopher, Pairis-Garcia, Monique, Srivastava, Vishal, Kathayat, Dipak, Kumar, Anand, Rajashekara, Gireesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616608
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12120
_version_ 1784569843160186880
author Arruda, Andreia G.
Deblais, Loic
Hale, Vanessa L.
Madden, Christopher
Pairis-Garcia, Monique
Srivastava, Vishal
Kathayat, Dipak
Kumar, Anand
Rajashekara, Gireesh
author_facet Arruda, Andreia G.
Deblais, Loic
Hale, Vanessa L.
Madden, Christopher
Pairis-Garcia, Monique
Srivastava, Vishal
Kathayat, Dipak
Kumar, Anand
Rajashekara, Gireesh
author_sort Arruda, Andreia G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cull sows are a unique population on swine farms, often representing poor producing or compromised animals, and even though recent studies have reported that the microbiome is associated with susceptibility to diseases, the microbiome of the cull sow population has not been explored. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether there were differences in fecal and upper respiratory tract microbiota composition for groups of sows of different health status (healthy, cull, and compromised/ clinical sows) and from different farms (1 to 6). METHODS: Six swine farms were visited once. Thirty individual fecal samples and nasal swabs were obtained at each farm and pooled by five across health status and farm. Samples underwent 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and nasal and fecal microbiota were analyzed using QIIME2 v.2021.4. RESULTS: Overall, the diversity of the nasal microbiota was lower than the fecal microbiota (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in fecal or nasal alpha diversity by sow’s health status or by farm. There were significant differences in nasal microbial composition by farm and health status (PERMANOVA, p < 0.05), and in fecal microbiota by farm (PERMANOVA, p < 0.05), but not by health status. Lastly, at the L7 level, there was one differentially abundant taxa across farms for each nasal and fecal pooled samples. DISCUSSION: This study provided baseline information for nasal and fecal microbiota of sows under field conditions, and results suggest that farm of origin can affect microbial diversity and composition. Furthermore, sow’s health status may have an impact on the nasal microbiota composition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8451438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84514382021-10-05 A cross-sectional study of the nasal and fecal microbiota of sows from different health status within six commercial swine farms Arruda, Andreia G. Deblais, Loic Hale, Vanessa L. Madden, Christopher Pairis-Garcia, Monique Srivastava, Vishal Kathayat, Dipak Kumar, Anand Rajashekara, Gireesh PeerJ Agricultural Science BACKGROUND: Cull sows are a unique population on swine farms, often representing poor producing or compromised animals, and even though recent studies have reported that the microbiome is associated with susceptibility to diseases, the microbiome of the cull sow population has not been explored. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether there were differences in fecal and upper respiratory tract microbiota composition for groups of sows of different health status (healthy, cull, and compromised/ clinical sows) and from different farms (1 to 6). METHODS: Six swine farms were visited once. Thirty individual fecal samples and nasal swabs were obtained at each farm and pooled by five across health status and farm. Samples underwent 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and nasal and fecal microbiota were analyzed using QIIME2 v.2021.4. RESULTS: Overall, the diversity of the nasal microbiota was lower than the fecal microbiota (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in fecal or nasal alpha diversity by sow’s health status or by farm. There were significant differences in nasal microbial composition by farm and health status (PERMANOVA, p < 0.05), and in fecal microbiota by farm (PERMANOVA, p < 0.05), but not by health status. Lastly, at the L7 level, there was one differentially abundant taxa across farms for each nasal and fecal pooled samples. DISCUSSION: This study provided baseline information for nasal and fecal microbiota of sows under field conditions, and results suggest that farm of origin can affect microbial diversity and composition. Furthermore, sow’s health status may have an impact on the nasal microbiota composition. PeerJ Inc. 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8451438/ /pubmed/34616608 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12120 Text en ©2021 Arruda et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Agricultural Science
Arruda, Andreia G.
Deblais, Loic
Hale, Vanessa L.
Madden, Christopher
Pairis-Garcia, Monique
Srivastava, Vishal
Kathayat, Dipak
Kumar, Anand
Rajashekara, Gireesh
A cross-sectional study of the nasal and fecal microbiota of sows from different health status within six commercial swine farms
title A cross-sectional study of the nasal and fecal microbiota of sows from different health status within six commercial swine farms
title_full A cross-sectional study of the nasal and fecal microbiota of sows from different health status within six commercial swine farms
title_fullStr A cross-sectional study of the nasal and fecal microbiota of sows from different health status within six commercial swine farms
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional study of the nasal and fecal microbiota of sows from different health status within six commercial swine farms
title_short A cross-sectional study of the nasal and fecal microbiota of sows from different health status within six commercial swine farms
title_sort cross-sectional study of the nasal and fecal microbiota of sows from different health status within six commercial swine farms
topic Agricultural Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34616608
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12120
work_keys_str_mv AT arrudaandreiag acrosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT deblaisloic acrosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT halevanessal acrosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT maddenchristopher acrosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT pairisgarciamonique acrosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT srivastavavishal acrosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT kathayatdipak acrosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT kumaranand acrosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT rajashekaragireesh acrosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT arrudaandreiag crosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT deblaisloic crosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT halevanessal crosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT maddenchristopher crosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT pairisgarciamonique crosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT srivastavavishal crosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT kathayatdipak crosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT kumaranand crosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms
AT rajashekaragireesh crosssectionalstudyofthenasalandfecalmicrobiotaofsowsfromdifferenthealthstatuswithinsixcommercialswinefarms