Cargando…
Varicocele treatment in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review
Objective: To review the available literature and identify factors associated with successful outcomes after varicocele repair (VR) in the setting of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Methods: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for relevant articles. Primary outcomes were return of spont...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34552773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2021.1956838 |
_version_ | 1784569889123467264 |
---|---|
author | Jensen, Stephanie Ko, Edmund Y. |
author_facet | Jensen, Stephanie Ko, Edmund Y. |
author_sort | Jensen, Stephanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To review the available literature and identify factors associated with successful outcomes after varicocele repair (VR) in the setting of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Methods: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for relevant articles. Primary outcomes were return of spontaneous spermatogenesis, sperm retrieval rates (SRRs), and unassisted and assisted pregnancy rates. Histopathological subtypes, when available, were used for subgroup analysis. Results: A total of 16 articles were finally included. The average sample size was 43 and average duration of follow-up was 10.5 months. The average rate of primary spermatogenesis after VR was 27.3%. The average SRR, across five studies in men with NOA undergoing microscopic testicular sperm extraction status after varicocelectomy, was 48.9% vs 32.1% for the untreated cohort groups, and the average spontaneous pregnancy rate was 5.24%. Histopathology subtype was a significant contributing factor when analysed. Conclusion: Varicocele repair should be considered in men with NOA, as it may allow some patients to avoid assisted reproductive technologies and improves success rates when utilised. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8451638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84516382021-09-21 Varicocele treatment in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review Jensen, Stephanie Ko, Edmund Y. Arab J Urol Review Article Objective: To review the available literature and identify factors associated with successful outcomes after varicocele repair (VR) in the setting of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Methods: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for relevant articles. Primary outcomes were return of spontaneous spermatogenesis, sperm retrieval rates (SRRs), and unassisted and assisted pregnancy rates. Histopathological subtypes, when available, were used for subgroup analysis. Results: A total of 16 articles were finally included. The average sample size was 43 and average duration of follow-up was 10.5 months. The average rate of primary spermatogenesis after VR was 27.3%. The average SRR, across five studies in men with NOA undergoing microscopic testicular sperm extraction status after varicocelectomy, was 48.9% vs 32.1% for the untreated cohort groups, and the average spontaneous pregnancy rate was 5.24%. Histopathology subtype was a significant contributing factor when analysed. Conclusion: Varicocele repair should be considered in men with NOA, as it may allow some patients to avoid assisted reproductive technologies and improves success rates when utilised. Taylor & Francis 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8451638/ /pubmed/34552773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2021.1956838 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Jensen, Stephanie Ko, Edmund Y. Varicocele treatment in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review |
title | Varicocele treatment in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review |
title_full | Varicocele treatment in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Varicocele treatment in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Varicocele treatment in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review |
title_short | Varicocele treatment in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review |
title_sort | varicocele treatment in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34552773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2021.1956838 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jensenstephanie varicoceletreatmentinnonobstructiveazoospermiaasystematicreview AT koedmundy varicoceletreatmentinnonobstructiveazoospermiaasystematicreview |